Study of Neurophysiological Markers of Motor Recovery in Post-stroke Patients.

NCT ID: NCT06386627

Last Updated: 2024-05-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-07-01

Study Completion Date

2024-03-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study was to explore potential pathways for recovery and adaptation of neural pathways after stroke by examining electrical activity of the brain cortex and cortico-spinal excitability using transcranial magnetic stimulation in people with motor impairment after stroke. Participants in the study performed a simple stimulus-response task with a healthy and a paralysed limb several times at different stages of basic rehabilitation. To compare the data, a group of healthy volunteers took part in a similar experiment. Investigators recorded cortical activity using electroencephalography and muscle activity using electromyography. After the stimulus-response task, investigators also carried out a study using transcranial magnetic stimulation to assess the integrity of corticospinal connections.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study involved 40 participants, half of whom had suffered a stroke with hemiparesis and the other half a control group of healthy volunteers. During the experimental session, the participants have to perform a motor task involving reaction speed. A box with two buttons (right and left) is placed in front of the participant. The participant's hands are placed in the box under the buttons. The experimental task is to press one of the two buttons by extending the fingers in response to a visual stimulus - lamps above the buttons. If the degree of damage to the motor function of one of the participant's limbs does not allow a full button to be pressed, the participants is asked to form an intention for this movement and try to perform it. At the same time, one of the buttons has been designated as a 'target' for the patient, and it is in response to its highlighting that a movement is to be performed. The second button is 'non-target'. Its highlighting should be ignored. Throughout the session, each of the buttons was designated as a target several times.

Throughout the session, the electroencephalogram (EEG) signal was recorded in 17 electrodes placed on the scalp according to the international "10-10" registration system. The recording was performed with a medical electroencephalograph NVX-36 ("Medical Computer Systems", Zelenograd, Russia). Electromyographic (EMG) activity of the flexor digitorum superficialis muscles of both hands was also recorded using surface electrodes. The EMG is recorded with the same amplifier as the EEG signal (NVX-36). The participant takes part in the test within 2 weeks. There were two sessions (at the beginning of rehabilitation and before discharge). Each session lasts a maximum of one hour.

Before the study, the participants' motor activity was tested using the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). The EEG data were analysed for markers such as movement-related potentials and movement-related desynchronisation of alpha and beta rhythms. Some participants were also invited to take part in an additional study using transcranial magnetic stimulation to assess the integrity of corticospinal connections.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Post-stroke persons

Stimulus response task

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Participants were tasked with performing a finger extension exercise that required pressing buttons in response to visual stimuli. In cases where physical movement was not possible, participants were instructed to imagine performing the task while focusing on their fingers.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Transcranial magnetic stimulation to assess the integrity of corticospinal connections

Healthy volunteers

Stimulus response task

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Participants were tasked with performing a finger extension exercise that required pressing buttons in response to visual stimuli. In cases where physical movement was not possible, participants were instructed to imagine performing the task while focusing on their fingers.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Stimulus response task

Participants were tasked with performing a finger extension exercise that required pressing buttons in response to visual stimuli. In cases where physical movement was not possible, participants were instructed to imagine performing the task while focusing on their fingers.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Transcranial magnetic stimulation to assess the integrity of corticospinal connections

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Signed written informed consent.
2. People after the first acute cerebrovascular accident (CVA), early or late rehabilitation period.
3. The level of severity of paresis of the upper limb from 3 points to 0 (according to a 6-point neurological scale)
4. The minimum visual acuity is not lower than 0.2 on the Sivtsev scale.
5. The ability and willingness of the patient to comply with the requirements of this protocol.
6. Expressed patient motivation for rehabilitation.

Exclusion Criteria

1. The presence of superficial injury of head (S00-S09 International Classification of Diseases 10 (ICD-10).
2. The presence of mental, behavioural disorders (F00-F99 ICD-10).
3. Drug addiction in the past or at the moment.
4. The presence of diseases of the nervous system (G00-G99 ICD-10).
5. . History of intracranial injury (S06 ICD-10) or stroke (I64 ICD-10).
6. The presence of somatoform disorders (F45 ICD-10).
8. Presence of electrical and/or metallic implants or stimulants in the body (eg, implanted deep brain stimulation devices, pacemakers, hearing aids and cochlear implants, intracranial metal implants).
9. Pregnancy
10. The presence of malignant neoplasms (C00-C97 ICD-10).

For stroke patients:


1. Severe cognitive impairment (\<10 points according to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale).
2. Hamilton score above 18 points.
3. The score on the Rankin scale is above 4 points.
4. Associated neurological disorders that cause decreased muscle strength or increased muscle tone in the upper limbs (eg, cerebral palsy, brain damage from trauma) or stiffness (eg, Parkinson's disease, contracture).
5. Late stages of arthritis or clinically significant limitation of passive range of motion in any of the joints studied in the study due to other reasons.
6. The absence of a part of the upper limb due to amputation caused by various reasons.
7. Any medical condition, including mental illness or epilepsy, that may affect the interpretation of study results, study conduct, or patient safety.
8. Alcohol abuse, medical marijuana use, or recreational drug use in the 12 months prior to Visit 1.
9. Use of experimental drugs or medical devices within 30 days prior to Visit 1.
10. Lack of ability to follow study procedures, in the opinion of the investigator.
11. The severity of the patient's condition according to the neurological or somatic status, which does not allow full rehabilitation.
12. Severe visual disturbances, minimal visual acuity less than 0.2 Sivtsev visual acuity table.
13. Unstable angina and/or heart attack within the previous month
14. Repeated stroke.
15. Severe unilateral spatial neglect.
16. Uncontrolled arterial hypertension
17. Ataxia
18. All forms of epilepsy
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Federal center of brain research and neurotechnologies, FMBA, Moscow, Russia

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (Skoltech)

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Russia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

21-75-30024

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

Skoltech-CNBR3

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cognitive Training in Stroke Patients
NCT03644290 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA