A Prospective Randomised Multi - Center Trial on the Repair of Large Hiatal Hernias: Absorbable Mesh vs. Pledgeted Sutures vs. Sutures Only
NCT ID: NCT04591860
Last Updated: 2024-04-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
165 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-05-01
2027-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The primary objective of the present trial is to compare the hiatal hernia recurrence rate between three different methods of cruroplasty in large hiatal hernias: hiatal closure with sutures versus pledgeted sutures versus absorbable mesh (Phasix™ST mesh).
The duration of the study is not limited and depends on the number of cases planned. After enrollment in the study, patients will be followed - up with standardized questionnaires and gastroscopy at 6 months, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years after surgery.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Laparoscopic Lightweight Mesh Repair of Large Hiatal Hernias
NCT01408108
Transfacial Sutures Versus Stapler for Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT00773851
Sutures Versus Polyglactin Mesh in Hiatal Hernia Repair
NCT05201508
A Prospective Trial of a Bio-absorbable Mesh in Challenging Laparoscopic Ventral or Incisional Hernia Repair
NCT02712398
Recurrence Rate After Laparoscopic Repair of Large Hiatal Hernia
NCT03025932
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
The study includes patients who are scheduled to undergo laparoscopic or robot-assisted surgery for a large symptomatic hiatal hernia. A large hiatal hernia is defined as \> 5cm in manometry or gastroscopy or at least 1/3 of the stomach lying intrathoracically. The primary study endpoint is defined as the hernia recurrence rate, objectively assessed by gastroscopy. After inclusion in the study, patients will be followed up 6 months, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years after the operation using standardized questionnaires and gastroscopy.
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sutures only
Patients with a large hiatal hernia undergo the cruroplasty with sutures only.
A large hiatal hernia is defined as \> 5cm in manometry or gastroscopy or at least 1/3 of the stomach lying intrathoracically.
Laparoscopic or robot-assisted hiatal closure (sutures only vs. absorbable mesh vs. pledgeted sutures) and fundoplication according to Toupet
Patients are scheduled to undergo laparoscopic or robot-assisted surgery for a large symptomatic hiatal hernia.The hiatal closure will be done with sutures, pledgeted sutures or absorbable mesh (Phasix™ST mesh). After cruroplasty a fundoplication according to Toupet will be done additionally.
Absorbable Mesh
Patients with a large hiatal hernia undergo the cruroplasty with mesh implantation.
A large hiatal hernia is defined as \> 5cm in manometry or gastroscopy or at least 1/3 of the stomach lying intrathoracically.
Laparoscopic or robot-assisted hiatal closure (sutures only vs. absorbable mesh vs. pledgeted sutures) and fundoplication according to Toupet
Patients are scheduled to undergo laparoscopic or robot-assisted surgery for a large symptomatic hiatal hernia.The hiatal closure will be done with sutures, pledgeted sutures or absorbable mesh (Phasix™ST mesh). After cruroplasty a fundoplication according to Toupet will be done additionally.
Pledgeted sutures
Patients with a large hiatal hernia undergo the cruroplasty with pledgeted sutures.
A large hiatal hernia is defined as \> 5cm in manometry or gastroscopy or at least 1/3 of the stomach lying intrathoracically.
Laparoscopic or robot-assisted hiatal closure (sutures only vs. absorbable mesh vs. pledgeted sutures) and fundoplication according to Toupet
Patients are scheduled to undergo laparoscopic or robot-assisted surgery for a large symptomatic hiatal hernia.The hiatal closure will be done with sutures, pledgeted sutures or absorbable mesh (Phasix™ST mesh). After cruroplasty a fundoplication according to Toupet will be done additionally.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Laparoscopic or robot-assisted hiatal closure (sutures only vs. absorbable mesh vs. pledgeted sutures) and fundoplication according to Toupet
Patients are scheduled to undergo laparoscopic or robot-assisted surgery for a large symptomatic hiatal hernia.The hiatal closure will be done with sutures, pledgeted sutures or absorbable mesh (Phasix™ST mesh). After cruroplasty a fundoplication according to Toupet will be done additionally.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Written informed consent
* ≥ 18 years of age
* Hiatal hernia documented by barium x-ray and/or gastroscopy and/or manometry by one or more of the following criteria:
* \> 5cm hiatal hernia
* 1/3 of the stomach in the thorax
Exclusion Criteria
* Lack of consent to study due to linguistic or mental incomprehension
* Patients in poor general condition (lack of anesthesia ability)
* Pregnancy
* Prior surgery on the stomach or gastroesophageal junction
* Simultaneous surgery because of another illness
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medical University Innsbruck
OTHER
Medical University of Vienna
OTHER
Krankenhaus Barmherzige Schwestern Linz
OTHER
Elisabethinen Hospital
OTHER
Paracelsus Medical University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michael Weitzendorfer, MD
Dr. Michael Weitzendorfer, PhD
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Koch O, von Rahden BHA, Wykypiel H, Schoppmann SF, Fugger R, Rosanelli G, Emmanuel K, Weitzendorfer M. [Planning and Design of a Prospective Randomised Multi-Centre Trial on the Repair of Large Hiatal Hernias with Sutures vs. Pledgeted Sutures vs. Absorbable Mesh]. Zentralbl Chir. 2021 Apr;146(2):204-209. doi: 10.1055/a-1369-9694. Epub 2021 Feb 10. German.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Phasix™ST - Austria
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.