Radical Versus Conservative Surgery in Liver Cystic Echinococcosis: a Prospective Cohort Study in a High-volume Western Centre

NCT ID: NCT06570876

Last Updated: 2024-08-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

192 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

1996-01-01

Study Completion Date

2021-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this observational study is to compare the results in terms of morbidity and disease-free survival between groups of patients with liver cystic echinococcosis (LCE) managed with radical surgery (RS) or conservative surgery (CS), and to evaluate potential risk factors of clinically relevant biliary fistula and liver recurrence.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Main hypothesis:

1. Radical surgery (RS) in LCE has better postoperative results than conservative surgery (CS) in terms of global morbidity, specific morbidity and liver recurrence rate.

Secondary hypotheses:
2. It is possible to identify preoperative and intraoperative prognostic factors of higher morbidity and recurrence rate.
3. The location of the residual pericystic layer in CS is related to a higher incidence of liver recurrence.
4. The percentage of residual pericystic layer in CS is related to a higher incidence of postoperative biliary fistula.

Main outcome:

1. To assess the incidence of liver recurrence between the RS and the CS groups, identifying potential risk factors.
2. To evaluate the incidence of postoperative biliary fistula between the RS and the CS groups, identifying possible risk factors.

Secondary outcomes:

1. To estimate the incidence of overall morbidity related to surgery.
2. To estimate the incidence of specific morbidity related to surgery (biliary fistula, intra-abdominal abscess, residual cavity abscess, hemoperitoneum, incisional infection, liver failure, respiratory infection, others).
3. To specifically analyze the incidence of postoperative biliary fistula and complex biliary fistula, and identify possible risk factors.
4. To estimate the incidence of mortality related to surgery.
5. To estimate the rate of hepatic and extrahepatic recurrence (number of disease-free months)
6. Prepare a recommendation for a standardized management algorithm for LCE patients based on the results obtained in the study and make it applicable to clinical practice.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Liver; Cyst, Hydatid, Granulosus (Etiology)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Radical surgery

Total cystopericystectomy and anatomical liver resections are considered RS (i.e., segmentectomy, bisegmentectomy, left lateral segmentectomy, left hepatectomy, right hepatectomy, right trisectionectomy, and liver transplantation).

Surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The decision between RS and CS depended on the patient's performance status; on the cyst's main characteristics and contact with liver structures; and on intraoperative findings.

Conservative surgery

Partial cystopericystectomy and the Lagrot technique are considered CS.

Surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The decision between RS and CS depended on the patient's performance status; on the cyst's main characteristics and contact with liver structures; and on intraoperative findings.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Surgery

The decision between RS and CS depended on the patient's performance status; on the cyst's main characteristics and contact with liver structures; and on intraoperative findings.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult population (18 years or older) of both sexes surgically intervened for a diagnosis of LCE at the Bellvitge University Hospital and during the period described using a conservative or radical technique.
* Patients with asymptomatic liver hydatid cysts of active type or transition CE1 to CE3 according to the WHO classification.
* Patients with symptomatic or complicated hepatic hydatid cysts of any type (CE1 to CE5) according to the WHO classification.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients under 18 years of age.
* Patient operated on for LCE diagnosis with inactive asymptomatic cysts (CE4 or CE5 according to the WHO classification).
* Patients with less than 1 year of follow-up.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Marina Vila Tura

Marina Vila Tura, MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Marina Vila Tura

L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

McManus DP, Zhang W, Li J, Bartley PB. Echinococcosis. Lancet. 2003 Oct 18;362(9392):1295-304. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14573-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14575976 (View on PubMed)

Gollackner B, Langle F, Auer H, Maier A, Mittlbock M, Agstner I, Karner J, Langer F, Aspock H, Loidolt H, Rockenschaub S, Steininger R. Radical surgical therapy of abdominal cystic hydatid disease: factors of recurrence. World J Surg. 2000 Jun;24(6):717-21. doi: 10.1007/s002689910115.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10773125 (View on PubMed)

Beyrouti MI, Beyrouti R, Bouassida M, Ben Amar M, Frikha F, Ben Salah K, Abid B, Guirat A, Ghorbel A, Mnif J, Ayadi A. [Hydatid cysts of the spigelian lobe (segment I) of the liver: clinical and therapeutic particularities]. Presse Med. 2007 Dec;36(12 Pt 1):1732-7. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2007.03.047. Epub 2007 Oct 31. French.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17976950 (View on PubMed)

El Malki HO, El Mejdoubi Y, Souadka A, Mohsine R, Ifrine L, Abouqal R, Belkouchi A. Predictive factors of deep abdominal complications after operation for hydatid cyst of the liver: 15 years of experience with 672 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Apr;206(4):629-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.11.012. Epub 2008 Jan 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18387467 (View on PubMed)

Wen H, Vuitton L, Tuxun T, Li J, Vuitton DA, Zhang W, McManus DP. Echinococcosis: Advances in the 21st Century. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019 Feb 13;32(2):e00075-18. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00075-18. Print 2019 Mar 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30760475 (View on PubMed)

Kratzer W, Weimer H, Schmidberger J. Echinococcosis: a Challenge for Liver Sonography. Ultraschall Med. 2022 Apr;43(2):120-145. doi: 10.1055/a-1694-5552. Epub 2022 Feb 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35211944 (View on PubMed)

Farhat W, Ammar H, Rguez A, Harrabi F, Said MA, Ghabry L, Gupta R, Ben Cheikh A, Ghali H, Ben Rajeb M, Ben Mabrouk M, Ben Ali A. Radical versus conservative surgical treatment of liver hydatid cysts: A paired comparison analysis. Am J Surg. 2022 Jul;224(1 Pt A):190-195. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.12.014. Epub 2021 Dec 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34949334 (View on PubMed)

Pang Q, Jin H, Man Z, Wang Y, Yang S, Li Z, Lu Y, Liu H, Zhou L. Radical versus conservative surgical treatment of liver hydatid cysts: a meta-analysis. Front Med. 2018 Jun;12(3):350-359. doi: 10.1007/s11684-017-0559-y. Epub 2017 Nov 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29170917 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PR048/23

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Hepatic Excision and Ablation Log
NCT06870461 NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Laparoscopic Liver Resection
NCT00553033 UNKNOWN