Drug-Coated Balloon in Anticoagulated and Bleeding Risk Patients Undergoing PCI

NCT ID: NCT04814212

Last Updated: 2023-11-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

546 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-09-01

Study Completion Date

2028-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare DCB with DES in stable CAD or ACS patients who are at high risk of bleeding. The hypothesis of the DEBATE trial is that the strategy using DCB and a shorter DAPT regimen is non-inferior to the treatment using DES and longer DAPT duration on patients with high bleeding risk. If non-inferiority is shown, the superiority of the DCB strategy over DES strategy will be tested.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Implantation of a drug-eluting stent (DES) has become a standard of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during the last two decades. However there are still significant drawbacks in using DES as a permanent coronary implant. Most importantly, bleeding remains a significant complication of PCI, especially in elderly patients. The number of PCI patients having OAC:s is already significant, and will grow in the future, as the volume of PCIs in octogenarians increases, and so does the incidence of atrial fibrillation by age. After stenting at least one month lasting dual antiplatlet treatment (DAPT) is mandatory, and it cannot be safely terminated in case of a bleed. The optimal duration of DAPT on patients at bleeding risk is not known.

Balloon coated with paclitaxel and iopromide (drug-coated balloon, DCB) was originally developed for the treatment of in-stent restenosis, but later its potential for the treatment of de-novo coronary artery leasons has become clear in large registry trials. So far, the randomized controlled studies have shown the non-inferiority of PCI using DCB in comparison to DES in de novo leasons in small vessels. Also the non-inferiority of PCI using DCB in comparison to BMS was shown in the DEBUT trial in large vessels on patients at high bleeding risk. These results need to be confirmed in comparison of DCB to DES as the use of BMS is diminishing.

The hypothesis of the DEBATE trial is that the strategy using DCB and a shorter DAPT regimen is non-inferior to the treatment using DES and longer DAPT duration in the treatment of stable CAD or in ACS (UAP or NSTEMI) in patients on anticoagulation medication or otherwise on high bleeding risk. If non-inferiority is shown, the superiority of the DCB strategy over DES strategy will be tested.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized controlled clinical trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors
Randomization to the study groups is done using the Random generator in blocks of 20 without stratification

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Drug-coated balloon (DCB)

The coronary lesions fulfilling the inclusion criteria and randomized to the DCB group.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-coated balloon

Intervention Type DEVICE

SeQuent Please (BBraun) + tailored antithrombotic regimen:

1. Stable patients without OAC: perioperative SAPT (preferably) or perioperative DAPT followed by lifelong SAPT
2. Stable patients with OAC: perioperative SAPT (preferably) or perioperative DAPT and lifelong OAC
3. ACS patients without OAC: 1-month DAPT followed by lifelong SAPT
4. ACS patients with OAC: perioperative DAPT followed by 1-month SAPT and lifelong OAC

Drug-eluting stent (DES)

The coronary lesions fulfilling the inclusion criteria and randomized to the DES group.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-eluting stent

Intervention Type DEVICE

Biofreedom (Biosensors), Synergy (Boston Scientific), Ultimaster Tansei (Terumo) and Integrity Onyx (Medtronic), Xience Pro S (Abbott) or Promus Elite (Boston Scientific) or any other DES can also be used provided that it has a CE mark for 1-month DAPT, combined with tailored antithrombotic regimen:

1. Stable patients without OAC: 1-month DAPT followed by lifelong SAPT
2. Stable patients with OAC: perioperative DAPT followed by 6 months SAPT (ADP receptor blocker) and life-long OAC
3. ACS patients without OAC: 3-month DAPT followed by lifelong SAPT
4. ACS patients with OAC: perioperative DAPT followed by 6 months SAPT (ADP receptor blocker) and lifelong OAC

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-coated balloon

SeQuent Please (BBraun) + tailored antithrombotic regimen:

1. Stable patients without OAC: perioperative SAPT (preferably) or perioperative DAPT followed by lifelong SAPT
2. Stable patients with OAC: perioperative SAPT (preferably) or perioperative DAPT and lifelong OAC
3. ACS patients without OAC: 1-month DAPT followed by lifelong SAPT
4. ACS patients with OAC: perioperative DAPT followed by 1-month SAPT and lifelong OAC

Intervention Type DEVICE

Percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-eluting stent

Biofreedom (Biosensors), Synergy (Boston Scientific), Ultimaster Tansei (Terumo) and Integrity Onyx (Medtronic), Xience Pro S (Abbott) or Promus Elite (Boston Scientific) or any other DES can also be used provided that it has a CE mark for 1-month DAPT, combined with tailored antithrombotic regimen:

1. Stable patients without OAC: 1-month DAPT followed by lifelong SAPT
2. Stable patients with OAC: perioperative DAPT followed by 6 months SAPT (ADP receptor blocker) and life-long OAC
3. ACS patients without OAC: 3-month DAPT followed by lifelong SAPT
4. ACS patients with OAC: perioperative DAPT followed by 6 months SAPT (ADP receptor blocker) and lifelong OAC

