Paired Associative Stimulation in Post-stroke Hand Motor Deficits

NCT ID: NCT02284087

Last Updated: 2025-12-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

81 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-01-26

Study Completion Date

2018-11-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Introduction The motor impairment of the upper extremity is the most common sequelae after ischemic stroke. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a promising non- invasive technique in the rehabilitation of motor deficits. However, its effect in post-stroke motor deficits remains moderate our days. To potentiate the effect of TMS, techniques called Paired Associative Stimulations (PAS) involving the integration of afferent sensory inputs at the level of the ipsilesional primary motor cortex were developed in healthy subjects. PAS techniques have shown a gain of corticospinal excitability by such phenomenon known as long Term Potentiation (LTP) and a gain of motor performance. The investigators would like to propose to evaluate two types of these techniques with a volley of visual afferents (visuomotor stimulation, V\_PAS) or of cerebellar afferents (CER\_PAS), because these two structures convey important information in the execution of the movement.

Design Multicenter, randomized, study, 60 patients in 3 parallel groups (V\_PAS, CER\_PAS, control group with sham and sham V\_PAS CER\_PAS), 5 days of treatment, clinical assessment, electrophysiological and MRI before, immediately post- and second post-assessments (4 weeks).

A group of 24 healthy subjects will undergo a parallel physiopathological study on the underlying mechanisms of cerebellar PAS

Objectives Main objective: To determine whether (and how) Paired Associative Stimulation technique (PAS) induces cerebral reorganization in the primary motor cortex compared to the control group.

Aim 2: Determine whether (and which) type of PAS is capable of inducing changes in motor performance of the upper limb paresis and duration Aim 3: Determine whether (and which) type of PAS is capable of inducing changes in excitability of the corticospinal tract and duration Aim 4: Determine how PAS techniques modify the functional connectivity during movement Aim 5: Determine if connectivity changes during induced movement correlate with clinical improvements Aim 6: Determine whether patients who benefit of a type of PAS have specific anatomical lesion characteristics (volume, afferent and efferent white matter fasciculi integrity)

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Introduction The motor impairment of the upper extremity is the most common sequelae after ischemic stroke. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a promising non- invasive technique in the rehabilitation of motor deficits. However, its effect in post-stroke motor deficits remains moderate the investigators days. To potentiate the effect of TMS, techniques called Paired Associative Stimulations (PAS) involving the integration of afferent sensory inputs at the level of the ipsilesional primary motor cortex were developed in healthy subjects. PAS techniques have shown a gain of corticospinal excitability by such phenomenon known as long Term Potentiation (LTP) and a gain of motor performance. The investigators would like to propose to evaluate two types of these techniques with a volley of visual afferents (visuomotor stimulation, V\_PAS) or of cerebellar afferents (CER\_PAS), because these two structures convey important information in the execution of the movement.

Design Multicenter, randomized study, 60 patients in 3 parallel groups (V\_PAS, CER\_PAS, control group with sham and sham V\_PAS CER\_PAS), 5 days of treatment, clinical assessment, electrophysiological and MRI before, immediately post- and second post-assessments (4 weeks).

A group of 24 healthy subjects will undergo a parallel physiopathological study on the underlying mechanisms of cerebellar PAS Objectives Main objective: To determine whether (and how) Paired Associative Stimulation technique (PAS) induces cerebral reorganization in the primary motor cortex compared to the control group.

Aim 2: Determine whether (and which) type of PAS is capable of inducing changes in motor performance of the upper limb paresis and duration Aim 3: Determine whether (and which) type of PAS is capable of inducing changes in excitability of the corticospinal tract and duration Aim 4: Determine how PAS techniques modify the functional connectivity during movement Aim 5: Determine if connectivity changes during induced movement correlate with clinical improvements Aim 6: Determine whether patients who benefit of a type of PAS have specific anatomical lesion characteristics (volume, afferent and efferent white matter fasciculi integrity) Aim 7: for healthy subjects: determine the TMS parameters that will influence the response to cerebellar PAS protocols

Hypotheses

* The sensorimotor stimulation approach (V\_PAS or CER\_PAS) improves motor function of the hand compared to the control group. The CER\_PAS approach may be more effective than V\_PAS as the cerebellum plays a major role in the post-stroke recovery
* This improvement would be explained by an effect on brain reorganization by increasing the proportion of activation in the ipsilesional primary motor cortex comparing to the contralesional side, as well as strengthening the relationships between ipsilesional premotor and motor cortices.
* Clinical and electrophysiological effects observed in the combined approach are correlated with specific characteristics of the sensorimotor network assessed by MRI.

Perspectives Demonstrating beneficial effects would subsequently consider protocols in order to achieve a therapeutic effect in the long term. The low cost greatly facilitates the implementation of feasible treatments in routine care in specialized centers (or pilot research centers) and potentially useful in many patients. The study of the characteristics of responders and non-responders patients would provide "patient-oriented" treatment, which take into account the particularities of each subject.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke and Healthy Subjects

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

V_PAS

Visuomotor paired associative stimulation protocol

PAS

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham V_PAS

Placebo group of Visuomotor paired associative stimulation protocol

No interventions assigned to this group

CER_PAS

cerebellar-motor associative stimulation protocol

PAS

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham CER_PAS

Placebo group of cerebellar-motor associative stimulation protocol

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PAS

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* First event ischemic stroke with hand motor deficit
* Time since stroke \> 30 days
* Stroke lesion sparing the primary motor cortex (hand knob area)
* Age between 18 and 85 ans


* Age between 18 and 85
* Right handed

Exclusion Criteria

* No homonymous hemianopia
* No contra-indications for TMS and MRI
* Pregnancy
* Epilepsia
* Any pathology that threatened the 1 month follow up


* No contra-indications for TMS and MRI
* Pregnancy
* Any cerebral pathology or pathology that threatened the 1 month follow up
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Charlotte ROSSO, PI

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Brain and Spine institute, INSERM UMR 1127, CNRS 7225

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

ICM, CIC Neurosciences

Paris, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kemlin C, Moulton E, Leder S, Houot M, Meunier S, Rosso C, Lamy JC. Redundancy Among Parameters Describing the Input-Output Relation of Motor Evoked Potentials in Healthy Subjects and Stroke Patients. Front Neurol. 2019 May 21;10:535. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00535. eCollection 2019.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31178817 (View on PubMed)

Rosso C, Moulton EJ, Kemlin C, Leder S, Corvol JC, Mehdi S, Obadia MA, Obadia M, Yger M, Meseguer E, Perlbarg V, Valabregue R, Magno S, Lindberg P, Meunier S, Lamy JC. Cerebello-Motor Paired Associative Stimulation and Motor Recovery in Stroke: a Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind Pilot Trial. Neurotherapeutics. 2022 Mar;19(2):491-500. doi: 10.1007/s13311-022-01205-y. Epub 2022 Feb 28.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 35226342 (View on PubMed)

Rosso C, Perlbarg V, Valabregue R, Obadia M, Kemlin-Mechin C, Moulton E, Leder S, Meunier S, Lamy JC. Anatomical and functional correlates of cortical motor threshold of the dominant hand. Brain Stimul. 2017 Sep-Oct;10(5):952-958. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 17.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28551318 (View on PubMed)

Rosso C, Lamy JC. Does Resting Motor Threshold Predict Motor Hand Recovery After Stroke? Front Neurol. 2018 Nov 29;9:1020. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.01020. eCollection 2018.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30555404 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2014-A01165-42

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

C14-38

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

BCI Post-stroke Neurorehabilitation
NCT02404857 COMPLETED NA