TOKA: Custom Made Devices for High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO) - Clinical Investigation
NCT ID: NCT04574570
Last Updated: 2025-08-03
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
25 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-09-14
2023-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The medical device being examined is a custom-made device and therefore does not require a CE mark. Furthermore, the study will serve as a useful method of gathering clinical data and measuring device performance, as well as establishing a potential commercial relationship with the hospital administration.
Study Objectives::
1. to assess the morphology of the knee joint and the improvement of OA following the TOKA® treatment.
2. to Assess the functional outcome of the knee joint and the improvement of OA following the TOKA® treatment.
Outcomes Evaluations::
1. The morphology of the knee joint is assessed by verifying the matching between the planned correction and the post-operative imaging results, along with the investigation of the maintenance of the desired correction at the follow-up meetings. These results are measured through the correction angle, hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA - mechanical axis), Mikulicz point (recorded as a percentage of the tibial width from the medial to the lateral region) and posterior slope, using the imaging techniques.
2. The functional outcome of the knee joint is assessed by a) performing a gait analysis of the patients pre-operatively and post-operatively, b) the use of clinical scoring...
.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Personalised HTO Versus Generic HTO Virtual Clinical Trial
NCT03419598
Custom Guides for Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)
NCT01573208
Evaluation of a New Bi-Condylar Total Knee Prosthesis (TKP) With All-Ceramic Friction (The Forgotten Knee)
NCT06592248
Total Versus Robotic Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Replacement
NCT05290818
MIKROBE Management of Infected Knee Replacements-Obtaining Best Evidence
NCT04458961
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
interventional patient
Personalised High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO) using a patient-specific fixation plate (TOKA®)
High Tibial Osteotomy
Personalised High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO) using a patient-specific fixation plate (TOKA®)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
High Tibial Osteotomy
Personalised High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO) using a patient-specific fixation plate (TOKA®)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients must have completed a consent form for the study
* Patients must be prepared to comply with the pre and post-operative investigations, rehabilitation, attendance schedule and questionnaire schedule of the study
* Patient in whom any varus deformity present is \<20°
* The diagnosis is of unicompartmental medial osteoarthritis of the knee
* Patient has primary diagnosis of Non-Inflammatory Degenerative Joint Disease (NIDJD)
* BMI\<40
* Age range 40 to 65 years
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnancy
* Prisoners
* A patient known to have substance abuse or psychological disorders that could interfere with their ability to comply with the post-operative rehabilitation and assessment schedules
* Patients unable to read or understand the patient information leaflet and consent form
* Patient has a known sensitivity to device materials.
* Patient has a Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 40.
* Patient has an active or suspected latent infection in or about the affected knee joint at time of study device implantation.
* Patient has received any orthopaedic surgical intervention to the lower extremities within the past year or is expected to require any orthopaedic surgical intervention to the lower extremities, other than the HTO to be enrolled in this study, within the next year.
* Patient requires bilateral HTO or has a history of unsuccessful contralateral partial replacement or HTO.
* Patient has chronic heart failure (NYHA Stage ≥ 2)
* Patient has a neuromuscular or neurosensory deficiency, which limits the ability to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the device.
* Patient is diagnosed with a systemic disease (e.g. Lupus Erythematosus) or a metabolic disorder (e.g. Paget's disease) leading to progressive bone deterioration.
* Patient is immunologically suppressed or receiving steroids in excess of normal physiological requirements (e.g. \> 30 days).
40 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Bath
OTHER
3D Metal Printing Ltd
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Bologna, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Akizuki S, Shibakawa A, Takizawa T, Yamazaki I, Horiuchi H. The long-term outcome of high tibial osteotomy: a ten- to 20-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 May;90(5):592-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B5.20386.
Bedson J, Croft PR. The discordance between clinical and radiographic knee osteoarthritis: a systematic search and summary of the literature. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 Sep 2;9:116. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-116.
Elson DW, Petheram TG, Dawson MJ. High reliability in digital planning of medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy, using Miniaci's method. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Jul;23(7):2041-8. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-2920-x. Epub 2014 Mar 1.
Ren YM, Duan YH, Sun YB, Yang T, Hou WY, Zhu RS, Tian MQ. Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Using Autograft versus Allograft: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Knee Surg. 2020 Jun;33(6):565-575. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1681065. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
Harris JD, McNeilan R, Siston RA, Flanigan DC. Survival and clinical outcome of isolated high tibial osteotomy and combined biological knee reconstruction. Knee. 2013 Jun;20(3):154-61. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.12.012. Epub 2013 Mar 9.
Kallala RF, Vanhegan IS, Ibrahim MS, Sarmah S, Haddad FS. Financial analysis of revision knee surgery based on NHS tariffs and hospital costs: does it pay to provide a revision service? Bone Joint J. 2015 Feb;97-B(2):197-201. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B2.33707.
KELLGREN JH, LAWRENCE JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957 Dec;16(4):494-502. doi: 10.1136/ard.16.4.494. No abstract available.
Konopka JF, Gomoll AH, Thornhill TS, Katz JN, Losina E. The cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment of medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis in younger patients: a computer model-based evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 May 20;97(10):807-17. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00925.
Niinimaki TT, Eskelinen A, Mann BS, Junnila M, Ohtonen P, Leppilahti J. Survivorship of high tibial osteotomy in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: Finnish registry-based study of 3195 knees. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Nov;94(11):1517-21. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B11.29601.
Smith WB 2nd, Steinberg J, Scholtes S, Mcnamara IR. Medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: age-stratified cost-effectiveness of total knee arthroplasty, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, and high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Mar;25(3):924-933. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3821-3. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
Verra WC, Witteveen KQ, Maier AB, Gademan MG, van der Linden HM, Nelissen RG. The reason why orthopaedic surgeons perform total knee replacement: results of a randomised study using case vignettes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Aug;24(8):2697-703. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3961-5. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
Zaffagnini S, Dal Fabbro G, Lucidi GA, Agostinone P, Belvedere C, Leardini A, Grassi A. Personalised opening wedge high tibial osteotomy with patient-specific plates and instrumentation accurately controls coronal correction and posterior slope: Results from a prospective first case series. Knee. 2023 Oct;44:89-99. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2023.07.011. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
Ruggeri M, Gill HS, Leardini A, Zaffagnini S, MacLeod A, Ortolani M, Faccia F, Grassi A, Fabbro GD, Durante S, Belvedere C. Superimposition of ground reaction force on tibial-plateau supporting diagnostics and post-operative evaluations in high-tibial osteotomy. A novel methodology. Gait Posture. 2022 May;94:144-152. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.02.028. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CE-AVEC 623/2019 DISP/IOR TOKA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.