Positioning the Trunk and Upper Limb to Improve the Coordination of the Hand Movement After Stroke

NCT ID: NCT04782141

Last Updated: 2021-03-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

277 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-08-05

Study Completion Date

2020-03-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study investigated how torso and shoulder positioning can help restore coordinated hand movements in stroke patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Stroke patients and healthy subjects were randomly divided into two different groups and tested in different positions. In study group 1, the exercise test consisted of two motor tasks carried out in two different starting positions: sitting and supine. During the first examination, the subject sat on the therapeutic table (without back support), feet resting on the floor (active stabilization of the trunk and shoulder). The upper limb was examined in adduction, with the elbow bent in the intermediate position between pronation and supination of the forearm. In the supine position, the upper limb was held beside the subject's body (adduction in the humeral joint, elbow flexion in the intermediate position; passive stabilization of the trunk and shoulder).

In study group 2, the exercise test again consisted of two motor tasks carried out in two different starting positions: supine with the upper extremity positioned perpendicularly to the trunk (passive stabilization of the trunk, active stabilization of the shoulder), and supine with the upper limb held beside the subject's body (adduction in the humeral joint, elbow flexion in the intermediate position; passive stabilization of the trunk and shoulder).

A manual electronic dynamometer (EH 101) was used for grip strength measurement (error of measurement, 0.5 kg/lb). A Hand Tutor device (composed of a safe and comfortable glove equipped with position and motion sensors, and the Medi Tutor(TM) software) was used to measure the range of passive and active movement (error of measurement, 5 - 10 mm), as well as the speed/frequency of movement (error of measurement, 0,5 cycle/sec.).

First, the range of passive movement in the radial-carpal joint (flexion and extension) and fingers (global flexion and extension) was measured in each position using the Hand Tutor Device. Then the subject made active movements in the same order. Finally, the subject was asked to make moves as quickly and in as full a range as possible. The measurement of grip strength with a dynamometer was performed in each position after the range of motion and speed/frequency tests.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Positioning the trunk and upper limb to improve the coordination the hand.

The study investigated the effects of the trunk and upper limb positioning on improving wrist and hand coordination.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

hand motor coordination in a sitting positin

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The subject sat on the therapeutic table (without back support), feet resting on the floor. The upper limb was examined in adduction, with the elbow bent in the intermediate position between pronation and supination of the forearm. Wrist and a hand free from stabilization.

hand motor coordination in a supine position with the upper extremity positioned perpendicularly to the trunk

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

motor tasks carried out in starting positions: supine with the upper extremity positioned perpendicularly to the trunk; the upper limb in adduction and flexion in the humeral joint, elbow extension, forearm in the intermediate position; elbow, wrist, hand free from stabilization.

hand motor coordination in a supine position with adduction in the humeral joint, elbow flexion in the intermediate position

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In the supine position, the upper limb was held beside the subject's body (adduction in the humeral joint, elbow flexion in the intermediate position between pronation and supination of the forearm. Wrist and a hand free from stabilization.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

hand motor coordination in a sitting positin

The subject sat on the therapeutic table (without back support), feet resting on the floor. The upper limb was examined in adduction, with the elbow bent in the intermediate position between pronation and supination of the forearm. Wrist and a hand free from stabilization.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

hand motor coordination in a supine position with the upper extremity positioned perpendicularly to the trunk

motor tasks carried out in starting positions: supine with the upper extremity positioned perpendicularly to the trunk; the upper limb in adduction and flexion in the humeral joint, elbow extension, forearm in the intermediate position; elbow, wrist, hand free from stabilization.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

hand motor coordination in a supine position with adduction in the humeral joint, elbow flexion in the intermediate position

In the supine position, the upper limb was held beside the subject's body (adduction in the humeral joint, elbow flexion in the intermediate position between pronation and supination of the forearm. Wrist and a hand free from stabilization.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\-

Exclusion Criteria

Control Group


\-
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

87 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Military Institute od Medicine National Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Anna Olczak

PhD; Senior Specjalit of the Rehabilitation Clinc

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Anna Olczak, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Rehabilitation Clinic, Military Institute of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Military Institute of Medicine

Warsaw, Masovian District, Poland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Poland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

5/KRN/2020

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Hand Rehabilitation Study for Stroke Patients
NCT03148106 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA