Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound and Molecular Analysis in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cyst
NCT ID: NCT03740360
Last Updated: 2020-02-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
36 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-06-01
2019-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Endoscopic Ultrasound Elastography in Pancreatic Masses
NCT00909103
Contrast Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasound (CEH-EUS) in Focal Pancreatic Masses
NCT01315548
Contrast Enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasound in Pancreas Lesions
NCT04324294
Long Term Follow up of Small Non-inflammatory Pancreatic Cysts
NCT01883336
Prevalence of Pancreatic Cysts During Routine Endoscopic Ultra Sound
NCT01624363
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Pancreatic cysts are a broad group of pancreatic lesions that can be divided into benign and premalignant or malignant lesions. Pseudocyst and serous cystic neoplasm (SCN) don´t have malignant potential while others like mucinous cysts are premalignant lesions. But not all mucinous neoplasms have the same risk of malignancy. According to recent publications mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN) have a potential for malignancy of around 15%, main duct intrapapillary mucinous neoplasm (MD-IPMN) of 62% and branch duct IPMN (BD-IPMN) of 25%. The correct identification of these premalignant lesions will allow to optimize the treatment and follow-up of these patients, but in many cases it is difficult to accurately differentiate between different types of cysts and their risk of malignancy. The differentiation between lmucinous and non-mucinous cysts is suboptimal, with diagnostic accuracy for CT and MRI of 61% and 50-73% with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). The endosonographic characteristics that have been related with malignancy are the size larger than 3 cm, the presence of a solid component, wall thickening, Wirsung dilation, abrupt change of the size of the main pancreatic duct with distal atrophy of the gland and the presence of lymphadenopathies. However, endosonographic characteristics are not sufficient as an individual predictor of malignancy.
The puncture of the cyst and fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) with biochemical and cytological assessment is generally indicated to differentiate between cysts and to asses for malignancy. The determination of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and amylase have low specificity for the detection of malignancy and for mucinous cyst, and the cytological assessment is highly specific but lacks of sensibility (50%). So further methods are requested for an adequate detection of premalignant and malignant cyst.
Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound uses an ultrasonographic contrast agent to visualize blood flow in fine vessels and may aid in the diagnosis of pancreatic cysts by enabling assessment of the vascularization of structures such as cyst walls, septa, or mural nodules. Furthermore it allows the correct differentiation between contrast-enhanced mural nodules, that predict for malignancy, from non-enhancing mucus clots.
The molecular analysis of cyst fluid may detect mutations that are associated with premalignant cyst and with malignancy. Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) gene has been related with mucinous cyst while von Hippel-Lindau gene (VHL) is present in serous cyst.
This study evaluates the use of contrast-enhanced EUS and the molecular analysis for pancreatic cyst diagnosis and malignant detection, and if their use may modify cyst management.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Pancreatic cyst \> 1cm with morphological diagnosis suspicious to be mucinous etiology
* Suitable for endoscopy
Exclusion Criteria
* Active anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy
* Thrombocytopenia or coagulopathy in the absence of its correction prior to the procedure
* Abscence of informed consent
* Extrapancreatic cyst
* Known pancreatic pseudocyst
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fundación de Investigación Biomédica - Hospital Universitario de La Princesa
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Universitario de la Princesa
Madrid, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FdelaMorena
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CSantander
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
PMajano
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
RHerranz
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.