A Novel Approach for Brain Stimulation in Severe Stroke
NCT ID: NCT03868410
Last Updated: 2025-06-05
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
EARLY_PHASE1
16 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-04-01
2023-07-13
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study will utilize a novel method of non-invasive brain stimulation in conjunction with upper limb training given for 12 visits over a period of 6 weeks.
The study will include the following site visits:
* Eligibility Screening and Informed Consent Visit
* An MRI visit
* Two testing visits in which motor function of the upper limb and neurophysiology will be measured
* 12 intervention visits during which patients will receive upper limb training in conjunction with non-invasive brain stimulation
* Repeat testing of motor function of the upper limb and neurophysiology
* Repeat MRI testing
* A follow-up visit completed 3 months after the completion of interventions
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Novel Brain Stimulation for Bimanual Motor Function and Control in Chronic Stroke
NCT05381740
Improving Rehabilitation by Magnetic Brain Stimulation
NCT00636701
Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS) and Robotic Training to Improve Arm Function After Stroke
NCT03592745
Mechanisms of Arm Recovery in Stroke Patients With Hand Paralysis
NCT03067818
Brain Stimulation-aided Stroke Rehabilitation: Neural Mechanisms of Recovery
NCT01539096
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Contralesional dorsal premotor cortex (cPMD) rTMS + Training
New Approach
New Repetitive Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Approach
Participants in this arm will receive rTMS-based facilitation of the contralesional dorsal premotor cortex (cPMd) located in the non-stroke hemisphere before start of each session. High-frequency rTMS (5-Hz) will be delivered using 42 10-sec trains of 50 pulses each (total 2100 pulses) for a period of 24 minutes. Immediately after the completion of rTMS, participants will undergo upper limb training for a total of one hour. Participants will receive these interventions 2 days a week for 6 weeks, i.e., for a total of 12 sessions.
Ipsilesional Primary Motor Cortex (iM1) rTMS + Training
Conventional Approach
Conventional Repetitive Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Approach
Participants in this arm will receive rTMS-based facilitation of the ipsilesional primary motor cortex (iM1) before the start of each session. iM1 will be stimulated with high-frequency rTMS (5-Hz) using 42 10-sec trains of 50 pulses each (total 2100 pulses) for a period of 24 minutes. Immediately after the completion of rTMS, participants will undergo upper limb training for a total of one hour. Participants will receive these interventions 2 days a week for 6 weeks, i.e., for a total of 12 sessions.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
New Repetitive Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Approach
Participants in this arm will receive rTMS-based facilitation of the contralesional dorsal premotor cortex (cPMd) located in the non-stroke hemisphere before start of each session. High-frequency rTMS (5-Hz) will be delivered using 42 10-sec trains of 50 pulses each (total 2100 pulses) for a period of 24 minutes. Immediately after the completion of rTMS, participants will undergo upper limb training for a total of one hour. Participants will receive these interventions 2 days a week for 6 weeks, i.e., for a total of 12 sessions.
Conventional Repetitive Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Approach
Participants in this arm will receive rTMS-based facilitation of the ipsilesional primary motor cortex (iM1) before the start of each session. iM1 will be stimulated with high-frequency rTMS (5-Hz) using 42 10-sec trains of 50 pulses each (total 2100 pulses) for a period of 24 minutes. Immediately after the completion of rTMS, participants will undergo upper limb training for a total of one hour. Participants will receive these interventions 2 days a week for 6 weeks, i.e., for a total of 12 sessions.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* moderate or severely impaired (UEFM ≤42)
* have either extensive damage to ipsilesional pathways (MEP-), or, have one of the following: less than 10 degrees active wrist extension, less than 10 degrees active thumb extension/abduction, less than 10 degrees active extension in at least 2 additional digits (i.e. will not meet minimum Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy \[CIMT\] criteria).
* medically stable
Exclusion Criteria
* brainstem stroke
* bilateral strokes affecting sensorimotor structures
* severe cognitive impairment
* substantially elevated tone/spasticity in wrist/hand (Modified Ashworth Scale \>3)
* severe contracture
* participation in outpatient or Botox therapy within 2 months
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
American Heart Association
OTHER
The Cleveland Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ela B. Plow
Assistant Staff
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ela Plow, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Lerner Research Institute; Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Lerner Research Institute; Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cunningham DA, Varnerin N, Machado A, Bonnett C, Janini D, Roelle S, Potter-Baker K, Sankarasubramanian V, Wang X, Yue G, Plow EB. Stimulation targeting higher motor areas in stroke rehabilitation: A proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled study of effectiveness and underlying mechanisms. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2015;33(6):911-26. doi: 10.3233/RNN-150574.
Potter-Baker KA, Lin YL, Machado AG, Conforto AB, Cunningham DA, Sankarasubramanian V, Sakaie K, Plow EB. Variability of motor evoked potentials in stroke explained by corticospinal pathway integrity. Brain Stimul. 2018 Jul-Aug;11(4):929-931. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Mar 9. No abstract available.
Plow EB, Cunningham DA, Varnerin N, Machado A. Rethinking stimulation of the brain in stroke rehabilitation: why higher motor areas might be better alternatives for patients with greater impairments. Neuroscientist. 2015 Jun;21(3):225-40. doi: 10.1177/1073858414537381. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
Sankarasubramanian V, Machado AG, Conforto AB, Potter-Baker KA, Cunningham DA, Varnerin NM, Wang X, Sakaie K, Plow EB. Inhibition versus facilitation of contralesional motor cortices in stroke: Deriving a model to tailor brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Jun;128(6):892-902. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.03.030. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
Li X, Lin YL, Cunningham DA, Wolf SL, Sakaie K, Conforto AB, Machado AG, Mohan A, O'Laughlin K, Wang X, Widina M, Plow EB. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Contralesional Dorsal Premotor Cortex for Upper Extremity Motor Improvement in Severe Stroke: Study Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022;51(5):557-564. doi: 10.1159/000521514. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
18-861
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.