Accuracy, Yield and Clinical Impact of a Low-Cost HRME in the Early Diagnosis of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
NCT ID: NCT02018367
Last Updated: 2021-01-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-09-30
2021-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Quality of Life in Barrett's Esophagus and Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease
NCT01572974
Acetic Acid for the Detection of Esophageal Neoplasms
NCT04054713
Study of Cryotherapy Treatment of Barrett's Esophagus and Early Esophageal Cancer
NCT00321958
Endoesophageal Cryotherapy For Ablating Barrett's Esophagus and Early Stage Esophageal Cancer
NCT00628784
Characterization of the Neo-squamous Epithelial Barrier
NCT03077594
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* the diagnostic yield (defined as the proportion of mucosal biopsy samples with neoplasia) of HRME with directed biopsy
\- compared to standard white-light endoscopy with 4-quadrant random biopsy (WL) for the diagnosis of BE-associated neoplasia in flat mucosa as well as mucosal lesions
* the clinical impact of HRME on the diagnosis and endoscopic surveillance of BE- associated neoplasia
* does HRME alter the decision to obtain a mucosal biopsy or perform endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR)
* the total number of total mucosal biopsies taken per procedure; does HRME alter the number of biopsies necessary?
Secondary outcomes:
* sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of HRME for the in-vivo diagnosis of neoplasia in a routine surveillance population of patients with BE (using histopathologic diagnosis of mucosal biopsies as the reference standard)
* the total procedure time for imaging and mucosal biopsy acquisition of HRME - compared with WL, stratified by length of BE (\< 3 cm and \> 3cm)
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Proflavine, high resolution imaging
Proflavine hemisulfate will be used as a topical contrast agent in conjunction with the high resolution imaging device to visualize and image areas suspicious for neoplasia. Biopsies will be taken per Seattle biopsy protocol for Barrett's Esophagus surveillance.
Proflavine, high resolution imaging
5-10mL of proflavine hemisulfate (0.01%) will be sprayed on the esophageal mucosa. The HRME will then be inserted through the biopsy channel of the endoscope and gently placed against the mucosa. The endoscopist will image each discrete lesion observed during white light endoscopy. For each HRME imaged area, an optical read will be obtained followed by a tissue biopsy.
Standard of care
Standard of care examination of the upper GI tract using the standard high resolution endoscope with bipsies taken per Seattle biopsy protocol for Barrett's Esophagus surveillance.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Proflavine, high resolution imaging
5-10mL of proflavine hemisulfate (0.01%) will be sprayed on the esophageal mucosa. The HRME will then be inserted through the biopsy channel of the endoscope and gently placed against the mucosa. The endoscopist will image each discrete lesion observed during white light endoscopy. For each HRME imaged area, an optical read will be obtained followed by a tissue biopsy.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who are unable to give informed consent.
* Known advanced adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus, or dysplastic/suspected malignant esophageal lesion \> 2 cm in size not amenable to EMR
* Patients with a history of a severe allergic reaction (anaphylaxis)
* Patients unable to undergo routine endoscopy with biopsy :
* Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding
* Prothrombin Time \> 50% of control; PTT \> 50 sec, or INR \> 2.0)
* Inability to tolerate sedated upper endoscopy due to cardio-pulmonary instability or other
* Patients with known, untreated esophageal strictures, prior partial esophageal resection, or altered anatomy preventing passage of the endomicroscope
* Patients with known severe esophagitis
* Patients with suspected but no biopsy confirmed BE
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
William Marsh Rice University
OTHER
Baylor College of Medicine
OTHER
Anandasabapathy, Sharmila, M.D.
INDIV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sharmila Anandasabapathy, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Baylor College of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Shin D, Lee MH, Polydorides AD, Pierce MC, Vila PM, Parikh ND, Rosen DG, Anandasabapathy S, Richards-Kortum RR. Quantitative analysis of high-resolution microendoscopic images for diagnosis of neoplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jan;83(1):107-14. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.06.045. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GCO #12-0289, H-36538
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.