RCT: Mako Medial Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty vs Oxford Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty
NCT ID: NCT04095637
Last Updated: 2025-07-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
140 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-11-24
2026-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The primary objective in this study is to compare accuracy of component positioning as assessed by postoperative low radiation dose CT scan between conventional Jig-based Oxford UKA with navigation control and Mako robotic UKA.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Early Outcomes of MAKO Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
NCT05736601
MAKO-Uni-Knee Arthroplasty Clinical Outcomes and Function
NCT03354195
UKA Manual Versus UKA MAKO Robotic
NCT03447626
Study to Evaluate Patient Outcomes and Safety and Effectiveness of Robotic Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Replacements Versus Conventional Unicompartmental Knee for Subjects With Primary Arthritis of the Knee Joint Involving One (UKA) Compartment (Medial or Lateral)
NCT06036212
Total Versus Robotic Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Replacement
NCT05290818
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Mako medial UKA
Mako medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty
Medial knee arthroplasty
Surgical intervention where the medial portion of the knee is replaced by an artificial metal and polyethylene implant
Oxford media UKA
Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with navigation control
Medial knee arthroplasty
Surgical intervention where the medial portion of the knee is replaced by an artificial metal and polyethylene implant
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Medial knee arthroplasty
Surgical intervention where the medial portion of the knee is replaced by an artificial metal and polyethylene implant
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient and Surgeon are in agreement that UKA is the most appropriate treatment
* Patient is fit for surgical intervention following review by surgeon and anaesthetist
* Patient is between 40-80 years of age at time of surgery
* Gender: male and female
* Patient must be capable of giving informed consent and agree to comply with the postoperative review program
* Patient must be a permanent resident in an area accessible to the study site
* Patient must have sufficient postoperative mobility to attend follow-up clinics and allow for radiographs to be taken
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient is not medically fit for surgical intervention
* Patient requires revision surgery following previously failed correctional osteotomy or ipsilateral UKA
* Patient is immobile or has another neurological condition affecting musculoskeletal function
* Patient is less than 40 years of age or greater than 80 years of age
* Patient is already enrolled on another concurrent clinical trial
* Patient is unable or unwilling to sign the informed consent form specific to this study
* Patient is unable to attend the follow-up programme
* Patient is non-resident in local area or expected to leave the catchment area postoperatively
40 Years
80 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Stryker Instruments
INDUSTRY
University College, London
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Fares S Haddad
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
UCL Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Babar Kayani
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UCL Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UCL Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kayani B, Konan S, Tahmassebi J, Ayuob A, Moriarty PD, Haddad FS. Robotic-arm assisted medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty versus jig-based unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with navigation control: study protocol for a prospective randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2020 Aug 17;21(1):721. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04631-5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
16/0773
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.