Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for Adults Post-Stroke With Mild Upper Extremity Impairment

NCT ID: NCT05492513

Last Updated: 2025-05-02

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: RECRUITING
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 12 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2022-12-08
• Study Completion Date: 2026-03-31

Brief Summary

Constraint-Induced Therapy (CI Therapy) is a behavioral approach to neurorehabilitation and consists of multi-components that have been applied in a systematic method to improve the use of the limb or function addressed in the intensive treatment. CI Therapy for the more-affected upper extremity (UE) post-stroke is administered in daily treatment sessions over consecutive weekdays. Sessions include motor training with repeated, timed trials using a technique called shaping, a set of behavioral strategies known as the Transfer Package (TP) to improve the use of the more-affected hand in the life situation, and strategies to remind participants to use the more-affected UE including restraint. Robust improvements in the amount and qualify of use have been realized with stroke participants from mild-to-severe UE impairment.

Detailed Description

Previous CI therapy studies have explored treatment for participants with varied levels of motor impairment from mild-to-severe that have limited use of the more-affected arm and hand in everyday activities as measured by the Motor Activity Log (MAL). The Motor Activity Log (MAL) is a standardized test used in CI therapy studies to measure the Amount of Use and the Quality of Use of the more-affected UE in the life situation. Individuals that exceed maximal criteria with a mean MAL score higher than 2.5 are typically excluded from CI therapy studies since they potentially would hit a ceiling effect on the MAL and would not be able to show a meaningful treatment change. Similarly, in a clinical setting, these individuals are often discharged from outpatient therapy as having reached the maximum benefit of traditional therapy since each can typically perform basic skills with the more-affected UE despite the disparity of continued difficulty with performing high-level motor tasks and persistent sensory deficits. However, these patients often voice strong motivation to gain more recovery and return to performing activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL)that require complex motor skills (i.e.; keyboarding, texting, utensil or tool use, musical instrument use, etc). We hypothesize that participants with mild UE movement deficits will benefit from CI therapy with focused intervention to address skills and performance of high-level tasks and outcome measures that are selected for this level of patient. We further question if adding sensory components to the CI therapy strategies will improve the participant's sensation for the more-affected UE and aid in the more-affected UE use in everyday tasks but particularly in challenging motor tasks.

Conditions

CVA (Cerebrovascular Accident); Stroke; Upper Extremity Paresis

Study Design

• Allocation Method: NA
• Intervention Model: SINGLE_GROUP
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: NONE

Study Groups

Grade 1 CI Therapy + Sensory Components

All participants will receive the Grade 1 CI Therapy + Sensory Components administered over a two-week period of time.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Grade 1 CI Therapy +Sensory Components

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

All participants will receive Grade 1 CI Therapy + Sensory Components over a two-week period of time. The treatment intervention will include all CI Therapy treatment strategies including: 1) supervised motor training in the form of shaping with repeated trials and task practice for 1.5 hours per day for 5 weekdays for 2 weeks 2) a behavioral Transfer Package (TP) will be employed to aid carry-over of skills gained by the participant in the laboratory to the life situation 3) each participant will wear a mitt on the less-affected hand for most of their waking hours to encourage use of the more-affected hand 4) participants will be given home assignments to be carried out for at least 30 minutes each day. Sensory component strategies will be added to stimulate sensory input through the more-affected arm and hand as well as to train sensory discrimination skills.

Interventions

Grade 1 CI Therapy +Sensory Components

All participants will receive Grade 1 CI Therapy + Sensory Components over a two-week period of time. The treatment intervention will include all CI Therapy treatment strategies including: 1) supervised motor training in the form of shaping with repeated trials and task practice for 1.5 hours per day for 5 weekdays for 2 weeks 2) a behavioral Transfer Package (TP) will be employed to aid carry-over of skills gained by the participant in the laboratory to the life situation 3) each participant will wear a mitt on the less-affected hand for most of their waking hours to encourage use of the more-affected hand 4) participants will be given home assignments to be carried out for at least 30 minutes each day. Sensory component strategies will be added to stimulate sensory input through the more-affected arm and hand as well as to train sensory discrimination skills.

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• At least 6 months post stroke
• The ability to demonstrate the minimum UE active movement criteria of 20 degrees of wrist extension from a fully flexed position, 10 degrees of thumb extension or abduction, and 10 degrees of extension of all finger joints.
• Mean score of >2.5 on the Motor Activity Log indicating the participant's use of the more-affected UE.

Exclusion Criteria

• Score< 24 on the Mini Mental State Exam
• Inability to answer the MAL questions and/or provide informed consent
• The inability to come in to the laboratory setting for treatment.

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

University of Alabama at Birmingham

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Mary H Bowman

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

David Morris, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Locations

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status: RECRUITING

Countries

United States

Central Contacts

Mary H Bowman, BS OT

Role: CONTACT

mbowman@uab.edu

2059340069

Facility Contacts

Mary H Bowman, BS OT

Role: primary

mbowman@uab.edu

2059340069

References

Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, Alonso A, Beaton AZ, Bittencourt MS, Boehme AK, Buxton AE, Carson AP, Commodore-Mensah Y, Elkind MSV, Evenson KR, Eze-Nliam C, Ferguson JF, Generoso G, Ho JE, Kalani R, Khan SS, Kissela BM, Knutson KL, Levine DA, Lewis TT, Liu J, Loop MS, Ma J, Mussolino ME, Navaneethan SD, Perak AM, Poudel R, Rezk-Hanna M, Roth GA, Schroeder EB, Shah SH, Thacker EL, VanWagner LB, Virani SS, Voecks JH, Wang NY, Yaffe K, Martin SS. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2022 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2022 Feb 22;145(8):e153-e639. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001052. Epub 2022 Jan 26.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 35078371 (View on PubMed)

Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, Cook EW 3rd, Fleming WC, Nepomuceno CS, Connell JS, Crago JE. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Apr;74(4):347-54.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 8466415 (View on PubMed)

Morris DM, Taub E, Mark VW. Constraint-induced movement therapy: characterizing the intervention protocol. Eura Medicophys. 2006 Sep;42(3):257-68.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 17039224 (View on PubMed)

Taub E, Uswatte G, Mark VW, Morris DM. The learned nonuse phenomenon: implications for rehabilitation. Eura Medicophys. 2006 Sep;42(3):241-56.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 17039223 (View on PubMed)

Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Light K, Thompson PA. The Motor Activity Log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology. 2006 Oct 10;67(7):1189-94. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000238164.90657.c2.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 17030751 (View on PubMed)

Morris DM, Uswatte G, Crago JE, Cook EW 3rd, Taub E. The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Jun;82(6):750-5. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.23183.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 11387578 (View on PubMed)

Toomey M, Nicholson D, Carswell A. The clinical utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Can J Occup Ther. 1995 Dec;62(5):242-9. doi: 10.1177/000841749506200503.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 10152880 (View on PubMed)

Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ. The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999 Oct;30(10):2131-40. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.10.2131.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 10512918 (View on PubMed)

Wang YP, Gorenstein C. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory-II: a comprehensive review. Braz J Psychiatry. 2013 Oct-Dec;35(4):416-31. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2012-1048. Epub 2013 Dec 23.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 24402217 (View on PubMed)

Oxford Grice K, Vogel KA, Le V, Mitchell A, Muniz S, Vollmer MA. Adult norms for a commercially available Nine Hole Peg Test for finger dexterity. Am J Occup Ther. 2003 Sep-Oct;57(5):570-3. doi: 10.5014/ajot.57.5.570.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 14527120 (View on PubMed)

Serrada I, Hordacre B, Hillier SL. Does Sensory Retraining Improve Sensation and Sensorimotor Function Following Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Neurosci. 2019 Apr 30;13:402. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00402. eCollection 2019.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 31114472 (View on PubMed)

Wu CY, Chuang IC, Ma HI, Lin KC, Chen CL. Validity and Responsiveness of the Revised Nottingham Sensation Assessment for Outcome Evaluation in Stroke Rehabilitation. Am J Occup Ther. 2016 Mar-Apr;70(2):7002290040p1-8. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2016.018390.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 26943116 (View on PubMed)

Suda M, Kawakami M, Okuyama K, Ishii R, Oshima O, Hijikata N, Nakamura T, Oka A, Kondo K, Liu M. Validity and Reliability of the Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Test and the Thumb Localizing Test in Patients With Stroke. Front Neurol. 2021 Jan 27;11:625917. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.625917. eCollection 2020.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 33584520 (View on PubMed)

Andrabi M, Taub E, Mckay Bishop S, Morris D, Uswatte G. Acceptability of constraint induced movement therapy: influence of perceived difficulty and expected treatment outcome. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2022 Oct;29(7):507-515. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2021.1956046. Epub 2021 Aug 23.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 34425065 (View on PubMed)

Taub E, Uswatte G, Mark VW, Morris DM, Barman J, Bowman MH, Bryson C, Delgado A, Bishop-McKay S. Method for enhancing real-world use of a more affected arm in chronic stroke: transfer package of constraint-induced movement therapy. Stroke. 2013 May;44(5):1383-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000559. Epub 2013 Mar 21.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 23520237 (View on PubMed)

Patel P, Kaingade SR, Wilcox A, Lodha N. Force control predicts fine motor dexterity in high-functioning stroke survivors. Neurosci Lett. 2020 Jun 11;729:135015. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135015. Epub 2020 Apr 30.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 32360934 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

IRB-300008653

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id