Dexamethasone Versus Mg Added to Bupivacaine Used in ESPB for Perioperative Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Unilateral Nephrectomy
NCT ID: NCT06501079
Last Updated: 2024-07-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
78 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-05-01
2024-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The current study aims to compare the effect of adding dexamethasone versus magnesium sulfate to bupivacaine in ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block on the severity of postoperative pain.
Primary Objectives:
\- To compare the effect of ESPB without additives to the effect of adding dexamethasone and to the impact of adding magnesium sulfate in the form of post-operative morphine consumption
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine VS Magnesium Sulphate With Bupivacaine in Erector Spinae Block for Thoracotomy Pain
NCT05851768
Erector Spinae Block Using a Dexmedetomidine Versus Magnesium Sulfate as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine
NCT05694897
Erector Spinae Plane Block with Dexmedetomidine and Bupivacain Versus Dexamethasone and Bupivacain for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgeries
NCT06658418
Role of Dexamethasone for Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Total Abdominal Hysterectomy
NCT03769818
Dexmedetomidine vs Dexamethasone as Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Bilevel Erector Spinae Plane Block in Breast Surgeries
NCT05591417
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The current study aims to compare the effect of adding dexamethasone versus magnesium sulfate to bupivacaine in ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block on the severity of postoperative pain and postoperative morphine consumption.
Methodology:
I. Study design:
This is a randomized Controlled Study. It will involve three groups: Control Group (C) receiving erector spinae block with 27ml bupivacaine 0.25% + 3 ml NS, Group (M) receiving 27 ml bupivacaine 0.25% + 3 ml magnesium sulphate 10%, Group (D) receiving 27 ml bupivacaine 0.25% + 8 mg dexamethasone (2 ml) + 1 ml NS.
II. Study setting and location:
National Cancer Institute, Cairo University after approval by the institutional review board.
III. Study population:
Adult patients undergoing unilateral nephrectomy under general anesthesia.
Patients will be randomly assigned to the groups using online random number generator.
Erector Spinae Plane Block technique:
Informed consent, including the risks and benefits of the procedure, should be obtained before carrying out an ESP block. A peri-procedural "timeout" should be performed to confirm the type, side, and location of the procedure and ensure that there are no contraindications.
Standard patient monitoring should be in place, including continuous ECG monitoring, pulse oximetry, and blood pressure measurement in at least 5-minute intervals. Patients should be prepped and draped in sterile conditions. Sterile gloves and surgical cap and a mask are necessary, and the ultrasound probe is placed into the sterile ultrasound probe cover for imaging. The ESP block will be performed at the level of T 10 paraspinal level. The ultrasound transducer should be placed in a cephalocaudal orientation over the midline of the back at the desired level. The probe should then slowly be moved laterally until the transverse process is visible. The transverse process requires differentiation from the rib at that level. The transverse process will be more superficial and wider, while the rib will be deeper and thinner. Erector spinae muscle should be identified superficial to the transverse process. The needle should be inserted superior to the ultrasound probe using an in-plane approach in the cephalad to caudal direction. Once the needle tip is below the erector spinae muscle, a small bolus of local anesthetic should be given through the needle. The erector spinae muscle should be visualized, separating from the transverse process. This separation from the transverse process confirms the proper needle position.
The local anesthetic should then be injected in 5 ml increments, with aspiration after every 5 ml to prevent intravascular injection. Block will be performed preoperatively in the preoperative holding area.
Heart rate and blood pressure to be recorded preoperative, intraoperative and postoperatively
Assessment of pain:
Pain assessment will be done through Visual Analogue Scale. Patients should be informed preoperatively about it and how to use this scale. Starting from recovery time, pain assessment is done by asking the patient to mark the intensity of pain perceived and express it on a 10 cm horizontal scale ranging from no pain at one end to the worst possible pain at the other end.
Assessment of pain is to be done in the recovery unit and at 0,2,4,8,12,18, 24 and 30 hours postoperatively.
Total amount of opioid needed in first 24 hours to be recorded.
