Drug-Coated Balloon in Anticoagulated and Bleeding Risk Patients Undergoing PCI
NCT ID: NCT04814212
Last Updated: 2023-11-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
546 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-09-01
2028-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Drug-Eluting Balloon in Stable and Unstable Angina
NCT01781546
Drug Eluting Balloon in Peripheral Intervention for In-Stent Restenosis
NCT01558531
Drug Eluting Balloon in peripherAl inTErvention SFA
NCT01556542
Drug-coating Balloon Angioplasties for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions
NCT04242134
Moxy Drug Coated Balloon vs. Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Arteries
NCT01412541
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Balloon coated with paclitaxel and iopromide (drug-coated balloon, DCB) was originally developed for the treatment of in-stent restenosis, but later its potential for the treatment of de-novo coronary artery leasons has become clear in large registry trials. So far, the randomized controlled studies have shown the non-inferiority of PCI using DCB in comparison to DES in de novo leasons in small vessels. Also the non-inferiority of PCI using DCB in comparison to BMS was shown in the DEBUT trial in large vessels on patients at high bleeding risk. These results need to be confirmed in comparison of DCB to DES as the use of BMS is diminishing.
The hypothesis of the DEBATE trial is that the strategy using DCB and a shorter DAPT regimen is non-inferior to the treatment using DES and longer DAPT duration in the treatment of stable CAD or in ACS (UAP or NSTEMI) in patients on anticoagulation medication or otherwise on high bleeding risk. If non-inferiority is shown, the superiority of the DCB strategy over DES strategy will be tested.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Drug-coated balloon (DCB)
The coronary lesions fulfilling the inclusion criteria and randomized to the DCB group.
Percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-coated balloon
SeQuent Please (BBraun) + tailored antithrombotic regimen:
1. Stable patients without OAC: perioperative SAPT (preferably) or perioperative DAPT followed by lifelong SAPT
2. Stable patients with OAC: perioperative SAPT (preferably) or perioperative DAPT and lifelong OAC
3. ACS patients without OAC: 1-month DAPT followed by lifelong SAPT
4. ACS patients with OAC: perioperative DAPT followed by 1-month SAPT and lifelong OAC
Drug-eluting stent (DES)
The coronary lesions fulfilling the inclusion criteria and randomized to the DES group.
Percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-eluting stent
Biofreedom (Biosensors), Synergy (Boston Scientific), Ultimaster Tansei (Terumo) and Integrity Onyx (Medtronic), Xience Pro S (Abbott) or Promus Elite (Boston Scientific) or any other DES can also be used provided that it has a CE mark for 1-month DAPT, combined with tailored antithrombotic regimen:
1. Stable patients without OAC: 1-month DAPT followed by lifelong SAPT
2. Stable patients with OAC: perioperative DAPT followed by 6 months SAPT (ADP receptor blocker) and life-long OAC
3. ACS patients without OAC: 3-month DAPT followed by lifelong SAPT
4. ACS patients with OAC: perioperative DAPT followed by 6 months SAPT (ADP receptor blocker) and lifelong OAC
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-coated balloon
SeQuent Please (BBraun) + tailored antithrombotic regimen:
1. Stable patients without OAC: perioperative SAPT (preferably) or perioperative DAPT followed by lifelong SAPT
2. Stable patients with OAC: perioperative SAPT (preferably) or perioperative DAPT and lifelong OAC
3. ACS patients without OAC: 1-month DAPT followed by lifelong SAPT
4. ACS patients with OAC: perioperative DAPT followed by 1-month SAPT and lifelong OAC
Percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-eluting stent
Biofreedom (Biosensors), Synergy (Boston Scientific), Ultimaster Tansei (Terumo) and Integrity Onyx (Medtronic), Xience Pro S (Abbott) or Promus Elite (Boston Scientific) or any other DES can also be used provided that it has a CE mark for 1-month DAPT, combined with tailored antithrombotic regimen:
1. Stable patients without OAC: 1-month DAPT followed by lifelong SAPT
2. Stable patients with OAC: perioperative DAPT followed by 6 months SAPT (ADP receptor blocker) and life-long OAC
3. ACS patients without OAC: 3-month DAPT followed by lifelong SAPT
4. ACS patients with OAC: perioperative DAPT followed by 6 months SAPT (ADP receptor blocker) and lifelong OAC
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Informed written consent
* At least one major or two minor bleeding risk criteria of Academic Research Consortium (ARC)
