Robotic Therapy and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients With Stroke
NCT ID: NCT02416791
Last Updated: 2020-10-20
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
9 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-06-30
2016-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Robotic Therapy and Brain Stimulation in the Early Phase After Stroke
NCT03230695
Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Subacute Phase After Stroke
NCT02455427
Robots Paired With tDCS in Stroke Recovery
NCT01726673
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Robotic Therapy in Upper Limb Motor Recovery After Stroke
NCT02496026
Combined Brain and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Stroke
NCT01907737
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Data about eventual adverse effect will be collected in each session of treatment. The working hypothesis is that robotic therapy associated with active tDCS and conventional therapy will be as safe as robotic therapy associated with conventional therapy, and as conventional therapy alone.
We will aso preliminarily evaluate the efficacy of robotic therapy associated with active tDCS and conventional therapy, compared to robotic therapy associated with sham tDCS and to conventional therapy alone, in improvement of upper limb motor impairment.
Our secondary goals are: 1) To evaluate safety and upper limb motor impairments in patients submitted to each of the three interventions, 6 months after end of treatment; 2) To compare effects of the abovementioned interventions on disability, spasticity and quality of life, in patients at an early stage after stroke, immediately after treatment and 6 months later.
The working hypothesis is that the association of robotic therapy, tDCS and conventional therapy will lead to better outcomes than robotic therapy and conventional therapy, or conventional therapy alone.
Patients will be assessed before the first session and after the last session of treatment, as well as 6 months after the last session of treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Active tDCS + robotic therapy + physical therapy
Active tDCS (transcranial direct current stimulation) will be applied prior to the robotic training. After robot training, the patient will receive physical therapy for 40 minutes.
Number of treatment sessions: 18 (3 times a week, for 6 weeks).
Robotic Therapy
Robotic therapy (MIT - Manus, Interactive Motion Technologies) will be administered for 40 minutes to the paretic upper limb.
Active tDCS
Active tDCS will be applied with the cathode positioned over the ipsilesional primary motor cortex and the anode over the contralateral supraorbital region for 20 minutes (1mA).
Physical Therapy
Physical therapy will be administered for 40 minutes.
sham tDCS + robotic therapy + physical therapy
Sham tDCS (transcranial direct current stimulation) will be applied prior to robotic training. After robot training, the patient will receive physical therapy for 40 minutes.
Number of treatment sessions: 18 (3 times a week, for 6 weeks).
Robotic Therapy
Robotic therapy (MIT - Manus, Interactive Motion Technologies) will be administered for 40 minutes to the paretic upper limb.
Sham tDCS
In sham tDCS, no current will be delivered through the tDCS device.
Physical Therapy
Physical therapy will be administered for 40 minutes.
sham tDCS + physical therapy + occupational therapy
Sham tDCS (transcranial direct current stimulation) will be applied prior to conventional therapy (40 minutes of physical therapy and 40 minutes of occupational therapy) Number of treatment sessions: 18 (3 times a week, for 6 weeks).
Sham tDCS
In sham tDCS, no current will be delivered through the tDCS device.
Physical Therapy
Physical therapy will be administered for 40 minutes.
Occupational Therapy
Occupational therapy will be administered for 40 minutes.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Robotic Therapy
Robotic therapy (MIT - Manus, Interactive Motion Technologies) will be administered for 40 minutes to the paretic upper limb.
Active tDCS
Active tDCS will be applied with the cathode positioned over the ipsilesional primary motor cortex and the anode over the contralateral supraorbital region for 20 minutes (1mA).
Sham tDCS
In sham tDCS, no current will be delivered through the tDCS device.
Physical Therapy
Physical therapy will be administered for 40 minutes.
Occupational Therapy
Occupational therapy will be administered for 40 minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Moderate to severe motor impairment of an upper limb, defined as a score between 7 - 42 on the Upper Limb Subscale of Fugl Meyer Assessment of Sensorimotor Recovery after stroke.
* Ability to provide written informed consent (patient ou legal representative)
* Ability to comply with the schedule of interventions and evaluations in the protocol.
Exclusion Criteria
* Upper limb plegia
* Uncontrolled medical problems such as end-stage cancer or renal disease
* Pregnancy
* Seizures, except for a single seizure during the first week post stroke
* Pacemakers
* Other neurological disorders such as Parkinson's disease
* Psychiatric illness including severe depression
* Aphasia ou severe cognitive deficits that compromise comprehension of the experimental protocol or ability to provide consent.
* Hemineglect
* Drugs that interfere on cortical excitability, except for antidepressants
* Cerebellar lesions
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
OTHER_GOV
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Adriana B Conforto, MD Phd
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Sao Paulo
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital das Clínicas
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Elsner B, Kugler J, Pohl M, Mehrholz J. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning, in people after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 11;11(11):CD009645. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009645.pub4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
513.207
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.