Paired Associative Stimulation in Post-stroke Hand Motor Deficits
NCT ID: NCT02284087
Last Updated: 2025-12-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
81 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-01-26
2018-11-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Design Multicenter, randomized, study, 60 patients in 3 parallel groups (V\_PAS, CER\_PAS, control group with sham and sham V\_PAS CER\_PAS), 5 days of treatment, clinical assessment, electrophysiological and MRI before, immediately post- and second post-assessments (4 weeks).
A group of 24 healthy subjects will undergo a parallel physiopathological study on the underlying mechanisms of cerebellar PAS
Objectives Main objective: To determine whether (and how) Paired Associative Stimulation technique (PAS) induces cerebral reorganization in the primary motor cortex compared to the control group.
Aim 2: Determine whether (and which) type of PAS is capable of inducing changes in motor performance of the upper limb paresis and duration Aim 3: Determine whether (and which) type of PAS is capable of inducing changes in excitability of the corticospinal tract and duration Aim 4: Determine how PAS techniques modify the functional connectivity during movement Aim 5: Determine if connectivity changes during induced movement correlate with clinical improvements Aim 6: Determine whether patients who benefit of a type of PAS have specific anatomical lesion characteristics (volume, afferent and efferent white matter fasciculi integrity)
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Combination of Motor Imagery Exercises and Brain Stimulation TMS Type PAS in Patients After Hemiplegic Stroke
NCT02779218
Efficacy of Personalized Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol Based on Functional Reserve to Enhance Upper Limb Function in Subacute Stroke Patients
NCT06270238
tDCS on Motor Rehabiliation of Post Stroke Patients
NCT03446378
Finding an Optimal Latency for Paired Associative Stimulation in People With Chronic Stroke
NCT02188420
The Impact of Neuronavigation in rTMS for Hemiplegic Stroke Patients.
NCT07284017
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Design Multicenter, randomized study, 60 patients in 3 parallel groups (V\_PAS, CER\_PAS, control group with sham and sham V\_PAS CER\_PAS), 5 days of treatment, clinical assessment, electrophysiological and MRI before, immediately post- and second post-assessments (4 weeks).
A group of 24 healthy subjects will undergo a parallel physiopathological study on the underlying mechanisms of cerebellar PAS Objectives Main objective: To determine whether (and how) Paired Associative Stimulation technique (PAS) induces cerebral reorganization in the primary motor cortex compared to the control group.
Aim 2: Determine whether (and which) type of PAS is capable of inducing changes in motor performance of the upper limb paresis and duration Aim 3: Determine whether (and which) type of PAS is capable of inducing changes in excitability of the corticospinal tract and duration Aim 4: Determine how PAS techniques modify the functional connectivity during movement Aim 5: Determine if connectivity changes during induced movement correlate with clinical improvements Aim 6: Determine whether patients who benefit of a type of PAS have specific anatomical lesion characteristics (volume, afferent and efferent white matter fasciculi integrity) Aim 7: for healthy subjects: determine the TMS parameters that will influence the response to cerebellar PAS protocols
Hypotheses
* The sensorimotor stimulation approach (V\_PAS or CER\_PAS) improves motor function of the hand compared to the control group. The CER\_PAS approach may be more effective than V\_PAS as the cerebellum plays a major role in the post-stroke recovery
* This improvement would be explained by an effect on brain reorganization by increasing the proportion of activation in the ipsilesional primary motor cortex comparing to the contralesional side, as well as strengthening the relationships between ipsilesional premotor and motor cortices.
* Clinical and electrophysiological effects observed in the combined approach are correlated with specific characteristics of the sensorimotor network assessed by MRI.
Perspectives Demonstrating beneficial effects would subsequently consider protocols in order to achieve a therapeutic effect in the long term. The low cost greatly facilitates the implementation of feasible treatments in routine care in specialized centers (or pilot research centers) and potentially useful in many patients. The study of the characteristics of responders and non-responders patients would provide "patient-oriented" treatment, which take into account the particularities of each subject.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
V_PAS
Visuomotor paired associative stimulation protocol
PAS
Sham V_PAS
Placebo group of Visuomotor paired associative stimulation protocol
No interventions assigned to this group
CER_PAS
cerebellar-motor associative stimulation protocol
PAS
Sham CER_PAS
Placebo group of cerebellar-motor associative stimulation protocol
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PAS
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Time since stroke \> 30 days
* Stroke lesion sparing the primary motor cortex (hand knob area)
* Age between 18 and 85 ans
* Age between 18 and 85
* Right handed
Exclusion Criteria
* No contra-indications for TMS and MRI
* Pregnancy
* Epilepsia
* Any pathology that threatened the 1 month follow up
* No contra-indications for TMS and MRI
* Pregnancy
* Any cerebral pathology or pathology that threatened the 1 month follow up
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Charlotte ROSSO, PI
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Brain and Spine institute, INSERM UMR 1127, CNRS 7225
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
ICM, CIC Neurosciences
Paris, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kemlin C, Moulton E, Leder S, Houot M, Meunier S, Rosso C, Lamy JC. Redundancy Among Parameters Describing the Input-Output Relation of Motor Evoked Potentials in Healthy Subjects and Stroke Patients. Front Neurol. 2019 May 21;10:535. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00535. eCollection 2019.
Rosso C, Moulton EJ, Kemlin C, Leder S, Corvol JC, Mehdi S, Obadia MA, Obadia M, Yger M, Meseguer E, Perlbarg V, Valabregue R, Magno S, Lindberg P, Meunier S, Lamy JC. Cerebello-Motor Paired Associative Stimulation and Motor Recovery in Stroke: a Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind Pilot Trial. Neurotherapeutics. 2022 Mar;19(2):491-500. doi: 10.1007/s13311-022-01205-y. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
Rosso C, Perlbarg V, Valabregue R, Obadia M, Kemlin-Mechin C, Moulton E, Leder S, Meunier S, Lamy JC. Anatomical and functional correlates of cortical motor threshold of the dominant hand. Brain Stimul. 2017 Sep-Oct;10(5):952-958. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 17.
Rosso C, Lamy JC. Does Resting Motor Threshold Predict Motor Hand Recovery After Stroke? Front Neurol. 2018 Nov 29;9:1020. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.01020. eCollection 2018.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2014-A01165-42
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
C14-38
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.