Enhancing Recovery of Arm Movement in Stroke Patients

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-06-30

Study Completion Date

2021-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Many people who have had a stroke have problems recovering the use of their affected arm and these problems may persist for a long time. The investigators' research will test new ways to boost recovery by using non-painful brain stimulation together with training of arm movements using basic science principles. The training program will be done using the latest technology in rehabilitation such as virtual reality and robotics. The investigators will compare three groups of patients who have had a stroke. Each group will receive different combinations of brain stimulation and arm training. Another aspect of this proposal is that the investigators will do the same training programs in three different countries - Canada, Israel and India. In this way, the investigators will combine knowledge and skills to create training programs that can be applied anywhere in the world and that are not necessarily limited to high-income countries. Also, by combining expertise, the investigators will help to build the capacity to do research in India, a middle-income country that has great potential to contribute new knowledge to rehabilitation medicine.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Spinal Plasticity to Enhance Motor Retraining After Stroke

NCT03645122

Stroke Cerebrovascular Accident Hemiparesis

COMPLETED NA

Mechanisms of Arm Recovery in Stroke Patients With Hand Paralysis

NCT03067818

Stroke Hemiparesis Cerebral Vascular Accident +1 more

COMPLETED NA

Brain Stimulation and Tailored Interventions to Promote Recovery in Stroke Survivors

NCT02915185

Stroke

COMPLETED NA

Safety and Effectiveness of Cortical Stimulation in the Treatment of Stroke Patients With Upper Extremity Hemiparesis

NCT00170716

Stroke Hemiparesis

UNKNOWN PHASE3

Perceptual-motor Interaction to Improve Bimanual Coordination After Stroke

NCT03755076

Stroke

COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Training approaches based on established principles of motor learning and neural plasticity and non-invasive brain stimulation such as repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) show promise in modulating brain activity in order to enhance upper limb (UL) motor recovery. However, the potential for recovery may still not be attained if training programs do not specifically focus on remediating motor impairment as defined by motor control science. This project is driven by a major theory of motor control (Threshold Control Theory) suggesting that rather than directly specifying motor commands to muscles, descending systems regulate spatial thresholds (STs) of reflexes to generate and control voluntary movement within specific areas of joint space. In patients with stroke, ST control is diminished leading to the appearance of muscle spasticity, weakness and abnormal muscle activation patterns during voluntary movement within well-defined spatial (angular) zones. The investigators hypothesize that recovery of voluntary motor control is tightly linked to the recovery of threshold control. The investigators propose a training program that incorporates personalized tDCS to balance cortical hypo/hyperexcitability as well as personalized movement arm reaching training based on the identification of disorders in ST.

Overall objectives of the proposal are:

1. To test the effectiveness of personalized training programs to increase the range of regulation of STs in the elbow during reaching.
2. To determine the effects of repetitive tDCS aimed at inhibiting excessive/exciting diminished cortical activity.
3. To determine the feasibility of implementing personalized training programs in high and low-to-middle income countries.

Sixty patients with sub-acute (3 wks-6 mos) stroke will be recruited in this multi-site international trial taking place in Canada, Israel and India. Participants will have spasticity in the elbow flexors and/or extensors, with some active elbow control. Each site will recruit and randomize patients into one of 3 treatment groups. Group 1 will receive tDCS and practice personalized arm motor training. Group 2 will also receive tDCS with non-specific practice. Group 3 will receive Sham-tDCS and personalized practice. Training will consist of the application of tDCS in the first 30 minutes of a 50-minute arm reaching practice session,, 5 days per week for 2 weeks. Primary outcome measures (Pre, Post, Follow-up) are elbow flexor and extensor STs and related spasticity/active control zones. Secondary measures are clinical measures of UL motor activity. By accounting for the spatial structure of motor deficits, our research will benefit both researchers and clinicians by advancing our understanding of the mechanisms underlying unimpaired/impaired motor control and recovery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke Arm Paresis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

tDCS + personalized practice

Transcranial direct current stimulation and personalized arm motor training limited to active control zones, 1 hour per day, 5 days per week for 2 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

tDCS

Intervention Type DEVICE

Application of 1.5 mA tDCS for 30 minutes

personalized practice

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

arm exercise consisting of whole arm movement within a restricted elbow range of motion

tDCS + non-personalized practice

Transcranial direct current stimulation and non-personalized arm motor training spanning both active control and spasticity zones, 1 hour per day, 5 days per week for 2 weeks

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

tDCS

Intervention Type DEVICE

Application of 1.5 mA tDCS for 30 minutes

non-personalized practice

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

arm exercise consisting of unrestricted whole arm movement

sham tDCS + personalized practice

Sham transcranial direct current stimulation and personalized arm motor training limited to active control zones, 1 hour per day, 5 days per week for 2 weeks

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

sham tDCS

Intervention Type DEVICE

Application of sham tDCS for 30 minutes

personalized practice

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

arm exercise consisting of whole arm movement within a restricted elbow range of motion

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

tDCS

Application of 1.5 mA tDCS for 30 minutes

Intervention Type DEVICE

sham tDCS

Application of sham tDCS for 30 minutes

Intervention Type DEVICE

personalized practice

arm exercise consisting of whole arm movement within a restricted elbow range of motion

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

non-personalized practice

arm exercise consisting of unrestricted whole arm movement

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. first ever cortical or cortical/subcortical stroke confirmed by MRI/CT and medically stable;
2. sub-acute stage of stroke (3 wk to 6 mo post-stroke);
3. arm paresis (Chedoke-McMaster Arm Scale of 2-6 /7; Gowland et al. 1993) but able to perform voluntary elbow flexion/extension of at least 30° per direction;
4. elbow flexor and/or extensor spasticity (\> 1+/4 on Modified Ashworth Scale; Ashworth 1964; Bohannon and Smith 1987);
5. able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. major neurological (other than stroke) / neuromuscular / orthopaedic problems or pain that may interfere with interpretation of results;
2. major cognitive deficits (a score \<20 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Nasreddine et al. 2005);
3. history of psychiatric disorders, alcohol or drug abuse, skin sensitivity, seizures, migraines, metal in cranium and other implants (cochlear, cardiac);
4. taking medications (e.g. epileptic and psychoactive drugs) that could affect brain activity (Poreisz 2007).

Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No