Bariatric SUrgery With Mesh REpair of Ventral Hernia: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT ID: NCT05488288
Last Updated: 2023-08-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE3
354 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-07-24
2030-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
As secondary objectives, the study aims to assess the impact of concomitant VH repair with non absorbable mesh versus suture repair in morbidly obese BS candidates on the following measures: - hernia recurrence at 1 year after randomization; - reoperation for hernia recurrence at 2 years after randomization; - strangulated hernia, surgical infection and mesh bulging at one year after randomization; - postoperative morbidity and mortality at 90 days after randomization; - benefit-risk ratio; - chronic pain at three months, six months, one year and two years after randomization; - quality of life during the two years after randomization; - incremental cost utility ratio; - short- and mid-term weight loss. To study if the efficacy of mesh versus suture VH repair differs according to the type and size of VH and to the surgical technique.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study to Compare Ventral Incisional Hernia by Laparoscopic vs Open Repair With Mesh
NCT00240188
A Prospective Randomised Multi - Center Trial on the Repair of Large Hiatal Hernias: Absorbable Mesh vs. Pledgeted Sutures vs. Sutures Only
NCT04591860
A Prospective, Multicenter All Comers Study of Phasix Mesh for Ventral or Incisional Hernia Repair
NCT02053168
Long Term Complaints After Elective Repair for Small Umbilical or Epigastric Hernias
NCT01501682
Onlay Synthetic Bioabsorbable Mesh Herniorrhaphy Versus Herniorrhaphy Only in the Primary Treatment of Large Hiatal Hernia
NCT05867225
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Hypothesis for the study: abdominal ventral hernia (VH) repair with mesh during bariatric surgery (BS) is more effective than suture repair in preventing VH recurrence. Secondarily, we expect that mesh repair would not increase the risk of surgical site infection.
Population of study participants:
Patients between 18 and 60 years, presenting with VH and scheduled for BS, excluding pregnant women and protected adults.
All consecutive eligible patients will be invited to participate by visceral surgeons during preoperative consultations for BS. Included patients will be randomly assigned (1/1 ratio) to either mesh VH repair (intervention group) or suture VH repair (control group) by visceral surgeons at hospital admission (hospitalization or outpatient surgery) for BS and VH repair.
Patients will be followed according to clinical guidelines for BS follow-up at M1, M3, M6, M9, M12, M18 and M24 after BS.
There will be 29 surgical centers in France (digestive surgeons), targetting 354 eligible patients.
Statistical analysis:
An intention-to-treat statistical analysis will be performed at the end of the follow-up, when primary endpoint of all randomized patients will be documented.
The analysis for the primary endpoint will consist in comparing proportions of hernia recurrence during the two years after surgery between the two arms, using a Chi2 test.
An interim analysis is planned after half of the subjects finished their follow-up, in order to confirm the efficacy of the intervention arm, or alternatively its lack of efficacy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Mesh group
ventral hernia repair with non absorbable mesh placement concomitant to bariatric procedure (sleeve gastrectomy or by-pass).
In this group, the repair technique and the type of mesh are left to the choice of the center, as there are no strong data to demonstrate which technique is the best for VH repair in this population.
Mesh repair
Abdominal ventral hernia (VH) repair with mesh during bariatric surgery. the repair technique and the type of mesh are left to the choice of the center, as there are no strong data to demonstrate which technique is the best for VH repair in this population.
Suture group
suture repair of ventral hernia concomitant to bariatric procedure (sleeve gastrectomy or by-pass).
In this group, the hernia sack is resected through an open approach, and the fascial defect is systematically closed with a slowly absorbable monofilament suture.
Suture repair
The hernia sack is resected through an open approach, and the fascial defect is systematically closed with a slowly absorbable monofilament suture.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Mesh repair
Abdominal ventral hernia (VH) repair with mesh during bariatric surgery. the repair technique and the type of mesh are left to the choice of the center, as there are no strong data to demonstrate which technique is the best for VH repair in this population.
Suture repair
The hernia sack is resected through an open approach, and the fascial defect is systematically closed with a slowly absorbable monofilament suture.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m² or ≥ 35 kg/m² associated with at least one comorbidity that can improve after BS.
* Body Mass Index (BMI) \< 50 kg/m².
* Primary or first recurrent incisional midline VH, umbilical or epigastric, width between 1 cm and 4 cm, on abdominopelvic CT-scan without contrast injection.
* Decision for primary sleeve gastrectomy or by-pass after multidisciplinary discussion.
* Request for BS approved by health insurance authorities.
* Written informed consent from patient.
Exclusion Criteria
* Other types of abdominal hernia (lateral, subxiphoidal, infraumbilical, suprapubic, parastomal, non-midline port-site, and groin hernia).
* Decision of performing BS by laparotomy.
* Reoperation for BS (excepted previous adjustable gastric banding).
* Ongoing abdominal skin infection.
* Emergency surgery.
* ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score\>3.
* Ongoing pregnancy or breast-feeding.
* Patient not covered by social insurance.
* Patient under legal guardianship.
* Patient already included in a clinical trial on hernia recurrence.
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David MOSZKOWICZ, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of visceral and digestive surgery, Louis-Mourier hospital, APHP
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of visceral and digestive surgery, Louis Mourier hospital, APHP
Colombes, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2023-A00658-37
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
APHP211049
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.