Regional Erector Spinae Analgesic Block vs Standard of Care Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT ID: NCT04663269
Last Updated: 2021-04-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE4
5 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-02-24
2020-09-24
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
ESP Block vs Control for Pain Control Following Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT05024344
Dexamethasone Versus Mg Added to Bupivacaine Used in ESPB for Perioperative Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Unilateral Nephrectomy
NCT06501079
Comparison of Perineural Dexamethasone Versus Dexmedetomidine as Adjuvants to Erector Spinae Plane Block in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Trial
NCT07180940
Continuous Nerve Block Block vs Combination of Single Block Plus Intravenous Lidocaine for Postoperative Pain.
NCT04208516
Erector Spinae Block With Ropivacaine and Dexmedetomidine on Opioid Consumption After Lumar Spine Surgeries
NCT05664542
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control
Standard Care Protocol - peritubal block standard local analgesic administration in the form of a peritubal block
Control Test
Peritubal block - standard local analgesic administration
ANES Block
Patients randomized to the erector spinae block (Group 2) will have the block placed in the preoperative area by the anesthesia team. 0-4 mg midazolam and/or 0-100 mcg of fentanyl may be provided prior to and in order to place the block itself. The local anesthetic will diffuse to involve the dorsal and ventral rami of the spinal nerves, achieving a sensory block of the affected area. The erector spinae block analgesic will be administered by the anesthesia team. The analgesic provided in the erector spinae block is 20mL of 0.5% Bupivicaine with 4mg of PF Dexamethasone.
4mg PF Dexamethasone
analgesic provided in the erector spinae block is 20mL of 0.5% Bupivicaine with 4mg of PF Dexamethasone
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
4mg PF Dexamethasone
analgesic provided in the erector spinae block is 20mL of 0.5% Bupivicaine with 4mg of PF Dexamethasone
Control Test
Peritubal block - standard local analgesic administration
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Indiana University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Tim Large
Assistant Professor of Urology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Tim Large, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Indiana University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Methodist University
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Jonnavithula N, Pisapati MV, Durga P, Krishnamurthy V, Chilumu R, Reddy B. Efficacy of peritubal local anesthetic infiltration in alleviating postoperative pain in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2009 May;23(5):857-60. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0634.
Parikh GP, Shah VR, Modi MP, Chauhan NC. The analgesic efficacy of peritubal infiltration of 0.25% bupivacaine in percutaneous nephrolithotomy - A prospective randomized study. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Oct;27(4):481-4. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.86591.
Ozkan D, Akkaya T, Karakoyunlu N, Arik E, Ergil J, Koc Z, Gumus H, Ersoy H. Effect of ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block on postoperative pain after percutaneous nephrolithotomy : prospective randomized controlled study. Anaesthesist. 2013 Dec;62(12):988-94. doi: 10.1007/s00101-013-2253-z. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
Honey RJ, Ghiculete D, Ray AA, Pace KT. A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of intercostal nerve block after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2013 Apr;27(4):415-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0418.
Yang H, Yu X, Hu J, Peng E, Li C, Cui L, Zhao C, Wang S, Wei C, Mei W, Wang S, Ye Z. Usage of Multilevel Paravertebral Block as the Main Anesthesia for Mini-Invasive PCNL: Retrospective Review of 45 Cases with Large Stones. Urol Int. 2017;99(3):326-330. doi: 10.1159/000480094. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
Jonnavithula N, Chirra RR, Pasupuleti SL, Devraj R, Sriramoju V, Pisapati MV. A comparison of the efficacy of intercostal nerve block and peritubal infiltration of ropivacaine for post-operative analgesia following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective randomised double-blind study. Indian J Anaesth. 2017 Aug;61(8):655-660. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_88_17.
Hatipoglu Z, Gulec E, Turktan M, Izol V, Aridogan A, Gunes Y, Ozcengiz D. Comparative study of ultrasound-guided paravertebral block versus intravenous tramadol for postoperative pain control in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Feb 17;18(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0479-7.
Malekpour M, Hashmi A, Dove J, Torres D, Wild J. Analgesic Choice in Management of Rib Fractures: Paravertebral Block or Epidural Analgesia? Anesth Analg. 2017 Jun;124(6):1906-1911. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002113.
Yeying G, Liyong Y, Yuebo C, Yu Z, Guangao Y, Weihu M, Liujun Z. Thoracic paravertebral block versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for pain treatment in patients with multiple rib fractures. J Int Med Res. 2017 Dec;45(6):2085-2091. doi: 10.1177/0300060517710068. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
Miller NL, Matlaga BR, Lingeman JE. Techniques for fluoroscopic percutaneous renal access. J Urol. 2007 Jul;178(1):15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.014. Epub 2007 May 11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
87943342
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.