Radical Versus Conservative Surgical Treatment of Liver Hydatid Cysts

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

914 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2000-01-01

Study Completion Date

2019-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The management of liver hydatid cysts (LHC) is controversial. Surgery remains the basic treatment, and can be divided into radical and conservative approaches. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of radical and conservative surgery (CS) in the treatment of LHC and to evaluate the efficiency and safety of radical surgery (RS).

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Surgical Treatment of Liver Hydatid Cyst (SURGHIDA)

NCT05420155

Echinococcosis, Hepatic

COMPLETED

Radical Versus Conservative Surgery in Liver Cystic Echinococcosis: a Prospective Cohort Study in a High-volume Western Centre

NCT06570876

Liver; Cyst, Hydatid, Granulosus (Etiology)

COMPLETED

The Current Study Aimed to Evaluate the Therapeutic Features and Complications of Liver Hydatid Cyst in Patients Who Underwent Surgery for CE in Fars Province, Southern Iran.

NCT04363151

Patients Who Underwent Surgury for Hydatid Cyst

COMPLETED

Surgical Treatment of Hepatic Hydatidosis in Elderly Patients

NCT05113550

Cystic Echinococcosis

COMPLETED

Short Term Surgical Outcomes of Anatomical Versus Non Anatomical Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Liver Tumors

NCT06271109

Liver Neoplasms

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The management of liver hydatid cysts (LHC) is controversial. Surgery remains the basic treatment, and can be divided into radical and conservative approaches. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of radical and conservative surgery (CS) in the treatment of LHC and to evaluate the efficiency and safety of radical surgery (RS).

Data from all patients with LHC treated in Sahloul Hospital, between January 2000 and December 2019, were retrieved from a retrospective database. To minimize selection bias, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed, based on variables representing patient characteristics and operative risk factors.

RS especially total pericystectomy had fewer postoperative complications and lower recurrence rate compared to CS. RS may be the preferred procedure for LHC if the expertise is available.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hydatid Cyst

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

hydatid cyst resection

radical resection of hydatic cyst

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age over 14 years old.
* Patients presenting liver hydatid cyst .

Exclusion Criteria

* age less than 14 years old.
* Patients presenting other localization of hydtic cyst , than the liver.
* calcified cysts.
* patients with incomplete medical records.
* patients who were lost to follow up.

Minimum Eligible Age

14 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No