Single-use Efficiency Instruments With Patient Specific Technique (MyKnee®) Versus Traditional Metal Instruments With Conventional Surgical Technique

NCT ID: NCT03148379

Last Updated: 2023-08-08

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

32 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-10-11

Study Completion Date

2022-03-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To compare economic factors and the rate of adverse events between two types of instrumentation used for total knee replacement: Single-use Efficiency Instruments with Patient Specific Technique (MyKnee®) Traditional Metal Instruments with Conventional Surgical Technique

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Customized patient instruments

Experimental group: Patients randomized into this group will undergo surgery utilizing single-use Efficiency Instruments with patient-specific technique (MyKnee® patient-matched cutting blocks)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Customized patient instruments

Intervention Type DEVICE

Single use efficiency instruments and cutting blocks specifically made for each patient using pre-op MRI or CT scans to make bone cuts and select implant size.

Traditional metal instruments

Control Group: Patients will undergo conventional surgical technique

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Traditional Metal Instruments

Intervention Type DEVICE

Traditional metal instrument will be used to make bone cuts and size the components in this control group.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Customized patient instruments

Single use efficiency instruments and cutting blocks specifically made for each patient using pre-op MRI or CT scans to make bone cuts and select implant size.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Traditional Metal Instruments

Traditional metal instrument will be used to make bone cuts and size the components in this control group.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Single-use Efficiency Instruments with Patient Specific Technique (MyKnee®) Traditional Metal Instruments with Conventional Surgical Technique

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18 to 75 years
* BMI ≤35
* Undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty due to osteoarthritis (primary or post-traumatic OA)
* Able and willing to give consent and to comply with study requirements, including follow up visit at 6 weeks

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant women or those seeking to become pregnant. Pregnancy test is administered prior to surgery as part of routine care by the hospital / surgery center for all female patients of childbearing potential
* Is participating in another clinical study
* Has inflammatory arthritis
* Has knee avascular necrosis
* Has severe deformity, defined as greater than 10 degrees varus or valgus relative to the mechanical axis
* Has retained hardware in the knee that requires removal or interferes with Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) procedure
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medacta USA

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mukesh Ahuja, MBBS, MS

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Medacta USA

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tandem Clinical Research, LLC

Marrero, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Ortho Montana

Billings, Montana, United States

Site Status

Orthopedic Associates Meadville

Meadville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Texas Orthopedics

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Jordan Valley Medical Center of Orthopedics Rehabilitation and Excellence

West Jordan, Utah, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20161119

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Anatomic Congruent Prosthetic Knee Design
NCT03633201 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA