Trial Outcomes & Findings for Single-use Efficiency Instruments With Patient Specific Technique (MyKnee®) Versus Traditional Metal Instruments With Conventional Surgical Technique (NCT NCT03148379)
NCT ID: NCT03148379
Last Updated: 2023-08-08
Results Overview
Total time patient is in operating room
COMPLETED
NA
32 participants
Day of Surgery
2023-08-08
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Customized Patient Instruments
Experimental group: Patients randomized into this group will undergo surgery utilizing single-use Efficiency Instruments with patient-specific technique (MyKnee® patient-matched cutting blocks)
Customized patient instruments: Single use efficiency instruments and cutting blocks specifically made for each patient using pre-op MRI or CT scans to make bone cuts and select implant size.
|
Traditional Metal Instruments
Control Group: Patients will undergo conventional surgical technique
Traditional Metal Instruments: Traditional metal instrument will be used to make bone cuts and size the components in this control group.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
21
|
11
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
20
|
11
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Customized Patient Instruments
n=21 Participants
Experimental group: Patients randomized into this group will undergo surgery utilizing single-use Efficiency Instruments with patient-specific technique (MyKnee® patient-matched cutting blocks)
Customized patient instruments: Single use efficiency instruments and cutting blocks specifically made for each patient using pre-op MRI or CT scans to make bone cuts and select implant size.
|
Traditional Metal Instruments
n=11 Participants
Control Group: Patients will undergo conventional surgical technique
Traditional Metal Instruments: Traditional metal instrument will be used to make bone cuts and size the components in this control group.
|
Total
n=32 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
67.24 years
n=21 Participants
|
65 years
n=11 Participants
|
66.47 years
n=32 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
6 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=11 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=32 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
15 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=11 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=32 Participants
|
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
21 participants
n=21 Participants
|
11 participants
n=11 Participants
|
32 participants
n=32 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day of SurgeryTotal time patient is in operating room
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Customized Patient Instruments
n=21 Participants
Experimental group: Patients randomized into this group will undergo surgery utilizing single-use Efficiency Instruments with patient-specific technique (MyKnee® patient-matched cutting blocks)
Customized patient instruments: Single use efficiency instruments and cutting blocks specifically made for each patient using pre-op MRI or CT scans to make bone cuts and select implant size.
|
Traditional Metal Instruments
n=11 Participants
Control Group: Patients will undergo conventional surgical technique
Traditional Metal Instruments: Traditional metal instrument will be used to make bone cuts and size the components in this control group.
|
|---|---|---|
|
OR Total Time
|
93.00 minutes
Interval 81.9 to 113.27
|
92.72 minutes
Interval 82.73 to 101.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day of SurgeryTime to open surgical instruments
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Customized Patient Instruments
n=21 Participants
Experimental group: Patients randomized into this group will undergo surgery utilizing single-use Efficiency Instruments with patient-specific technique (MyKnee® patient-matched cutting blocks)
Customized patient instruments: Single use efficiency instruments and cutting blocks specifically made for each patient using pre-op MRI or CT scans to make bone cuts and select implant size.
|
Traditional Metal Instruments
n=11 Participants
Control Group: Patients will undergo conventional surgical technique
Traditional Metal Instruments: Traditional metal instrument will be used to make bone cuts and size the components in this control group.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Opening Instruments
|
8.23 minutes
Interval 4.2 to 33.5
|
7.42 minutes
Interval 3.7 to 14.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day of SurgeryTime to set up back surgical table
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Customized Patient Instruments
n=21 Participants
Experimental group: Patients randomized into this group will undergo surgery utilizing single-use Efficiency Instruments with patient-specific technique (MyKnee® patient-matched cutting blocks)
Customized patient instruments: Single use efficiency instruments and cutting blocks specifically made for each patient using pre-op MRI or CT scans to make bone cuts and select implant size.
|
Traditional Metal Instruments
n=11 Participants
Control Group: Patients will undergo conventional surgical technique
Traditional Metal Instruments: Traditional metal instrument will be used to make bone cuts and size the components in this control group.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Back Table Setup Time
|
21.33 minutes
Interval 5.68 to 31.32
|
21.62 minutes
Interval 1.42 to 37.73
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day of SurgeryTime tourniquet is on patient during surgery
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Customized Patient Instruments
n=21 Participants
Experimental group: Patients randomized into this group will undergo surgery utilizing single-use Efficiency Instruments with patient-specific technique (MyKnee® patient-matched cutting blocks)
Customized patient instruments: Single use efficiency instruments and cutting blocks specifically made for each patient using pre-op MRI or CT scans to make bone cuts and select implant size.
