Effects of Home-based Neurostimulation Associated With Motor Training in Chronic Stroke Patients

NCT ID: NCT01034150

Last Updated: 2009-12-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-12-31

Study Completion Date

2009-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Objective: To investigate effects of home-based somatosensory stimulation associated with motor training on improvement in performance of the paretic upper extremity in patients in the chronic phase after stroke.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Design: Double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Setting: Home-based rehabilitation. Subjects: Patients in the chronic phase (\> 6 months) after stroke. Interventions: Patients will be randomized to an active and a control group. In both groups, treatments will be performed at home, daily, over four weeks. Patients in the active group will be instructed to use a device that provides somatosensory stimulation in the form of electrical stimulation of the median nerve for two hours. Patients in the control group will also be instructed to use the device for two hours, and sham stimulation will be administered. In both groups, patients will be instructed to train activities with the paretic hand immediately after nerve stimulation.

Main measures: The primary outcome will be improvement in performance of the paretic hand evaluated by the Jebsen-Taylor test at end of treatment and four months after end of treatment, compared to baseline. Secondary outcomes were: 1) Compliance with the interventions, assessed through a daily written log, and oral reports of the patients; 2) safety profile of the interventions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Somatosensory stimulation

Active group

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Relief band (Somatosensory stimulation)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Electrical median nerve stimulation

Control group

Placebo stimulation

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Placebo stimulation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Relief band (Somatosensory stimulation)

Electrical median nerve stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Placebo stimulation

Placebo stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Relief band no stimulation

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age 18-80 years;
* single ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke in a cerebral hemisphere, documented by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI);
* stroke onset at least six months before;
* hand paresis with preserved ability to perform all tasks of the Jebsen-Taylor Test (JTT).

Exclusion Criteria

* previous strokes;
* epilepsy and other neurological conditions;
* proprioceptive or tactile anesthesia;
* shoulder or hand pain;
* severe joint deformity;
* severe chronic disease;
* inability to give provide informed consent due to severe aphasia or cognitive impairment;
* left handedness before the stroke.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hospital das Clinicas/University of Sao Paulo

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Adriana Conforto, MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital das Clínicas/FMUSP

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of São Paulo/General Hospital

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

477916/06-6

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

1309-06

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id