"Reliability of Motricity Index Strength Assessments for Upper Extremity in Post Stroke Hemiparesis- a Correlation Study''
NCT ID: NCT02353520
Last Updated: 2015-02-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
20 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2013-06-30
2014-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
For inter-rater reliability, Before the beginning of Procedure both the raters were familiarized with the motricity index. The motricity index was administered by two different raters on the same subjects within 2 days who were blind to each others results and heir results were recorded separately.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Improving Independent Multi-joint Arm Control After Stroke
NCT06523335
Study of the Recovery of Muscle Function in the Arm/Hand After a Stroke
NCT01422005
A Clinical Trial to Study the Effect of Imagined Progressive Movements in Patients With Paralysis of One Side of the Body.
NCT02232295
The Application of Kinesio Taping Technique in the Early Upper Limb Functional Activities Induction of Hemiplegic Patients After Stroke
NCT06834750
Kinesiotaping and Constraint Induced Movement Therapy in Subacute Stroke
NCT03682666
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
For inter-rater reliability, Before the beginning of Procedure both the raters were familiarized with the motricity index. The motricity index was administered by two different raters on the same subjects within 2 days who were blind to each others results and heir results were recorded separately.
PATIENT POSITION The patient was sitting on a chair or on the edge of the bed, but can be tested lying supine if necessary. In the arm the three movements tested were pinch grip, elbow flexion and shoulder abduction.
Pinch grip Assessed by asking the patient to grip a 2.5 cm cube between the thumb and fore finger. The object was on a flat surface (for example, a book).
The tester scored contraction of any forearm or small hand muscles as follows:
0 No movement. 11 Beginnings of prehension (any movement of finger or thumb). 19 Able to grip the cube, but not hold it against gravity (examiner may need to lift the wrist) 22 Able to grip and hold the cube against gravity, but not against a weak pull.
26 Able to grip and hold the cube against a weak pull, but weaker than the other side.
33 Normal pinch grips. Elbow flexion The elbow was tested with the elbow flexed to 90°, forearm horizontal and upper arm vertical. The patient was asked to bend the elbow so that the hand touches the shoulder. The examiner resisted with a hand on the wrist, and monitored the biceps. If there was no movement, the examiner holded the elbow out so that the arm was horizontal, and gave a score of 14 if movement was then seen.
Shoulder abduction The elbow was fully flexed and against the chest and the patient was asked to abduct the arm. The examiner monitored contraction of the deltoid movement of shoulder girdle does not count-there must be movement of humerus in relation to scapula). A score of 19 was given when the shoulder was abducted to more than 90◦ beyond the horizontal against gravity but not against resistance.
According to the quality of muscle contraction the score was recorded. Rater was also aware of any trick motion such as leaning the back during the movement by placing one hand on their back. Finally, all three scores were summed and the Motricity Index for upper extremity was calculated.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
motricity index strength assessment
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age 37 to 76 years.
3. Mini mental status examination score ≥ 23.
4. Individuals having Brunnstrom stage 4 and 5 in upper extremity.
5. Individuals should not be taking any physiotherapy treatment for stroke
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patient having any musculo-skeletal disorder in upper limb.
3. Patient having any trauma on their upper extremity.
4. Patient having any neurological disorder other than stroke.
5. Any hypersensitivity or hyposensitivity disorder
37 Years
76 Years
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Maharishi Markendeswar University (Deemed to be University)
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
ASHIMA ARORA
ASHIMA ARORA
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dr. Senthil P Kumar, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
MMIPR
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RELIBILITY OF MOTRICITY INDEX
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.