Rescue Analgesia:
Intraoperative rescue analgesia will be done by giving fentanyl at dose of 1 mic/Kg. Postoperatively, NSAIDs such as Ketorolac 30 mg I.V infusion if VAS is between 3 to 6, and Morphine 3 mg I.V if VAS equals or is more significant than 6.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
Primary Objectives to compare the effect of ESPB without additives to the effect of adding dexamethasone and to the effect of adding magnesium sulphate in the form of post-operative visual analogue scale (VAS) after 30 hours at rest.
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Normal saline
receiving erector spinae block with 27ml bupivacaine 0.25% + 3 ml NS
ultrasound guided Erector Spinae Plane Block using 27ml bupivacaine 0.25%
ESP block will be performed U/S at the level of T 10 paraspinal level. The ultrasound transducer should be placed in the midline of the back at the desired level. The probe should then slowly be moved laterally until the transverse process is visible. The transverse process requires differentiation from the rib at that level.
Erector spinae muscle should be identified superficial to the transverse process. The needle inserted superior to the ultrasound probe in the cephalad to caudal direction. Once the needle tip is below the erector spinae muscle.
This separation from the transverse process confirms the proper needlemposition.
The local anesthetic should then be injected in 5 ml increments. The block will be performed preoperatively.
magnesium sulphate 10%
receiving erector spinae block with 27 ml bupivacaine 0.25% + 3 ml magnesium sulphate 10%
ultrasound guided Erector Spinae Plane Block using 27ml bupivacaine 0.25%
ESP block will be performed U/S at the level of T 10 paraspinal level. The ultrasound transducer should be placed in the midline of the back at the desired level. The probe should then slowly be moved laterally until the transverse process is visible. The transverse process requires differentiation from the rib at that level.
Erector spinae muscle should be identified superficial to the transverse process. The needle inserted superior to the ultrasound probe in the cephalad to caudal direction. Once the needle tip is below the erector spinae muscle.
This separation from the transverse process confirms the proper needlemposition.
The local anesthetic should then be injected in 5 ml increments. The block will be performed preoperatively.
dexamethasone
receiving erector spinae block with 27 ml bupivacaine 0.25% + 8 mg dexamethasone (2 ml) + 1 ml NS.
ultrasound guided Erector Spinae Plane Block using 27ml bupivacaine 0.25%
ESP block will be performed U/S at the level of T 10 paraspinal level. The ultrasound transducer should be placed in the midline of the back at the desired level. The probe should then slowly be moved laterally until the transverse process is visible. The transverse process requires differentiation from the rib at that level.
Erector spinae muscle should be identified superficial to the transverse process. The needle inserted superior to the ultrasound probe in the cephalad to caudal direction. Once the needle tip is below the erector spinae muscle.
This separation from the transverse process confirms the proper needlemposition.
The local anesthetic should then be injected in 5 ml increments. The block will be performed preoperatively.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ultrasound guided Erector Spinae Plane Block using 27ml bupivacaine 0.25%
ESP block will be performed U/S at the level of T 10 paraspinal level. The ultrasound transducer should be placed in the midline of the back at the desired level. The probe should then slowly be moved laterally until the transverse process is visible. The transverse process requires differentiation from the rib at that level.
Erector spinae muscle should be identified superficial to the transverse process. The needle inserted superior to the ultrasound probe in the cephalad to caudal direction. Once the needle tip is below the erector spinae muscle.
This separation from the transverse process confirms the proper needlemposition.
The local anesthetic should then be injected in 5 ml increments. The block will be performed preoperatively.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients undergoing unilateral nephrectomy
* ASA II / III
Exclusion Criteria
* Age less than 18 years
* Allergy to any of the studied medications
* Mid line incision
* Bilateral nephrectomy
* Distorted anatomy of the back (e.g. kyphoscoliosis)
* Known neurologic disorders, psychiatric disorder or chronic pain
* Local infection
* Hemodynamic instability
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute, Egypt
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ahmed Mohamed Soliman
lecturer of anesthesia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Cancer institute - Cairo University
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AP2404-201-004
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.