Early Detection of Barrett's Esophagus in Participants With Reflux Symptoms in Primary Care

NCT ID: NCT04656392

Last Updated: 2024-04-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

449 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-04-20

Study Completion Date

2024-03-11

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In the Netherlands, the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is increasing. In addition, EAC has a dismal prognosis. Therefore, screening for Barrett's Esophagus (BE) has stimulated interest. Although BE is a known precursor of EAC, a minority of patients with EAC are known with a previous diagnosis of BE. A non-invasive screening tool, such as breath testing, could select patients at risk for BE, after which unsedated transnasal endoscopy (uTNE) can confirm or exclude the diagnosis. The objective is to determine the accuracy and acceptability of a non-invasive screening strategy i.e. breath testing followed by uTNE for BE and EAC.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The ongoing increasing incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in the Netherlands during the last few decades and the still dismal prognosis has stimulated interest in screening for Barrett's esophagus (BE). Although BE is a known precursor of EAC, a minority of patients with EAC (\<10%) are known with a previous diagnosis of BE, and hence, most cases of BE are undiagnosed. Screening programs to detect BE followed by endoscopic surveillance and treatment of dysplasia or early neoplasia seem able to reduce the incidence of EAC and improve survival. A non-invasive screening tool, such as breath testing, could select patients at risk for BE, after which unsedated transnasal endoscopy (uTNE) can confirm or exclude the diagnosis. uTNE offers the possibility of a more acceptable and accurate endoscopic assessment of the esophagus with almost neglectable risks and lower costs compared to conventional endoscopy. The objective is to determine the accuracy and acceptability of a non-invasive screening strategy i.e. breath testing followed by uTNE for BE and EAC.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Barrett Esophagus Esophageal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

The study design is a multi-site prospective cohort study in eight general practices. All participants will receive the breath test with the eNose in the general practice, followed by the uTNE in the hospital.
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Breath test (eNose) followed by uTNE.

All participants will receive the breath test with the eNose in the general practice, followed by the uTNE in the hospital.

Group Type OTHER

Breath test (eNose) followed by uTNE.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

All participants will receive the breath test with the eNose in the general practice, followed by the uTNE in the hospital.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Breath test (eNose) followed by uTNE.

All participants will receive the breath test with the eNose in the general practice, followed by the uTNE in the hospital.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient aged 50 to 75 years;
* Recorded diagnosis of reflux symptoms \>90 days OR
* Recorded prescriptions for acid suppressant therapy for this indication for at least 1 year in the past 5 years
* Written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Upper endoscopy in the previous 5 years;
* A current or previous diagnosis and/or treatment of any type of malignancy (not including basal-cell skin cancer (BCC) and squamous-cell skin cancer (SCC)) within the last five years;
* Already known with a diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus or gastro-esophageal cancer;
* Any argument provided by a patient's own general practitioner not to include the patient;
* Comorbidities precluding transnasal endoscopy (e.g. inability to discontinue oral anticoagulants, history of recurrent epistaxis, allergy to lidocaine derivatives).
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dutch Digestive Diseases Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Radboud University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Peter D. Siersema, Prof.dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Radboud University Medical Center

Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

110769

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Epithelial Damage in GERD
NCT01867931 COMPLETED