Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS) and Robotic Training to Improve Arm Function After Stroke
NCT ID: NCT03592745
Last Updated: 2021-06-29
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
36 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-08-09
2021-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Trans Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS) and Robotic Training for Paralyzed Arm After Stroke
NCT05339893
Robots Paired With tDCS in Stroke Recovery
NCT01726673
Combining Non-Invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation and Robotic Training in Upper Limb-Impaired Chronic Stroke Patients
NCT02878720
Brain and Coordination Changes Induced By Robotics and FES Treatment Following Stroke
NCT00237744
Effects of Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Robot and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Subacute Stroke
NCT04054102
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
active tVNS + robotic arm therapy
Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS) will be delivered non-invasively via the ear (targeting the auricular branch of the vagus nerve) during robotic arm therapy sessions lasting \~60 minutes, 3x per week for 3 weeks.
Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS)
tVNS is a non-invasive form of vagus nerve stimulation, activating the auricular branch of the vagus nerve transcutaneously through the cymba concha at the pinna of the ear.
sham tVNS + robotic arm therapy
Sham (placebo) transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS) will be delivered non-invasively via the ear (targeting the auricular branch of the vagus nerve) during robotic arm therapy sessions lasting \~60 minutes, 3x per week for 3 weeks.
Sham Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS)
tVNS is a non-invasive form of vagus nerve stimulation, activating the auricular branch of the vagus nerve transcutaneously through the cymba concha at the pinna of the ear. Sham tVNS means the patient is wearing the device, but it is turned off and not delivering current during the treatment. This is a placebo condition, which is used as a study control.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS)
tVNS is a non-invasive form of vagus nerve stimulation, activating the auricular branch of the vagus nerve transcutaneously through the cymba concha at the pinna of the ear.
Sham Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS)
tVNS is a non-invasive form of vagus nerve stimulation, activating the auricular branch of the vagus nerve transcutaneously through the cymba concha at the pinna of the ear. Sham tVNS means the patient is wearing the device, but it is turned off and not delivering current during the treatment. This is a placebo condition, which is used as a study control.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* First single focal unilateral supratentorial ischemic stroke with diagnosis verified by brain imaging (MRI or CT scans) that occurred at least 6 months prior
* Cognitive function sufficient to understand the experiments and follow instructions (per interview with Speech Pathologist or PI)
* Fugl-Meyer assessment 12 to 44 out of 66 (neither hemiplegic nor fully recovered motor function in the muscles of the shoulder, elbow, and wrist).
Exclusion Criteria
* Fixed contraction deformity in the affected limb
* Complete and total flaccid paralysis of all shoulder and elbow motor performance
* Prior injury to the vagus nerve
* Severe dysphagia
* Introduction of any new rehabilitation interventions during study
* Individuals with scar tissue, broken skin, or irremovable metal piercings that may interfere with the stimulation or the stimulation device
* Highly conductive metal in any part of the body, including metal injury to the eye; this will be reviewed on a case by case basis for PI to make a determination
* Pregnant or plan on becoming pregnant or breastfeeding during the study period
* Significant arrhythmias, including but not limited to, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, sick sinus syndrome, and A-V blocks (enrollment to be determined by PI review)
* Presence of an electrically, magnetically or mechanically activated implant (including cardiac pacemaker), an intracerebral vascular clip, or any other electrically sensitive support system; Loop recorders will be reviewed on a case by case basis by PI and the treating Cardiologist to make a determination
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Northwell Health
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Bruce Volpe
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Feinstein Institute for Medical Research
Manhasset, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Dawson J, Pierce D, Dixit A, Kimberley TJ, Robertson M, Tarver B, Hilmi O, McLean J, Forbes K, Kilgard MP, Rennaker RL, Cramer SC, Walters M, Engineer N. Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Upper-Limb Rehabilitation After Ischemic Stroke. Stroke. 2016 Jan;47(1):143-50. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010477. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
Capone F, Miccinilli S, Pellegrino G, Zollo L, Simonetti D, Bressi F, Florio L, Ranieri F, Falato E, Di Santo A, Pepe A, Guglielmelli E, Sterzi S, Di Lazzaro V. Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Combined with Robotic Rehabilitation Improves Upper Limb Function after Stroke. Neural Plast. 2017;2017:7876507. doi: 10.1155/2017/7876507. Epub 2017 Dec 10.
Khodaparast N, Hays SA, Sloan AM, Fayyaz T, Hulsey DR, Rennaker RL 2nd, Kilgard MP. Vagus nerve stimulation delivered during motor rehabilitation improves recovery in a rat model of stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 Sep;28(7):698-706. doi: 10.1177/1545968314521006. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
Khodaparast N, Hays SA, Sloan AM, Hulsey DR, Ruiz A, Pantoja M, Rennaker RL 2nd, Kilgard MP. Vagus nerve stimulation during rehabilitative training improves forelimb strength following ischemic stroke. Neurobiol Dis. 2013 Dec;60:80-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2013.08.002. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
Hays SA. Enhancing Rehabilitative Therapies with Vagus Nerve Stimulation. Neurotherapeutics. 2016 Apr;13(2):382-94. doi: 10.1007/s13311-015-0417-z.
Volpe BT, Huerta PT, Zipse JL, Rykman A, Edwards D, Dipietro L, Hogan N, Krebs HI. Robotic devices as therapeutic and diagnostic tools for stroke recovery. Arch Neurol. 2009 Sep;66(9):1086-90. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2009.182.
Chang JL, Coggins AN, Saul M, Paget-Blanc A, Straka M, Wright J, Datta-Chaudhuri T, Zanos S, Volpe BT. Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tAVNS) Delivered During Upper Limb Interactive Robotic Training Demonstrates Novel Antagonist Control for Reaching Movements Following Stroke. Front Neurosci. 2021 Nov 25;15:767302. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.767302. eCollection 2021.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
18-0404
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.