Total Versus Robotic Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Replacement
NCT ID: NCT05290818
Last Updated: 2025-11-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
159 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-08-26
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Trial Evaluating TKR Compared to BKR Performed Using Stryker's Mako Robot
NCT02650284
A Trial of Mechanical Axis With Soft Tissue Release Balancing vs Functional Alignment With Bony Release Balancing in Total Knee Replacement Using Stryker's Mako Robot
NCT04600583
MAKO Total Knee Artroplasty
NCT05744895
Study to Evaluate Patient Outcomes and Safety and Effectiveness of Robotic Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Replacements Versus Conventional Unicompartmental Knee for Subjects With Primary Arthritis of the Knee Joint Involving One (UKA) Compartment (Medial or Lateral)
NCT06036212
Early Outcomes of MAKO Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
NCT05736601
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Robotic-arm assisted (r)UKA offers a greater level of precision of component positioning compared to manual UKA and more recently the survivorship of rUKA has been shown to be greater than manual UKA. Early functional outcomes following robotic UKA appear to be better than those observed after manual TKA. Therefore, the benefits of UKA could potentially be enjoyed by the patient without the increased risk of revision when compared to TKA for those with medical compartment disease.
The primary aim of this study is to compare the early knee specific functional outcome of rUKA with manually performed (m)TKA when performed for patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee.
A single centre randomised control trial will be carried out powered to the Oxford knee score.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty
This group will receive a conventional manual Triathlon (Stryker) TKA with a cruciate retaining polyethylene insert. The surgeon will then make bone cuts using a manual jig and a hand held saw to prepare the bone surfaces for the implant. A measured resection technique will be employed with a three degree tibial slope. The surgeon will use a conventional jig alignment technique for intramedullary referencing for the femur and extra medullary referencing for the tibia. Once the implant is in position the knee is then balanced by the "feel" though a range of movement and soft tissue releases will be performed as required to balance the knee in flexion and extension.
Triathlon (Stryker) Total Knee Arthroplasty
Triathlon (Stryker) TKA with a cruciate retaining polyethylene insert.
Robotic Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
This group will receive the cemented Restoris MCK (Mako, Stryker) with a highly crossed linked (X3) polyethylene insert through a less invasive to the knee joint. Instead of using a manual jig and a hand held burr will be used to prepare the bone surfaces for the implant, the MAKO robotic arm will be used by the surgeon to cut the bone at the required alignment. The information from the CT scan will be used to create a 3D model of the patient's bony anatomy and will used to plan the positioning of the implant. Once the trackers are in place registration of the knee joint surface is performed. The specified bone cuts are then performed using the robotic arm, aiming to gap balance the knee through a full range of movement.
MAKO™ Partial Knee Arthroplasty
The robotic-arm will be used to position a partial knee arthroplasty.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
MAKO™ Partial Knee Arthroplasty
The robotic-arm will be used to position a partial knee arthroplasty.
Triathlon (Stryker) Total Knee Arthroplasty
Triathlon (Stryker) TKA with a cruciate retaining polyethylene insert.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Intact anterior cruciate ligament
* Full thickness and good quality lateral cartilage
* Correctable intra-articular varus deformity and intact medial collateral ligament
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grades 1 and 2
* Male or female, age 50 - 75 at the time of listing for surgery
* Suitable candidate for a cruciate retaining TKA (Triathlon prosthesis) and a UKA
Exclusion Criteria
* Fixed flexion of \>10 degrees
* Patient is unable to comply with the study protocol (incl. refusal for CT scan) or functional assessments
* Female participants who are pregnant, lactating or planning pregnancy during the course of the study
* Requires patella resurfacing or lateral compartment has significant OA
* Inability to understand the patient information for the study, provide written informed consent or answer study questionnaires for cognitive or language reasons
* Inflammatory disorder e.g. rheumatoid arthritis
* Symptomatic foot, hip or spine pathology
* Prior surgery (other than arthroscopy) or septic arthritis of the knee
* Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the study,
50 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
NHS Lothian
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nicholas D Clement, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NHS Lothian
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nicholas Clement
Edinburgh, Lothian, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Robinson PG, Clement ND, Hamilton D, Blyth MJG, Haddad FS, Patton JT. A systematic review of robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: prosthesis design and type should be reported. Bone Joint J. 2019 Jul;101-B(7):838-847. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B7.BJJ-2018-1317.R1.
Clement ND, Bell A, Simpson P, Macpherson G, Patton JT, Hamilton DF. Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty has a greater early functional outcome when compared to manual total knee arthroplasty for isolated medial compartment arthritis. Bone Joint Res. 2020 May 16;9(1):15-22. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.91.BJR-2019-0147.R1. eCollection 2020 Jan.
Clement ND, Deehan DJ, Patton JT. Robot-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for patients with isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis is cost-effective: a markov decision analysis. Bone Joint J. 2019 Sep;101-B(9):1063-1070. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B9.BJJ-2018-1658.R1.
Clement ND; TRAKER Research Group; Scott CEH, Macpherson GJ, Simpson PM, Leitch G, Patton JT, Ahmed I, Amin AK, Gaston P, Goudie E, Goudie S, Macdonald DM, Martinson E, Moran M, Wade F. Total versus robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee replacement (TRAKER) for medial compartment osteorthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Bone Jt Open. 2025 Feb 10;6(2):164-177. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.62.BJO-2024-0155.R1.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Home page of Edinburgh Orthopaedics
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AC19080
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.