Early Outcomes of MAKO Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
NCT ID: NCT05736601
Last Updated: 2025-03-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
95 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-12-27
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
MAKO Total Knee Artroplasty
NCT05744895
MAKO-Uni-Knee Arthroplasty Clinical Outcomes and Function
NCT03354195
Clinical Outcomes of Knee Replacement
NCT01705366
RCT: Mako Medial Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty vs Oxford Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty
NCT04095637
A Trial of Mechanical Axis With Soft Tissue Release Balancing vs Functional Alignment With Bony Release Balancing in Total Knee Replacement Using Stryker's Mako Robot
NCT04600583
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
UKA MAKO
Prospective group- Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) will be assessed using the FocusMotion app survey
focus motion knee brace
knee brace that captures knee motion
TKA MAKO
Control group-Already collected data on patient reported out comes using the FocusMotion app survey
focus motion knee brace
knee brace that captures knee motion
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
focus motion knee brace
knee brace that captures knee motion
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
B. Age 18 years of age or older
C. Willing to sign informed consent
D. Willing to return for all follow-up visits
E. Smartphone or tablet device capable of running the FocusMotion platform
Exclusion Criteria
B. Personal history of DVT or PE
C. Inflammatory arthritis
D. Peripheral vascular disease
E. Opioid use greater than 5 days per week
F. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory allergy
G. Walking aid for musculoskeletal or neurologic issue other than operative joint
H. Bilateral medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
I. Patient with an active infection or suspected infection in the operative joint
J. The absolute and relative contraindications stated in the FDA cleared labeling for the device
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Stryker Nordic
INDUSTRY
Washington University School of Medicine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Washington University Medical School
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kayani B, Konan S, Tahmassebi J, Pietrzak JRT, Haddad FS. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved early functional recovery and reduced time to hospital discharge compared with conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Bone Joint J. 2018 Jul;100-B(7):930-937. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B7.BJJ-2017-1449.R1.
Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222.
Kazarian GS, Barrack TN, Okafor L, Barrack RL, Nunley RM, Lawrie CM. High Prevalence of Radiographic Outliers and Revisions with Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Jul 1;102(13):1151-1159. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01277.
Nam D, Berend ME, Nunley RM, Della Valle CJ, Berend KR, Lombardi AV, Barrack RL. Residual Symptoms and Function After Unicompartmental and Total Knee Arthroplasty: Comparable to Normative Controls? J Arthroplasty. 2016 Oct;31(10):2161-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.064. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
Lee BS, Cho HI, Bin SI, Kim JM, Jo BK. Femoral Component Varus Malposition is Associated with Tibial Aseptic Loosening After TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Feb;476(2):400-407. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000012.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
202203201
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.