The Effects of An Addition of Water Enema to PEG for Colon Preparation
NCT ID: NCT03270046
Last Updated: 2017-09-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-08-31
2015-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Improved Bowel Preparation Method for Colonoscopy Based on Different Risk Stratification
NCT04582942
Efficacy of Tailored Bowel Preparation Strategy: A Randomized Controlled Study
NCT03765216
Efficacy of Tailored Bowel Preparation Strategy Guided by a Predictive Model
NCT03142854
A Predictive Model for Inadequate Bowel Preparation
NCT03704571
Comparing Single-dose Low-volume PEG Plus Bisacodyl vs. Split-dose PEG for Bowel Preparation in Morning Colonoscopy
NCT03248726
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Suboptimal bowel preparation can results in adenoma miss rate up to 42% (95% CI, 35-49) and advanced adenoma miss rate up to 27% (95% CI, 17-41) The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline recommends a split regimen of 4L of polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution (or a same-day regimen in the case of afternoon colonoscopy) for a routine bowel preparation and the delay between the last dose of bowel preparation and colonoscopy should be minimized and no longer than 4 hours.
The investigators hypothesize that the addition of water enema to the standard PEG bowel preparation could provide the better quality of bowel preparation and then result in improvement in the rate of adenoma detection among participants scheduled for CRC screening with preparation to procedure interval \> 8 hr.
The purpose of this study is to compare the preparation quality using Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale between the standard PEG preparation and the addition of water enema in participants scheduled for CRC screening. The secondary aim is to compare the effect of the standard PEG bowel preparation and the addition of water enema in terms of adenoma detection rate, the completeness of the examination, total and withdrawal time, safety and adverse events among those scheduled for CRC screening.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
No enema group
Consecutive participants will be randomly assigned to take a preparation regimen of 3 liter of PEG 8-16 hr. before colonoscopy without water enema.
Before the procedure, investigators record baseline parameters. Colonoscopies underwent by experienced endoscopists and by GI fellows. During the colonoscopy, the investigators recorded video, cecal intubation and withdraw time, amount and position of polyps, rate of complete examination and complication. The video was sent to other 2 endoscopists who did not known which participant was enema to evaluate the quality of bowel cleansing by using Ottawa bowel preparation scale and Likert scale for evaluation of side effect, complication during PEG ingestion, enema and colonoscopy, and participant satisfactory.
Water enema
Addition of water enema in standard PEG preparation in participants scheduled for CRC screening.
Water enema group
Consecutive participants will be randomly assigned to take a preparation regimen of 3 liter of PEG 8-16 hr. before colonoscopy and enema with sterile water until stool was clear or patient felt discomfort but not exceed 3 liter, before colonoscopy.
Before the procedure, investigators record baseline parameters. Colonoscopies underwent by experienced endoscopists and by GI fellows. During the colonoscopy, the investigators recorded video, cecal intubation and withdraw time, amount and position of polyps, rate of complete examination and complication.The video was sent to other 2 endoscopists who did not known which participant was enema to evaluate the quality of bowel cleansing by using Ottawa bowel preparation scale and Likert scale.
Water enema
Addition of water enema in standard PEG preparation in participants scheduled for CRC screening.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Water enema
Addition of water enema in standard PEG preparation in participants scheduled for CRC screening.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Bowel preparation using 3 liters of PEG solution
* Colonoscopy performed at 8-16 hours after bowel preparation
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous colonic surgery
* Uncontrolled underlying disease
* Pregnancy
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mahidol University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Somchai Leelakusolvong
Associate professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Somchai Leelakusolvong, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mahidol University
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Si307/2014
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.