Study of Hemodynamic Markers of Upper Extremity Motor Dysfunction in Stroke Patients Using Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS)

NCT ID: NCT06806397

Last Updated: 2025-02-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-06-26

Study Completion Date

2025-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study was to explore potential pathways for recovery and adaptation of the motor cortex by examining cerebral blood flow characteristics and hemodynamic markers analyzed by functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) in patients with hemiparesis after stroke. Participants in the study performed a simple stimulus-response task several times with one healthy and one paralyzed limb at different stages of basic rehabilitation. A group of healthy, age-matched volunteers participated in the same experiment to verify the stroke-related changes. The researchers recorded fNIRS signals, muscle activity using electromyography, and heart activity using electrocardiography.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study included 40 participants, divided into two groups: individuals with a history of stroke-related hemiparesis and a matched healthy control group.Participants were instructed to perform a stimulus-response task designed to assess reaction speed.During the task, they positioned their hands within a designated box equipped with two buttons corresponding to left and right responses. A visual stimulus, presented via LEDs located above the buttons, served as the response target. A flash of a stimulus required participants to respond by extending their fingers to press the corresponding button. If limb paresis prevented a full button press, participants were instructed to form an intention to move and attempt the task to the best of their ability.

Neurophysiological data acquisition. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) data were acquired using a combined NIRSport 16x16 and NIRSport 8x8 system (NIRx Medizintechnik GmbH, Berlin, Germany).Twenty-four sources and 24 detectors were placed over the sensorimotor area and adjacent regions, forming 76 source-detector pairs to ensure comprehensive cortical coverage. The light sources were activated synchronously, resulting in a sampling rate of 13.56 Hz. In addition, surface electromyography (EMG), electrocardiography (ECG), and scalp electroencephalography (EEG) were recorded using the NVX-36 electroencephalograph (ISS, Zelenograd, Russia). EMG activity was recorded from the extensor digitorum communis muscle of both hands using a bipolar belly-tendon montage. ECG was recorded by 1st standard bipolar montage with electrode placed on both wrists. EEG was recorded with 6 electrodes placed at 'FCC3', 'FCC4', 'CCP3', 'CCP4', 'FCC5', 'A1', 'FCC6', 'A2' according to the standard "10-05" montage. The experimental protocol was completed within two weeks for each participant. There were six sessions (3 at the beginning of rehabilitation and 3 before discharge). Each session lasted a maximum of one hour. Before the experimental session, each patient's motor abilities were tested using the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) scale.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke Stroke with Hemiparesis Stroke, Ischemic

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Individuals after stroke

Stimulus response task

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Participants were tasked with performing a finger extension exercise that required pressing buttons in response to visual stimuli. In cases where physical movement was not possible, participants were instructed to imagine performing the task while focusing on their fingers.

Healthy volunteers

Stimulus response task

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Participants were tasked with performing a finger extension exercise that required pressing buttons in response to visual stimuli. In cases where physical movement was not possible, participants were instructed to imagine performing the task while focusing on their fingers.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Stimulus response task

Participants were tasked with performing a finger extension exercise that required pressing buttons in response to visual stimuli. In cases where physical movement was not possible, participants were instructed to imagine performing the task while focusing on their fingers.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Signed written informed consent.
2. People after the first acute cerebrovascular accident (CVA), early or late rehabilitation period.
3. The level of severity of paresis of the upper limb from 3 points to 0 (according to a 6-point neurological scale)
4. The minimum visual acuity is not lower than 0.2 on the Sivtsev scale.
5. The ability and willingness of the patient to comply with the requirements of this protocol.
6. Expressed patient motivation for rehabilitation.

Exclusion Criteria

1. The presence of superficial injury of head (S00-S09 International Classification of Diseases 10 (ICD-10).
2. The presence of mental, behavioural disorders (F00-F99 ICD-10).
3. Drug addiction in the past or at the moment.
4. The presence of diseases of the nervous system (G00-G99 ICD-10).
5. . History of intracranial injury (S06 ICD-10) or stroke (I64 ICD-10).
6. The presence of somatoform disorders (F45 ICD-10).
8. Presence of electrical and/or metallic implants or stimulants in the body (eg, implanted deep brain stimulation devices, pacemakers, hearing aids and cochlear implants, intracranial metal implants).
9. Pregnancy
10. The presence of malignant neoplasms (C00-C97 ICD-10).

For stroke patients:


1. Severe cognitive impairment (\<10 points according to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale).
2. Hamilton score above 18 points.
3. The score on the Rankin scale is above 4 points.
4. Associated neurological disorders that cause decreased muscle strength or increased muscle tone in the upper limbs (eg, cerebral palsy, brain damage from trauma) or stiffness (eg, Parkinson's disease, contracture).
5. Late stages of arthritis or clinically significant limitation of passive range of motion in any of the joints studied in the study due to other reasons.
6. The absence of a part of the upper limb due to amputation caused by various reasons.
7. Any medical condition, including mental illness or epilepsy, that may affect the interpretation of study results, study conduct, or patient safety.
8. Alcohol abuse, medical marijuana use, or recreational drug use in the 12 months prior to Visit 1.
9. Use of experimental drugs or medical devices within 30 days prior to Visit 1.
10. Lack of ability to follow study procedures, in the opinion of the investigator.
11. The severity of the patient's condition according to the neurological or somatic status, which does not allow full rehabilitation.
12. Severe visual disturbances, minimal visual acuity less than 0.2 Sivtsev visual acuity table.
13. Unstable angina and/or heart attack within the previous month
14. Repeated stroke.
15. Severe unilateral spatial neglect.
16. Uncontrolled arterial hypertension
17. Ataxia
18. All forms of epilepsy
Minimum Eligible Age

35 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies of the Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (Skoltech)

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status COMPLETED

Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (Skoltech)

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Russia

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Daria Petrova, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+7 915 420 5113

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

21-75-30024

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

Skoltech-CNBR7

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.