Peripheral Nerve Stimulation and Motor Training in Stroke

NCT ID: NCT02658578

Last Updated: 2021-07-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

38 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-03-31

Study Completion Date

2021-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Cerebrovascular disease is a major cause of disability worldwide. The catastrophic burden of stroke is more dramatic in low- and middle- income countries, and the scarcity of evidence-based rehabilitation interventions represents a major challenge to global health care. Upper limb weakness is frequent after stroke, but there is no universally accepted treatment to effectively improve hand function in patients with moderate and severe motor impairment. These are the patients in deepest need of rehabilitative interventions. This project addresses this important issue, by testing effects of a novel approach. The investigators will non-invasively stimulate peripheral nerves in order to enhance effects of motor training aided by an electrical stimulation device in patients with moderate to severe hand weakness. Our hypothesis is that peripheral nerve stimulation will enhance effects of motor training in patients in the chronic stage after stroke.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The objective of this protocol is to determine whether a neuromodulation intervention associated with functional electrical stimulation, when combined with task-specific training over several sessions, decreases upper limb motor disability, motor impairment, overall disability and improves quality of life compared to the sham intervention and functional electrical stimulation.

The interventions will consist of three sessions per week, over six weeks, of outpatient functional electrical stimulation of the paretic wrist and task-specific training. In each session, either active peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) or sham PNS will be applied. Before the first session, patients will be familiarized with the procedures.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Active PNS

Active PNS will be administered by 2 pairs of surface electrodes (cathode proximal). One pair will overly the median and ulnar nerves at the wrist, and the other pair will overly the radial nerve. Trains of electric stimulation will be delivered at 1 Hz by using isolation units connected to a square pulse stimulator.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

PNS

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Active PNS will be administered by 2 pairs of surface electrodes (cathode proximal). One pair will overly the median and ulnar nerves at the wrist, and the other pair will overly the radial nerve. Trains of electric stimulation will be delivered at 1 Hz by using isolation units connected to a square pulse stimulator. In sham PNS, the median, ulnar and radial nerves will not be actively stimulated.

Sham PNS

In sham PNS, the median, ulnar and radial nerves will not be actively stimulated.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

PNS

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Active PNS will be administered by 2 pairs of surface electrodes (cathode proximal). One pair will overly the median and ulnar nerves at the wrist, and the other pair will overly the radial nerve. Trains of electric stimulation will be delivered at 1 Hz by using isolation units connected to a square pulse stimulator. In sham PNS, the median, ulnar and radial nerves will not be actively stimulated.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PNS

Active PNS will be administered by 2 pairs of surface electrodes (cathode proximal). One pair will overly the median and ulnar nerves at the wrist, and the other pair will overly the radial nerve. Trains of electric stimulation will be delivered at 1 Hz by using isolation units connected to a square pulse stimulator. In sham PNS, the median, ulnar and radial nerves will not be actively stimulated.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Peripheral Nerve Stimulation

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age, 18 years or older;
* Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke at least six months before, confirmed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging;
* Moderate to severe motor impairment of an upper limb, defined as a score between 7 and 50 on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Sensorimotor Recovery after stroke, a scale with scores for upper limb ranging from 0 (no function) to 66 (normal function);
* Ability to provide written Informed Consent (patient or legal representative);
* Ability to comply with the schedule of interventions and evaluations in the protocol.

Exclusion Criteria

* Lack of ability to voluntarily activate any active range of wrist extension;
* Anesthesia of the paretic hand;
* Severe spasticity at the paretic elbow, wrist, or fingers, defined as a score of \>3 on the Modified Ashworth Spasticity Scale;
* Active joint deformity;
* Uncontrolled medical problems such as end-stage cancer or renal disease;
* Pregnancy;
* Seizures, if current use of drugs that may decrease seizure threshold such as tryciclic antidepressants;
* Pacemakers;
* Other neurological disorders such as Parkinson's disease;
* Psychiatric illness including severe depression;
* Aphasia or serious cognitive deficits that preclude comprehension of the experimental protocol or ability to provide consent;
* Treatment of upper limb spasticity with botulinum toxin within the past three months.
* Lesions that affect the cerebellum or cerebelar/vestibular pathways in the brainstem
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fundação Faculdade de Medicina

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Cleveland Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Adriana Bastos Conforto

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Adriana Conforto, MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo/ Fundação Faculdade de Medicina

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo/Fundação Faculdade de Medicina

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Conforto AB, Machado AG, Ribeiro NHV, Plow EB, Liew SL, da Costa Leite C, Zavaliangos-Petropulu A, Menezes I, Dos Anjos SM, Luccas R, Peckham PH, Cohen LG. Repetitive Peripheral Sensory Stimulation as an Add-On Intervention for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke: A Randomized Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2021 Dec;35(12):1059-1064. doi: 10.1177/15459683211046259. Epub 2021 Sep 29.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34587830 (View on PubMed)

Conforto AB, Machado AG, Menezes I, Ribeiro NHV, Luccas R, Pires DS, Leite CDC, Plow EB, Cohen LG. Treatment of Upper Limb Paresis With Repetitive Peripheral Nerve Sensory Stimulation and Motor Training: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Neurol. 2020 Mar 25;11:196. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00196. eCollection 2020.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32269549 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01NS076348

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

0546/2011

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Hand Rehabilitation Study for Stroke Patients
NCT03148106 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
BCI Post-stroke Neurorehabilitation
NCT02404857 COMPLETED NA