Effects of Barley and Oat Breads on Appetite

NCT ID: NCT04749498

Last Updated: 2021-02-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-04-01

Study Completion Date

2021-02-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aimed to compare the postprandial effects of ß-glucan derived from oats bread (OB) and barley bread (BB) on appetite and glycemia. A randomized, double-blind, crossover trial included 20 healthy individuals. All participants consumed BB, white bread (WB), and whole wheat bread (WWB) with a standard breakfast and then were served an ad libitum lunch on four different days. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess appetite before breakfast and at 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 minutes after breakfast. Blood glucose levels were measured at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 minutes. Postprandial appetite and glucose responses were quantified as the incremental area under the curve (iAUC) calculated according to the trapezoidal rule.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study aimed to compare the postprandial effects of ß-glucan on glycemia and appetite of breads derived from oats and barley, which are the best natural grain sources. In addition, the positive health effects of ß-glucan were sought to be determined independent of total dietary fiber intake, using not only WB as the control food but also WWB, which has a dietary fiber content equal to that of breads containing ß-glucan. This study was planned as a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, and crossover. Twenty healthy adults (10 men, 10 women) between the ages of 19-35 years, with normal body weight (BMI 18.5-25 kg /m2) were included in the study. Participants were selected from among Erciyes University students and staff in accordance with the inclusion criteria. The eating behaviors of all participants were also evaluated using the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire before starting the study. Since the total score obtained from this questionnaire \>3.5 is considered as restrictive eating behavior, these individuals were not included in the study.

Participants were served barley bread (BB), oat bread (OB), and white bread (WB), and whole wheat bread (WWB) with a standard breakfast on four different days at least two days apart. Breads were prepared with similar amounts of energy, protein, fat, carbohydrate, and fiber (except WB). The test meal was served to the participants at 09:00 and they were asked to consume it within 15 minutes. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess appetite before breakfast and at 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 minutes after breakfast. Furthermore, the separate VAS components such as hunger, fullness, desire to eat, and prospective food consumption were combined to produce an additional measure termed 'composite appetite score'. For the postprandial glucose assessment, blood glucose measurements were made with the finger-tip glucometer at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 minutes. Postprandial appetite and glucose responses were quantified as the incremental area under the curve (iAUC) calculated according to the trapezoidal rule.

At the end of three hours, the ad libitum lunch was served to the participants as a buffet-style, and the energy and macronutrient intakes in this meal were determined. All foods (meatballs, tuna, sauce pasta, yogurt, salad, white bread, apple, banana, yogurt drink, fruit juice, and water) were weighed using a calibrated kitchen scale with an accuracy of ±1g before being served. At lunch, the participants were asked to consume the foods they wanted and continue eating until they felt completely full. After the participants completed their consumption, the remaining amounts were reweighed and the difference with the initial amounts was accepted as the amount consumed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy Appetitive Behavior

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

White Bread

White bread with a standard test breakfast

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

White Bread

Intervention Type OTHER

Test breakfast with white bread was served after 12-hours of fasting and participants were asked to consume the meal in full, within 15 minutes.

Whole Wheat Bread

Whole wheat bread with a standard test breakfast

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Whole Wheat Bread

Intervention Type OTHER

In a crossover design, this bread was served with a standard breakfast to compare other breads.

Barley Bread

Barley bread with a standard test breakfast

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Barley Bread

Intervention Type OTHER

In a crossover design, this bread was served with a standard breakfast to compare other breads.

Oat Bread

Oat bread with a standard test breakfast

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Oat Bread

Intervention Type OTHER

In a crossover design, this bread was served with a standard breakfast to compare other breads.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

White Bread

Test breakfast with white bread was served after 12-hours of fasting and participants were asked to consume the meal in full, within 15 minutes.

Intervention Type OTHER

Whole Wheat Bread

In a crossover design, this bread was served with a standard breakfast to compare other breads.

Intervention Type OTHER

Barley Bread

In a crossover design, this bread was served with a standard breakfast to compare other breads.

Intervention Type OTHER

Oat Bread

In a crossover design, this bread was served with a standard breakfast to compare other breads.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthy
* Normal-weight (BMI 18.5-25 kg/m2)
* 19-35 years
* Having a \<3.5 score on the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (considered as unrestrictive eating behavior)

Exclusion Criteria

* Applying an energy-restricted diet in the last three months
* Having a change in body weight \>5 kg in the last three months
* Vegans
* Having any chronic diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, etc.
* Physician-diagnosed medications or conditions that influence metabolism
* Having fasting glucose \>100 mg/dl
* Smoking
* Exercising heavily
* Having chewing/swallowing difficulties or sensitivity/allergies to any food to be used in the study
* Lack of appetite
* Pregnant and lactating women
* Skipping breakfast meals
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

35 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

TC Erciyes University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Zeynep Caferoglu, PhD

Assistant Professor Doctor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Zeynep Caferoglu, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Erciyes University Faculty of Health Sciences 38039 Kayseri / Turkey

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Erciyes University Faculty of Health Sciences

Kayseri, Kayseri̇, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Caferoglu Z, Aytekin Sahin G, Gonulalan Z, Hatipoglu N. Effects of whole-grain barley and oat beta-glucans on postprandial glycemia and appetite: a randomized controlled crossover trial. Food Funct. 2022 Oct 3;13(19):10225-10234. doi: 10.1039/d2fo01717b.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36124913 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TSA-2019-8761

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.