A Novel Approach for Brain Stimulation in Severe Stroke

NCT ID: NCT03868410

Last Updated: 2025-06-05

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

EARLY_PHASE1

Total Enrollment

16 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-04-01

Study Completion Date

2023-07-13

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The long-term goal of this project is to develop upper limb rehabilitation interventions that can be utilized for stroke survivors, specifically survivors with more severe limitations in use of their affected upper limb.

This study will utilize a novel method of non-invasive brain stimulation in conjunction with upper limb training given for 12 visits over a period of 6 weeks.

The study will include the following site visits:

* Eligibility Screening and Informed Consent Visit
* An MRI visit
* Two testing visits in which motor function of the upper limb and neurophysiology will be measured
* 12 intervention visits during which patients will receive upper limb training in conjunction with non-invasive brain stimulation
* Repeat testing of motor function of the upper limb and neurophysiology
* Repeat MRI testing
* A follow-up visit completed 3 months after the completion of interventions

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In a pilot, randomized clinical trial, 24 stroke patients with moderate/severe impairments will receive non-invasive brain stimulation (repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation or rTMS) to one of two targets in the brain in conjunction with upper limb training for 2 days a week for 6 weeks. The primary outcome will be upper limb motor impairment, and secondary outcomes will be tests of functional abilities, proximal motor control, and patient-reported disability. Associated neural mechanisms will also be studied using neurophysiological and functional connectivity MRI techniques. Damage to ipsilesional corticospinal pathways will be indexed with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

In a pilot, randomized, assessor-blind clinical trial, an anticipated 24 patients will be assigned to either receive stimulation to a new brain target- contralesional dorsal premotor cortex (cPMd) located in the non-stroke hemisphere- or the conventional brain target- ipsilesional primary motor cortex (iM1) located in the stroke hemisphere. Stimulation will be delivered in conjunction with rehabilitation for 2 days a week for 6 weeks.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Subjects will be told they will receive brain stimulation, but will be given no indication as to which target will be stimulated. Investigators analyzing functional outcome data, neurophysiology data and MRI data will receive coded data that conceals the identity of the subject.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Contralesional dorsal premotor cortex (cPMD) rTMS + Training

New Approach

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

New Repetitive Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Approach

Intervention Type DEVICE

Participants in this arm will receive rTMS-based facilitation of the contralesional dorsal premotor cortex (cPMd) located in the non-stroke hemisphere before start of each session. High-frequency rTMS (5-Hz) will be delivered using 42 10-sec trains of 50 pulses each (total 2100 pulses) for a period of 24 minutes. Immediately after the completion of rTMS, participants will undergo upper limb training for a total of one hour. Participants will receive these interventions 2 days a week for 6 weeks, i.e., for a total of 12 sessions.

Ipsilesional Primary Motor Cortex (iM1) rTMS + Training

Conventional Approach

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional Repetitive Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Approach

Intervention Type DEVICE

Participants in this arm will receive rTMS-based facilitation of the ipsilesional primary motor cortex (iM1) before the start of each session. iM1 will be stimulated with high-frequency rTMS (5-Hz) using 42 10-sec trains of 50 pulses each (total 2100 pulses) for a period of 24 minutes. Immediately after the completion of rTMS, participants will undergo upper limb training for a total of one hour. Participants will receive these interventions 2 days a week for 6 weeks, i.e., for a total of 12 sessions.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

New Repetitive Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Approach

Participants in this arm will receive rTMS-based facilitation of the contralesional dorsal premotor cortex (cPMd) located in the non-stroke hemisphere before start of each session. High-frequency rTMS (5-Hz) will be delivered using 42 10-sec trains of 50 pulses each (total 2100 pulses) for a period of 24 minutes. Immediately after the completion of rTMS, participants will undergo upper limb training for a total of one hour. Participants will receive these interventions 2 days a week for 6 weeks, i.e., for a total of 12 sessions.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional Repetitive Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Approach

Participants in this arm will receive rTMS-based facilitation of the ipsilesional primary motor cortex (iM1) before the start of each session. iM1 will be stimulated with high-frequency rTMS (5-Hz) using 42 10-sec trains of 50 pulses each (total 2100 pulses) for a period of 24 minutes. Immediately after the completion of rTMS, participants will undergo upper limb training for a total of one hour. Participants will receive these interventions 2 days a week for 6 weeks, i.e., for a total of 12 sessions.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Contralesional dorsal premotor cortex (cPMD) rTMS + Training Ipsilesional Primary Motor Cortex (iM1) rTMS + Training

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* chronic phase (≥6 months) after index stroke
* moderate or severely impaired (UEFM ≤42)
* have either extensive damage to ipsilesional pathways (MEP-), or, have one of the following: less than 10 degrees active wrist extension, less than 10 degrees active thumb extension/abduction, less than 10 degrees active extension in at least 2 additional digits (i.e. will not meet minimum Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy \[CIMT\] criteria).
* medically stable

Exclusion Criteria

* cerebellar stroke
* brainstem stroke
* bilateral strokes affecting sensorimotor structures
* severe cognitive impairment
* substantially elevated tone/spasticity in wrist/hand (Modified Ashworth Scale \>3)
* severe contracture
* participation in outpatient or Botox therapy within 2 months
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

American Heart Association

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Cleveland Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ela B. Plow

Assistant Staff

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ela Plow, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Lerner Research Institute; Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Lerner Research Institute; Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cunningham DA, Varnerin N, Machado A, Bonnett C, Janini D, Roelle S, Potter-Baker K, Sankarasubramanian V, Wang X, Yue G, Plow EB. Stimulation targeting higher motor areas in stroke rehabilitation: A proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled study of effectiveness and underlying mechanisms. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2015;33(6):911-26. doi: 10.3233/RNN-150574.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26484700 (View on PubMed)

Potter-Baker KA, Lin YL, Machado AG, Conforto AB, Cunningham DA, Sankarasubramanian V, Sakaie K, Plow EB. Variability of motor evoked potentials in stroke explained by corticospinal pathway integrity. Brain Stimul. 2018 Jul-Aug;11(4):929-931. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Mar 9. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29563050 (View on PubMed)

Plow EB, Cunningham DA, Varnerin N, Machado A. Rethinking stimulation of the brain in stroke rehabilitation: why higher motor areas might be better alternatives for patients with greater impairments. Neuroscientist. 2015 Jun;21(3):225-40. doi: 10.1177/1073858414537381. Epub 2014 Jun 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24951091 (View on PubMed)

Sankarasubramanian V, Machado AG, Conforto AB, Potter-Baker KA, Cunningham DA, Varnerin NM, Wang X, Sakaie K, Plow EB. Inhibition versus facilitation of contralesional motor cortices in stroke: Deriving a model to tailor brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Jun;128(6):892-902. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.03.030. Epub 2017 Mar 21.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28402865 (View on PubMed)

Li X, Lin YL, Cunningham DA, Wolf SL, Sakaie K, Conforto AB, Machado AG, Mohan A, O'Laughlin K, Wang X, Widina M, Plow EB. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Contralesional Dorsal Premotor Cortex for Upper Extremity Motor Improvement in Severe Stroke: Study Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022;51(5):557-564. doi: 10.1159/000521514. Epub 2022 Jan 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35051941 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

18-861

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Hand Rehabilitation Study for Stroke Patients
NCT03148106 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA