Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
44 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-06-15
2023-11-27
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Arm Rehabilitation Study After Stroke
NCT00871715
Action Selection and Arm Rehabilitation After Stroke
NCT02785419
Study to Enhance Motor Acute Recovery With Intensive Training After Stroke
NCT02292251
EMG-Controlled Game to Retrain Upper Extremity Muscle Activation Patterns Following Stroke
NCT05628324
Mechanisms of Arm Recovery in Stroke Patients With Hand Paralysis
NCT03067818
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A double-blind quasi-randomized controlled study will be carried out in chronic post-stroke survivors. Participants will be assigned to either the speed-bias training group or a dose equivalent accuracy-bias training group (control) and will receive 4 days of training over a 1week period by a trained Occupational or physical therapist. Behavioral, EMG, and MRI data will be acquired within two weeks before, 3 days post, and one month after intervention.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Speed-biased complex motor skill training
Participants will perform 400 complex movements per day over 4 days over a one-week period. The task requires participants to navigate their hand through a "track" projected on the surface of a table with a width of 5cm. Participants receive adaptive score based on their movement time. .
Fast intervention
This intervention is based on recent body of evidence that high-speed movements during training are effective at improving arm movements in individuals with chronic stroke.Participants will be rewarded for movements performed within a short amount of time.
Accuracy-biased complex motor skill training
The accuracy-biased group receives a dose equivalent intervention with a emphasize on accuracy. The width of the track projected on the table is narrower (less than 2cm) and the adaptive score received are based on their accuracy to say within the boundary of the track.
Active Monitoring
This is an observation-only group. The training received in this group will be dose equivalent to the active group.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fast intervention
This intervention is based on recent body of evidence that high-speed movements during training are effective at improving arm movements in individuals with chronic stroke.Participants will be rewarded for movements performed within a short amount of time.
Active Monitoring
This is an observation-only group. The training received in this group will be dose equivalent to the active group.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* At least 21 years of age
* Exhibit residual capability to move the paretic UE (Upper Extremity Fugl- Meyer motor score \>20/66)
* Able to follow a 2-step command (8th item on the MMSE test)
* Able to perform an unassisted arm reach movement of 25 cm ahead of the body within 5 seconds with trunk restraint
* Exhibit no greater than mild/moderate spasticity as assessed with a Modified Ashworth Score \< 3
Exclusion Criteria
* peripheral movement restrictions, such as neuropathy
* orthopedic disorders affecting the paretic UE
* severe pain or sensory/proprioceptive impairment in the more affected UE
* visual neglect (more than 4% of lines left uncrossed on Albert's test).
* had a stroke directly affecting the cerebellum
* any contra-indications to MRI scanning
* mostly resolved impairments with an Upper Extremity Fugl- Meyer motor score \>58/66
21 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare
OTHER
University of Southern California
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Carolee Winstein
Professor, Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nicolas Schweighofer, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Southern California
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare
Pomona, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lang CE, Strube MJ, Bland MD, Waddell KJ, Cherry-Allen KM, Nudo RJ, Dromerick AW, Birkenmeier RL. Dose response of task-specific upper limb training in people at least 6 months poststroke: A phase II, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Ann Neurol. 2016 Sep;80(3):342-54. doi: 10.1002/ana.24734. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
Winstein C, Kim B, Kim S, Martinez C, Schweighofer N. Dosage Matters. Stroke. 2019 Jul;50(7):1831-1837. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023603. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
Park H, Kim S, Winstein CJ, Gordon J, Schweighofer N. Short-Duration and Intensive Training Improves Long-Term Reaching Performance in Individuals With Chronic Stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016 Jul;30(6):551-61. doi: 10.1177/1545968315606990. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
Kantak S, McGrath R, Zahedi N, Luchmee D. Behavioral and neurophysiological mechanisms underlying motor skill learning in patients with post-stroke hemiparesis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 Jan;129(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.10.010. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
Pantano P, Baron JC, Samson Y, Bousser MG, Derouesne C, Comar D. Crossed cerebellar diaschisis. Further studies. Brain. 1986 Aug;109 ( Pt 4):677-94. doi: 10.1093/brain/109.4.677.
Kawato M, Gomi H. A computational model of four regions of the cerebellum based on feedback-error learning. Biol Cybern. 1992;68(2):95-103. doi: 10.1007/BF00201431.
Gribble PL, Ostry DJ. Compensation for interaction torques during single- and multijoint limb movement. J Neurophysiol. 1999 Nov;82(5):2310-26. doi: 10.1152/jn.1999.82.5.2310.
Maeda RS, Cluff T, Gribble PL, Pruszynski JA. Feedforward and Feedback Control Share an Internal Model of the Arm's Dynamics. J Neurosci. 2018 Dec 5;38(49):10505-10514. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1709-18.2018. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
Darmon Y, Kantak S, Cone H, Fullmer N, Ouellette D, Winstein C, Rosario ER, Schweighofer N. Speed-Biased Training Temporarily Improves Motor Performance of the Paretic Arm Compared to Accuracy-Biased Training in Chronic Stroke Survivors: The Phase 1 FAST Randomized Clinical Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2025 Jul;39(7):542-554. doi: 10.1177/15459683251331582. Epub 2025 May 10.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HS-CG-20-00023
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.