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

DCB DES

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years
* Informed written consent
* At least one major or two minor bleeding risk criteria of Academic Research Consortium (ARC)

Major Criteria

* Long-term oral anticoagulation
* Severe or end stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) (estimated glomerular - filtration rate \[eGFR\] \<30 ml/min)
* Hemoglobin \<110 g/l
* Spontaneous bleeding requiring hospitalization and transfusion in the past 6 months
* Moderate to severe baseline thrombocytopenia (platelet count \<100 x 10e9/L)
* Chronic bleeding diathesis
* Liver cirrhosis with portal hypertension
* Active cancer in the past 12 months
* Previous spontaneous ICH (at any time)
* Previous traumatic ICH within the past 12 months
* Presence of known brain arteriovenous malformation
* Moderate to severe ischemic stroke within the past 6 months
* Nondeferrable major surgery on dual antiplatelet therapy
* Recent major surgery or trauma within 30 days before PCI

Minor Criteria

* Age \>75 years
* Moderate CKD (eGFR 30-59 ml/min)
* Hemoglobin 110-129 g/l for men and 110-119 g/l for women
* Spontaneous bleeding requiring hospitalization or transfusion within the past 12 - months not meeting major criterion
* Long term use of oral nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs or steroids
* Any ischemic stroke at any time not meeting major criterion

Either of the following:

1. Stabile angina or dyspnea and a coronary narrowing causing myocardial ischemia detected in the angiogram. In stable patients prior PCI, the evidence of ischemia is needed acquired either by perfusion imaging or by pressure wire measurement (FFR) during coronary angiography unless the coronary stenosis is \> 90% in diameter.
2. ACS (UAP or NSTEMI): symptoms of heart ischemia≥ 20 minutes and ≥ 0,5mm ST-depression or transient ST-elevation or T-wave inversion at least in two adjacent leads and/or a high sensitivity troponin (hs-tnt) rise at least one unit above the 99. percentil or at least 50% rise in hs-tnt between two samples taken 1-3 hours apart.

At least one of the following:

* ≥1 de novo lesions in native coronary arteries or bypass vein grafts
* Reference diameter of the vessel is 2.0-5.0mm'
* Lesion length ≤ 40mm
* Lesion or lesions are suitable for PCI

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability to give written consent
* STEMI
* Reference diameter of the vessel is \<2.0mm or \>5.0 mm
* Bifurcation lesion requiring the stenting of either of the branches after predilatation (TIMI\<3 or significant recoil \>30% in the main epicardial vessel: LAD, LCX or RCA) after predilatation)
* Dissection affecting the flow (TIMI\<3) or significant recoil (\>30% in the main epicardial vessel: LAD, LCX or RCA) after predilatation
* in-stent restenosis
* Chronic total occlusion
* Life expectancy \< 12 months
* Cardiogenic shock at the arrival to the coronary angiography
* Uncertainty about neurological recovery e.g. after resuscitation
* Need for bypass surgery by heart team decision
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Central Hospital of Lapland

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Kuopio University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Central Finland Hospital District

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Helsinki University Central Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Turku University Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Oulu University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Tampere University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Satakunta Central Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Päijät Häme Central Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre Hospitalier de La Rochelle

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Universitario de Cabuenes

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Saarland

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

North Karelia Central Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Tuomas Rissanen

Head of Heart Center

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tuomas T Rissanen, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

North Karelia Central Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Central Hospital of Central Finland

Jyväskylä, Central Finland, Finland

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Central Hospital of Lapland

Rovaniemi, Lapland, Finland

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Kuopio University Hospital

Kuopio, Northern Savonia, Finland

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Turku University Hospital

Turku, Southwest Finland, Finland

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Helsinki University Hospital

Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

North Karelia Central Hospital

Joensuu, , Finland

Site Status RECRUITING

Central Hospital of Päijät-Häme

Lahti, , Finland

Site Status RECRUITING

Oulu university hospital

Oulu, , Finland

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Satakunta Central Hospital

Pori, , Finland

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Tampere Heart Hospital

Tampere, , Finland

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Centre Hospitalier La Rochelle

La Rochelle, , France

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

University Hospital of Carl Gustav Carus

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

University Hospital of Saarland

Homburg, , Germany

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital Nhs Foundation Trust

Norwich, , United Kingdom

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Finland France Germany United Kingdom

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Tuomas Rissanen, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+358505998022

Alma Räsänen, MD

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Tuukka Joki, MD

Role: primary

Annika Olli, MD

Role: primary

Jussi Kärkkäinen, MD, PhD

Role: primary

Tuomas Kiviniemi, MD, PhD

Role: primary

Mikko Minkkinen, MD, PhD

Role: primary

Tuomas Rissanen, MD, PhD

Role: primary

Essi Pikkarainen, MD

Role: primary

Matti Niemelä, MD, PhD

Role: primary

Giannakis Toris, MD

Role: primary

Olli Kajander, MD, PhD

Role: primary

Ludovic Meunier, MD

Role: primary

Norman Manger, MD, PhD

Role: primary

Bruno Scheller, MD, PhD

Role: primary

Simon Eccleshall, MD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DEBATE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.