The Effects of An Addition of Water Enema to PEG for Colon Preparation

NCT ID: NCT03270046

Last Updated: 2017-09-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-08-31

Study Completion Date

2015-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the preparation quality by using Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale between the standard PEG preparation and the addition of water enema in participants scheduled for CRC screening

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background : Good bowel preparation improves the rate of polyp detection and the time of caecal intubation during colorectal cancer (CRC) screening.

Suboptimal bowel preparation can results in adenoma miss rate up to 42% (95% CI, 35-49) and advanced adenoma miss rate up to 27% (95% CI, 17-41) The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline recommends a split regimen of 4L of polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution (or a same-day regimen in the case of afternoon colonoscopy) for a routine bowel preparation and the delay between the last dose of bowel preparation and colonoscopy should be minimized and no longer than 4 hours.

The investigators hypothesize that the addition of water enema to the standard PEG bowel preparation could provide the better quality of bowel preparation and then result in improvement in the rate of adenoma detection among participants scheduled for CRC screening with preparation to procedure interval \> 8 hr.

The purpose of this study is to compare the preparation quality using Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale between the standard PEG preparation and the addition of water enema in participants scheduled for CRC screening. The secondary aim is to compare the effect of the standard PEG bowel preparation and the addition of water enema in terms of adenoma detection rate, the completeness of the examination, total and withdrawal time, safety and adverse events among those scheduled for CRC screening.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Adenoma, Bile Duct

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

In this study, participants will be randomised 1:1 to water enema group or no water enema group using blocked randomization with random block sizes.
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

No enema group

Consecutive participants will be randomly assigned to take a preparation regimen of 3 liter of PEG 8-16 hr. before colonoscopy without water enema.

Before the procedure, investigators record baseline parameters. Colonoscopies underwent by experienced endoscopists and by GI fellows. During the colonoscopy, the investigators recorded video, cecal intubation and withdraw time, amount and position of polyps, rate of complete examination and complication. The video was sent to other 2 endoscopists who did not known which participant was enema to evaluate the quality of bowel cleansing by using Ottawa bowel preparation scale and Likert scale for evaluation of side effect, complication during PEG ingestion, enema and colonoscopy, and participant satisfactory.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Water enema

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Addition of water enema in standard PEG preparation in participants scheduled for CRC screening.

Water enema group

Consecutive participants will be randomly assigned to take a preparation regimen of 3 liter of PEG 8-16 hr. before colonoscopy and enema with sterile water until stool was clear or patient felt discomfort but not exceed 3 liter, before colonoscopy.

Before the procedure, investigators record baseline parameters. Colonoscopies underwent by experienced endoscopists and by GI fellows. During the colonoscopy, the investigators recorded video, cecal intubation and withdraw time, amount and position of polyps, rate of complete examination and complication.The video was sent to other 2 endoscopists who did not known which participant was enema to evaluate the quality of bowel cleansing by using Ottawa bowel preparation scale and Likert scale.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Water enema

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Addition of water enema in standard PEG preparation in participants scheduled for CRC screening.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Water enema

Addition of water enema in standard PEG preparation in participants scheduled for CRC screening.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients scheduled for CRC screening
* Bowel preparation using 3 liters of PEG solution
* Colonoscopy performed at 8-16 hours after bowel preparation

Exclusion Criteria

* History of a failed bowel preparation
* Previous colonic surgery
* Uncontrolled underlying disease
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mahidol University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Somchai Leelakusolvong

Associate professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Somchai Leelakusolvong, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mahidol University

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Si307/2014

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Multi-centre Failed Bowel Prep RCT
NCT02976805 COMPLETED PHASE3