Reduction by Pasireotide of the Effluent Volume in High-output Enterostomy in Patients Refractory to Usual Medical Treatment

NCT ID: NCT02713776

Last Updated: 2025-12-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

57 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-12-13

Study Completion Date

2021-01-08

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

During rectal or complex digestive surgery with multiple digestive resections and anastomosis, the creation of enterostomy is a common procedure. In France, it is estimated that 20000 patients have an ileostomy and 16000 new digestive stomas are formed each year with approximately 30% of enterostomy. Enterostomy might sometimes give high-output not controlled with usual medical treatment (e.g loperamide ± codeine) and exposes the patients to important hydro-electrolytic loss leading to a risk for dehydration, electrolyte abnormalities and acute renal failure. This risk implies parenteral correction which may extend hospital stay and delay home return.

Somatostatin analogues (octreotide, lanreotide and pasireotide) could reduce digestive secretions and decrease digestive peristalsis. Nevertheless, somatostatin analogues are not routinely used for the treatment of patients with high-output enterostomy and their efficacy in the indication (off-label) was only tested in small case series. Pasireotide (SOM230, SIGNIFOR®) is currently indicated for the treatment of patients with Cushing's disease for whom surgery is not an option or for whom surgery has failed.

As the efficacity of pasireotide in patients with high-output enterostomy refractory to usual medical treatment associated with an oral fluid restriction has never been demonstrated before, there is a need to perform a pilot, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluating its impact on reduction of the effluent volume.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Enterostomy

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

High-Output Enterostomy Pasireotide Somatostatin Analogues

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Pasireotide

Pasireotide 0.9 mg by subcutaneous injection twice a day during 3 days and 1 intramuscular injection of pasireotide Long Acting Release (LAR) 60mg on Day 4 morning.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Pasireotide

Intervention Type DRUG

Pasireotide 0.9 mg by subcutaneous injection twice a day during 3 days and 1 intramuscular injection of pasireotide Long Acting Release (LAR) 60mg on Day 4 morning.

Placebo

Placebo by subcutaneous injection twice a day during 3 days and 1 intramuscular injection of placebo on Day 4 morning.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo by subcutaneous injection twice a day during 3 days and 1 intramuscular injection of placebo on Day 4 morning.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pasireotide

Pasireotide 0.9 mg by subcutaneous injection twice a day during 3 days and 1 intramuscular injection of pasireotide Long Acting Release (LAR) 60mg on Day 4 morning.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Placebo by subcutaneous injection twice a day during 3 days and 1 intramuscular injection of placebo on Day 4 morning.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Pasireotide 0.9 mg (SIGNIFOR®) and Pasireotide 60mg Long Acting Release (LAR) Placebo of pasireotide 0.9 mg by subcutaneous injection twice a day during 3 days and 1 intramuscular injection of pasireotide LAR (Long Acting Release) 60mg on Day 4

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male and Female patients ≥ 18 years old ;
* Patients who underwent an intestinal surgery with enterostomy repair in the three weeks preceding the inclusion ;
* Patients with high-output ileostomy or jejunostomy \> 1000 ml/24h ;
* Patients with failure of treatment combining oral fluid restriction and loperamide (up to 8 capsules/24h) +/- codeine syrup (10 mg x 3/24h) during 5 days ;
* Patients who gave its written informed consent to participate to the study ;
* Patients affiliated to a social insurance regime.

Exclusion Criteria

* Male and Female patients \< 18 years old ;
* Patients who did not give its written informed consent to participate to the study ;
* Patients who received somatostatin analogues during the month before inclusion ;
* Patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis or acute or chronic pancreatitis ;
* Patients with uncontrolled diabetes (with HbA1c (glycated hemoglobin) \> 8%) ;
* Patients who are hypothyroid and not on adequate replacement therapy ;
* Patients who have congestive heart failure (NYHA (New York Heart Association) Class III or IV), unstable angina, sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, advanced heart block or a history of clinically significant bradycardia or acute myocardial infarction within the 6 months preceding randomization ;
* Patients with history of syncope or family history of idiopathic sudden death ;
* Patients with screening or baseline (predose) : QT interval corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's correction (QTcF) QTcF \> 450 msec (male), QTcF \> 460 msec (female) (QT interval corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's correction) ;
* Patients with not corrected hypokalaemia and/or hypomagnesaemia ;
* Patients with liver disease such as cirrhosis, chronic active hepatitis, or chronic persistent hepatitis, or patients with alanine transaminase/aspartate transaminase (ALT/AST) \> 2 x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN), serum bilirubin \> 2 x ULN ;
* Patients with Child-Pugh C cirrhosis ;
* Female patients who are pregnant or lactating, or are of childbearing potential and not practicing a medically acceptable method of birth control ;
* Patients with abnormal coagulation (PT and/or APTT elevated by 30% above normal limits) or patients receiving anticoagulants that affect PT (prothrombin time) or activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) ;
* Patients with known hypersensitivity to somatostatin analogues or any other component of the pasireotide LAR ;
* Patients under guardianship ;
* Patients nonaffiliated to a social insurance regime.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospices Civils de Lyon

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Eddy COTTE, Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospices Civils de Lyon - Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Chu Amiens-Picardie

Amiens, , France

Site Status

Chu Estaing

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

Hopital Beaujon

Clichy, , France

Site Status

Chu Albert Michallon

La Tronche, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Claude HURIEZ - CHRU Lille

Lille, , France

Site Status

Centre Leon Berard

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Chu Marseille - Hopital Nord

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Institut Regional Du Cancer Val D'Aurelle

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Chu Caremeau

Nîmes, , France

Site Status

Hopital Saint Antoine

Paris, , France

Site Status

Bordeaux Chu - Hopital Haut-Leveque

Pessac, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud

Pierre-Bénite, , France

Site Status

Chu Rouen Ch. Nicolle

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Toulouse - Chu Purpan

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Beffara B, Hadj-Bouziane F, Hamed SB, Boehler CN, Chelazzi L, Santandrea E, Macaluso E. Dynamic causal interactions between occipital and parietal cortex explain how endogenous spatial attention and stimulus-driven salience jointly shape the distribution of processing priorities in 2D visual space. Neuroimage. 2022 Jul 15;255:119206. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119206. Epub 2022 Apr 12.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 35427770 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2014_880

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id