|
Traditional Metal Instruments
n=11 Participants
Control Group: Patients will undergo conventional surgical technique
Traditional Metal Instruments: Traditional metal instrument will be used to make bone cuts and size the components in this control group.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Tourniquet Time
|
58.75 minutes
Interval 47.43 to 76.48
|
58.25 minutes
Interval 46.07 to 72.13
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day of SurgeryTime from incision to skin closure during surgery
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Customized Patient Instruments
n=21 Participants
Experimental group: Patients randomized into this group will undergo surgery utilizing single-use Efficiency Instruments with patient-specific technique (MyKnee® patient-matched cutting blocks)
Customized patient instruments: Single use efficiency instruments and cutting blocks specifically made for each patient using pre-op MRI or CT scans to make bone cuts and select implant size.
|
Traditional Metal Instruments
n=11 Participants
Control Group: Patients will undergo conventional surgical technique
Traditional Metal Instruments: Traditional metal instrument will be used to make bone cuts and size the components in this control group.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Incision to Skin Closure
|
55.37 minutes
Interval 41.77 to 112.92
|
55.03 minutes
Interval 43.57 to 63.87
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day of SurgeryTime to prepare bone for implant during surgery
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Customized Patient Instruments
n=21 Participants
Experimental group: Patients randomized into this group will undergo surgery utilizing single-use Efficiency Instruments with patient-specific technique (MyKnee® patient-matched cutting blocks)
Customized patient instruments: Single use efficiency instruments and cutting blocks specifically made for each patient using pre-op MRI or CT scans to make bone cuts and select implant size.
|
Traditional Metal Instruments
n=11 Participants
Control Group: Patients will undergo conventional surgical technique
Traditional Metal Instruments: Traditional metal instrument will be used to make bone cuts and size the components in this control group.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bone Prep Time
|
17.83 minutes
Interval 12.47 to 32.78
|
17.67 minutes
Interval 9.95 to 17.87
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day of SurgeryTime to resection patella during surgery
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Customized Patient Instruments
n=21 Participants
Experimental group: Patients randomized into this group will undergo surgery utilizing single-use Efficiency Instruments with patient-specific technique (MyKnee® patient-matched cutting blocks)
Customized patient instruments: Single use efficiency instruments and cutting blocks specifically made for each patient using pre-op MRI or CT scans to make bone cuts and select implant size.
|
Traditional Metal Instruments
n=11 Participants
Control Group: Patients will undergo conventional surgical technique
Traditional Metal Instruments: Traditional metal instrument will be used to make bone cuts and size the components in this control group.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Patella Resection Time
|
2.27 minutes
Interval 0.83 to 5.93
|
2.22 minutes
Interval 1.18 to 3.32
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day of SurgeryTime to clean up following surgery
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Customized Patient Instruments
n=21 Participants
Experimental group: Patients randomized into this group will undergo surgery utilizing single-use Efficiency Instruments with patient-specific technique (MyKnee® patient-matched cutting blocks)
Customized patient instruments: Single use efficiency instruments and cutting blocks specifically made for each patient using pre-op MRI or CT scans to make bone cuts and select implant size.
|
Traditional Metal Instruments
n=11 Participants
Control Group: Patients will undergo conventional surgical technique
Traditional Metal Instruments: Traditional metal instrument will be used to make bone cuts and size the components in this control group.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Clean-up Time
|
7.67 minutes
Interval 1.48 to 20.98
|
8.40 minutes
Interval 1.37 to 24.13
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hours or at discharge if patient does not stay overnightPost op 1 day hemoglobin range
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Customized Patient Instruments
n=21 Participants
Experimental group: Patients randomized into this group will undergo surgery utilizing single-use Efficiency Instruments with patient-specific technique (MyKnee® patient-matched cutting blocks)
Customized patient instruments: Single use efficiency instruments and cutting blocks specifically made for each patient using pre-op MRI or CT scans to make bone cuts and select implant size.
