Robotic Therapy and Brain Stimulation in the Early Phase After Stroke

NCT ID: NCT03230695

Last Updated: 2022-10-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-08-03

Study Completion Date

2025-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Stroke is the second cause of death worldwide and the majority of the survivors remain with motor impairments. Inhibition of the motor cortex of the unaffected hemisphere has emerged as a potential intervention to enhance effects of other rehabilitation strategies on improvement of motor performance of the paretic upper limb. In this proof-of-concept study we will evaluate the effects of inhibition of the motor cortex of the unaffected hemisphere associated with robotic therapy on improvement of motor performance of the paretic upper limb in the early phase post-stroke.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The main goal of this study is to test the proof of concept of benefits of inhibition of the motor cortex of the unaffected hemisphere on learning evaluated by improvement in kinematics of motor performance, in patients with upper limb paresis in the early phase post-stroke. For this purpose, patients will be randomized to receive real or sham transcranial direct current stimulation before a session of robotic therapy. Data will be collected by kinematic assessment performed automatically by the robot at baseline, immediately after and 24h after the intervention.

The working hypothesis is that one session of upper limb motor training will lead to improvement of performance in metrics of kinematics, and this improvement will be maintained up to 24h after the end of the training.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Active stimulation + robotic therapy

Active transcranial direct current stimulation will be applied during 20 minutes prior to robotic training.

Number of interventions sessions: 1

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Robotic Therapy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Robotic therapy (MIT - Manus, Interactive Motion Technologies) will be administered for 40 minutes to the paretic upper limb.

Active stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Active transcranial direct current stimulation will be applied with the cathode positioned over the ipsilesional primary motor cortex and the anode over the contralateral supraorbital region for 20 minutes (1mA).

Sham stimulation + robotic therapy

Sham transcranial direct current stimulation will be applied during 20 minutes prior to robotic training.

Number of interventions sessions: 1

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Robotic Therapy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Robotic therapy (MIT - Manus, Interactive Motion Technologies) will be administered for 40 minutes to the paretic upper limb.

Sham stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

In sham transcranial direct current stimulation, no current will be delivered through the transcranial direct current stimulation device after the first 30 seconds.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Robotic Therapy

Robotic therapy (MIT - Manus, Interactive Motion Technologies) will be administered for 40 minutes to the paretic upper limb.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Active stimulation

Active transcranial direct current stimulation will be applied with the cathode positioned over the ipsilesional primary motor cortex and the anode over the contralateral supraorbital region for 20 minutes (1mA).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham stimulation

In sham transcranial direct current stimulation, no current will be delivered through the transcranial direct current stimulation device after the first 30 seconds.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke onset from 3 days to 9 weeks before, confirmed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.

Motor impairment of an upper limb, defined as a score between 1 - 3 in the Medical Research Council Scale, for at lest one the following movements: elbow extension, shoulder flexion, or shoulder extension.

Ability to provide written informed consent.

Ability to comply with the schedule of interventions and evaluations in the protocol.

Exclusion Criteria

Severe spasticity at the paretic elbow, wrist or fingers, defined as a score of \> 3 in the Modified Ashworth Spasticity Scale.

No active shoulder and elbow movements

Uncontrolled medical problems such as end-stage cancer or renal disease

Pregnancy

Potential contraindications to transcranial direct current stimulation: history of seizures, lesions on the scalp, intracranial metal implants, prior intracranial surgery, use of drugs that interfere on cortical excitability (such as antiepileptic drugs, benzodiazepines)

Other neurological disorders such as Parkinson's disease

Psychiatric illness

Aphasia or severe cognitive deficits that compromise comprehension of the experimental protocol or ability to provide consent.

Hemineglect

Cerebellar lesions or on cerebellar pathways

Contact precautions
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Adriana B Conforto, D, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Sao Paulo

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Suzana Bleckmann Reis

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RCT2129001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.