Major Criteria
* Long-term oral anticoagulation
* Severe or end stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) (estimated glomerular - filtration rate \[eGFR\] \<30 ml/min)
* Hemoglobin \<110 g/l
* Spontaneous bleeding requiring hospitalization and transfusion in the past 6 months
* Moderate to severe baseline thrombocytopenia (platelet count \<100 x 10e9/L)
* Chronic bleeding diathesis
* Liver cirrhosis with portal hypertension
* Active cancer in the past 12 months
* Previous spontaneous ICH (at any time)
* Previous traumatic ICH within the past 12 months
* Presence of known brain arteriovenous malformation
* Moderate to severe ischemic stroke within the past 6 months
* Nondeferrable major surgery on dual antiplatelet therapy
* Recent major surgery or trauma within 30 days before PCI
Minor Criteria
* Age \>75 years
* Moderate CKD (eGFR 30-59 ml/min)
* Hemoglobin 110-129 g/l for men and 110-119 g/l for women
* Spontaneous bleeding requiring hospitalization or transfusion within the past 12 - months not meeting major criterion
* Long term use of oral nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs or steroids
* Any ischemic stroke at any time not meeting major criterion
Either of the following:
1. Stabile angina or dyspnea and a coronary narrowing causing myocardial ischemia detected in the angiogram. In stable patients prior PCI, the evidence of ischemia is needed acquired either by perfusion imaging or by pressure wire measurement (FFR) during coronary angiography unless the coronary stenosis is \> 90% in diameter.
2. ACS (UAP or NSTEMI): symptoms of heart ischemia≥ 20 minutes and ≥ 0,5mm ST-depression or transient ST-elevation or T-wave inversion at least in two adjacent leads and/or a high sensitivity troponin (hs-tnt) rise at least one unit above the 99. percentil or at least 50% rise in hs-tnt between two samples taken 1-3 hours apart.
At least one of the following:
* ≥1 de novo lesions in native coronary arteries or bypass vein grafts
* Reference diameter of the vessel is 2.0-5.0mm'
* Lesion length ≤ 40mm
* Lesion or lesions are suitable for PCI
Exclusion Criteria
* STEMI
* Reference diameter of the vessel is \<2.0mm or \>5.0 mm
* Bifurcation lesion requiring the stenting of either of the branches after predilatation (TIMI\<3 or significant recoil \>30% in the main epicardial vessel: LAD, LCX or RCA) after predilatation)
* Dissection affecting the flow (TIMI\<3) or significant recoil (\>30% in the main epicardial vessel: LAD, LCX or RCA) after predilatation
* in-stent restenosis
* Chronic total occlusion
* Life expectancy \< 12 months
* Cardiogenic shock at the arrival to the coronary angiography
* Uncertainty about neurological recovery e.g. after resuscitation
* Need for bypass surgery by heart team decision
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Central Hospital of Lapland
UNKNOWN
Kuopio University Hospital
OTHER
Central Finland Hospital District
OTHER
Helsinki University Central Hospital
OTHER
Turku University Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Oulu University Hospital
OTHER
Tampere University Hospital
OTHER
Satakunta Central Hospital
OTHER
Päijät Häme Central Hospital
OTHER
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Centre Hospitalier de La Rochelle
OTHER
Hospital Universitario de Cabuenes
OTHER
University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus
OTHER
University Hospital, Saarland
OTHER
North Karelia Central Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Tuomas Rissanen
Head of Heart Center
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Tuomas T Rissanen, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
North Karelia Central Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Central Hospital of Central Finland
Jyväskylä, Central Finland, Finland
Central Hospital of Lapland
Rovaniemi, Lapland, Finland
Kuopio University Hospital
Kuopio, Northern Savonia, Finland
Turku University Hospital
Turku, Southwest Finland, Finland
Helsinki University Hospital
Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland
North Karelia Central Hospital
Joensuu, , Finland
Central Hospital of Päijät-Häme
Lahti, , Finland
Oulu university hospital
Oulu, , Finland
Satakunta Central Hospital
Pori, , Finland
Tampere Heart Hospital
Tampere, , Finland
Centre Hospitalier La Rochelle
La Rochelle, , France
University Hospital of Carl Gustav Carus
Dresden, , Germany
University Hospital of Saarland
Homburg, , Germany
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital Nhs Foundation Trust
Norwich, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DEBATE
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.