|
Traditional Metal Instruments
n=11 Participants
Control Group: Patients will undergo conventional surgical technique
Traditional Metal Instruments: Traditional metal instrument will be used to make bone cuts and size the components in this control group.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Hemoglobin Range
|
13.3 grams per deciliter (g/dl)
Interval 8.9 to 18.1
|
13.3 grams per deciliter (g/dl)
Interval 11.5 to 15.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day of SurgeryWeigh surgical waste at the end of each surgery
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Customized Patient Instruments
n=21 Participants
Experimental group: Patients randomized into this group will undergo surgery utilizing single-use Efficiency Instruments with patient-specific technique (MyKnee® patient-matched cutting blocks)
Customized patient instruments: Single use efficiency instruments and cutting blocks specifically made for each patient using pre-op MRI or CT scans to make bone cuts and select implant size.
|
Traditional Metal Instruments
n=11 Participants
Control Group: Patients will undergo conventional surgical technique
Traditional Metal Instruments: Traditional metal instrument will be used to make bone cuts and size the components in this control group.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Surgical Waste Weight
|
29.8 pounds
Interval 21.0 to 35.3
|
21.1 pounds
Interval 17.6 to 23.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-OperativeRadiographic analysis of mechanical axis alignment
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Customized Patient Instruments
n=21 Participants
Experimental group: Patients randomized into this group will undergo surgery utilizing single-use Efficiency Instruments with patient-specific technique (MyKnee® patient-matched cutting blocks)
Customized patient instruments: Single use efficiency instruments and cutting blocks specifically made for each patient using pre-op MRI or CT scans to make bone cuts and select implant size.
|
Traditional Metal Instruments
n=11 Participants
Control Group: Patients will undergo conventional surgical technique
Traditional Metal Instruments: Traditional metal instrument will be used to make bone cuts and size the components in this control group.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mechanical Axis
|
175.5 degrees
Interval 165.9 to 186.6
|
175.85 degrees
Interval 168.1 to 184.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Post-OperativeRadiographic analysis of mechanical axis alignment
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Customized Patient Instruments
n=20 Participants
Experimental group: Patients randomized into this group will undergo surgery utilizing single-use Efficiency Instruments with patient-specific technique (MyKnee® patient-matched cutting blocks)
Customized patient instruments: Single use efficiency instruments and cutting blocks specifically made for each patient using pre-op MRI or CT scans to make bone cuts and select implant size.
|
Traditional Metal Instruments
n=11 Participants
Control Group: Patients will undergo conventional surgical technique
Traditional Metal Instruments: Traditional metal instrument will be used to make bone cuts and size the components in this control group.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mechanical Axis
|
78.4 degrees
Interval 0.0 to 179.5
|
72.6 degrees
Interval 0.8 to 186.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-OperativeRadiographic analysis of Tibial Posterior Slope
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Customized Patient Instruments
n=21 Participants
Experimental group: Patients randomized into this group will undergo surgery utilizing single-use Efficiency Instruments with patient-specific technique (MyKnee® patient-matched cutting blocks)
Customized patient instruments: Single use efficiency instruments and cutting blocks specifically made for each patient using pre-op MRI or CT scans to make bone cuts and select implant size.
|
Traditional Metal Instruments
n=11 Participants
Control Group: Patients will undergo conventional surgical technique
Traditional Metal Instruments: Traditional metal instrument will be used to make bone cuts and size the components in this control group.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Tibial Slope
|
7.6 degrees
Interval 2.0 to 12.0
|
7.6 degrees
Interval 3.0 to 12.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Post-OperativeRadiographic analysis of Tibial Posterior Slope
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Customized Patient Instruments
n=20 Participants
Experimental group: Patients randomized into this group will undergo surgery utilizing single-use Efficiency Instruments with patient-specific technique (MyKnee® patient-matched cutting blocks)
Customized patient instruments: Single use efficiency instruments and cutting blocks specifically made for each patient using pre-op MRI or CT scans to make bone cuts and select implant size.
|
Traditional Metal Instruments
n=11 Participants
Control Group: Patients will undergo conventional surgical technique
Traditional Metal Instruments: Traditional metal instrument will be used to make bone cuts and size the components in this control group.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Tibial Slope
|
4.3 degrees
Interval 0.0 to 6.5
|
4.2 degrees
Interval 2.7 to 8.4
|
Adverse Events
Customized Patient Instruments
Traditional Metal Instruments
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Rena Mandino, Director of Clinical Research
Medacta USA
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: GT60