"Reliability of Motricity Index Strength Assessments for Upper Extremity in Post Stroke Hemiparesis- a Correlation Study''

NCT ID: NCT02353520

Last Updated: 2015-02-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-06-30

Study Completion Date

2014-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Initially, a written consent was obtained from each participant. Then they became familiar with the procedure. For intrarater reliability, the first rater assessed the strength of pinch grip, elbow flexion and shoulder abduction in three different sessions at short intervals on same day in same environmental conditions. All the assessments were performed on the same day in three sessions. Assessment duration of all the sessions was 5 minutes.

For inter-rater reliability, Before the beginning of Procedure both the raters were familiarized with the motricity index. The motricity index was administered by two different raters on the same subjects within 2 days who were blind to each others results and heir results were recorded separately.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Initially, a written consent was obtained from each participant. Then they became familiar with the procedure. For intrarater reliability, the first rater assessed the strength of pinch grip, elbow flexion and shoulder abduction in three different sessions at short intervals on same day in same environmental conditions. All the assessments were performed on the same day in three sessions. Assessment duration of all the sessions was 5 minutes.

For inter-rater reliability, Before the beginning of Procedure both the raters were familiarized with the motricity index. The motricity index was administered by two different raters on the same subjects within 2 days who were blind to each others results and heir results were recorded separately.

PATIENT POSITION The patient was sitting on a chair or on the edge of the bed, but can be tested lying supine if necessary. In the arm the three movements tested were pinch grip, elbow flexion and shoulder abduction.

Pinch grip Assessed by asking the patient to grip a 2.5 cm cube between the thumb and fore finger. The object was on a flat surface (for example, a book).

The tester scored contraction of any forearm or small hand muscles as follows:

0 No movement. 11 Beginnings of prehension (any movement of finger or thumb). 19 Able to grip the cube, but not hold it against gravity (examiner may need to lift the wrist) 22 Able to grip and hold the cube against gravity, but not against a weak pull.

26 Able to grip and hold the cube against a weak pull, but weaker than the other side.

33 Normal pinch grips. Elbow flexion The elbow was tested with the elbow flexed to 90°, forearm horizontal and upper arm vertical. The patient was asked to bend the elbow so that the hand touches the shoulder. The examiner resisted with a hand on the wrist, and monitored the biceps. If there was no movement, the examiner holded the elbow out so that the arm was horizontal, and gave a score of 14 if movement was then seen.

Shoulder abduction The elbow was fully flexed and against the chest and the patient was asked to abduct the arm. The examiner monitored contraction of the deltoid movement of shoulder girdle does not count-there must be movement of humerus in relation to scapula). A score of 19 was given when the shoulder was abducted to more than 90◦ beyond the horizontal against gravity but not against resistance.

According to the quality of muscle contraction the score was recorded. Rater was also aware of any trick motion such as leaning the back during the movement by placing one hand on their back. Finally, all three scores were summed and the Motricity Index for upper extremity was calculated.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

motricity index strength assessment

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Post stroke hemiparetic patients were included in the study.
2. Age 37 to 76 years.
3. Mini mental status examination score ≥ 23.
4. Individuals having Brunnstrom stage 4 and 5 in upper extremity.
5. Individuals should not be taking any physiotherapy treatment for stroke

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients at the acute or chronic commonly seen at clinics.
2. Patient having any musculo-skeletal disorder in upper limb.
3. Patient having any trauma on their upper extremity.
4. Patient having any neurological disorder other than stroke.
5. Any hypersensitivity or hyposensitivity disorder
Minimum Eligible Age

37 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

76 Years

Eligible Sex

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Maharishi Markendeswar University (Deemed to be University)

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

ASHIMA ARORA

ASHIMA ARORA

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dr. Senthil P Kumar, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

MMIPR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RELIBILITY OF MOTRICITY INDEX

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Kinesio Taping in Stroke Patient
NCT06188845 COMPLETED NA