Fast Arm Motor Skill Training

NCT ID: NCT05013762

Last Updated: 2024-05-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

44 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-06-15

Study Completion Date

2023-11-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Every year, almost 800,000 people experience a stroke in the United States, which lead to upper-limb impairments, making recovery of motor function a priority in stroke rehabilitation. 1) The primary objective of this study is to determine whether fast arm movement training on a tracking task ("Speed-training"), in chronic stroke survivors with mild to moderate paresis, will generalize to improve arm function better than dose-equivalent accuracy training on the same task. 2) study the effect of intensive arm training on the recovery of anticipatory feedforward control. 3) Determine the involvement of cerebellar-cortical circuits in the recovery of arm movements due to speed training.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

About 65% of stroke survivors experience long-term limitations in upper extremity (UE) functions. In particular, limitations in arm reaching movements are prominent and correlate strongly with patients' impairment levels. Because activities of daily living often involve the UEs, retraining reach and grasp skills is critical for return to a full quality-of-life. Yet, the training parameters required for effective rehabilitation of UE function are not known. Recent evidence suggests that high-speed movements during training are effective at improving arm movements in individuals with chronic stroke. Hence, fast movements generating large errors, would promote the restoration of the feedforward controllers and therefore improves arm movements and UE functions in individuals with chronic stroke. Because the cerebellum is involved in learning feedforward controllers from motor errors, the improvements would be proportional to the integrity of the cerebellar-cortical networks.

A double-blind quasi-randomized controlled study will be carried out in chronic post-stroke survivors. Participants will be assigned to either the speed-bias training group or a dose equivalent accuracy-bias training group (control) and will receive 4 days of training over a 1week period by a trained Occupational or physical therapist. Behavioral, EMG, and MRI data will be acquired within two weeks before, 3 days post, and one month after intervention.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cerebrovascular Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Assessments will be done by a blinded and standardized clinical researcher

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Speed-biased complex motor skill training

Participants will perform 400 complex movements per day over 4 days over a one-week period. The task requires participants to navigate their hand through a "track" projected on the surface of a table with a width of 5cm. Participants receive adaptive score based on their movement time. .

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Fast intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This intervention is based on recent body of evidence that high-speed movements during training are effective at improving arm movements in individuals with chronic stroke.Participants will be rewarded for movements performed within a short amount of time.

Accuracy-biased complex motor skill training

The accuracy-biased group receives a dose equivalent intervention with a emphasize on accuracy. The width of the track projected on the table is narrower (less than 2cm) and the adaptive score received are based on their accuracy to say within the boundary of the track.

Group Type OTHER

Active Monitoring

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This is an observation-only group. The training received in this group will be dose equivalent to the active group.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Fast intervention

This intervention is based on recent body of evidence that high-speed movements during training are effective at improving arm movements in individuals with chronic stroke.Participants will be rewarded for movements performed within a short amount of time.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Active Monitoring

This is an observation-only group. The training received in this group will be dose equivalent to the active group.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* At least 6 months following an ischemic supratentorial stroke
* At least 21 years of age
* Exhibit residual capability to move the paretic UE (Upper Extremity Fugl- Meyer motor score \>20/66)
* Able to follow a 2-step command (8th item on the MMSE test)
* Able to perform an unassisted arm reach movement of 25 cm ahead of the body within 5 seconds with trunk restraint
* Exhibit no greater than mild/moderate spasticity as assessed with a Modified Ashworth Score \< 3

Exclusion Criteria

* any neurologic diagnoses other than stroke
* peripheral movement restrictions, such as neuropathy
* orthopedic disorders affecting the paretic UE
* severe pain or sensory/proprioceptive impairment in the more affected UE
* visual neglect (more than 4% of lines left uncrossed on Albert's test).
* had a stroke directly affecting the cerebellum
* any contra-indications to MRI scanning
* mostly resolved impairments with an Upper Extremity Fugl- Meyer motor score \>58/66
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Southern California

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Carolee Winstein

Professor, Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nicolas Schweighofer, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Southern California

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare

Pomona, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lang CE, Strube MJ, Bland MD, Waddell KJ, Cherry-Allen KM, Nudo RJ, Dromerick AW, Birkenmeier RL. Dose response of task-specific upper limb training in people at least 6 months poststroke: A phase II, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Ann Neurol. 2016 Sep;80(3):342-54. doi: 10.1002/ana.24734. Epub 2016 Aug 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27447365 (View on PubMed)

Winstein C, Kim B, Kim S, Martinez C, Schweighofer N. Dosage Matters. Stroke. 2019 Jul;50(7):1831-1837. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023603. Epub 2019 Jun 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31164067 (View on PubMed)

Park H, Kim S, Winstein CJ, Gordon J, Schweighofer N. Short-Duration and Intensive Training Improves Long-Term Reaching Performance in Individuals With Chronic Stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016 Jul;30(6):551-61. doi: 10.1177/1545968315606990. Epub 2015 Sep 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26405046 (View on PubMed)

Kantak S, McGrath R, Zahedi N, Luchmee D. Behavioral and neurophysiological mechanisms underlying motor skill learning in patients with post-stroke hemiparesis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 Jan;129(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.10.010. Epub 2017 Nov 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29127826 (View on PubMed)

Pantano P, Baron JC, Samson Y, Bousser MG, Derouesne C, Comar D. Crossed cerebellar diaschisis. Further studies. Brain. 1986 Aug;109 ( Pt 4):677-94. doi: 10.1093/brain/109.4.677.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3488093 (View on PubMed)

Kawato M, Gomi H. A computational model of four regions of the cerebellum based on feedback-error learning. Biol Cybern. 1992;68(2):95-103. doi: 10.1007/BF00201431.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1486143 (View on PubMed)

Gribble PL, Ostry DJ. Compensation for interaction torques during single- and multijoint limb movement. J Neurophysiol. 1999 Nov;82(5):2310-26. doi: 10.1152/jn.1999.82.5.2310.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10561408 (View on PubMed)

Maeda RS, Cluff T, Gribble PL, Pruszynski JA. Feedforward and Feedback Control Share an Internal Model of the Arm's Dynamics. J Neurosci. 2018 Dec 5;38(49):10505-10514. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1709-18.2018. Epub 2018 Oct 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30355628 (View on PubMed)

Darmon Y, Kantak S, Cone H, Fullmer N, Ouellette D, Winstein C, Rosario ER, Schweighofer N. Speed-Biased Training Temporarily Improves Motor Performance of the Paretic Arm Compared to Accuracy-Biased Training in Chronic Stroke Survivors: The Phase 1 FAST Randomized Clinical Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2025 Jul;39(7):542-554. doi: 10.1177/15459683251331582. Epub 2025 May 10.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40346836 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HS-CG-20-00023

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Dose Optimization for Stroke Evaluation
NCT01749358 COMPLETED PHASE1
Cognition and Motor Learning Post-stroke
NCT04829071 RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1
Neural Underpinnings of Turning
NCT05475236 COMPLETED NA