A Comparison of Patients Receiving a Unicompartmental Knee Replacement With Robotic Assistance or With Conventional Instrumentation
NCT ID: NCT04992078
Last Updated: 2022-06-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-01-01
2022-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
There have been significant developments in knee replacement surgery over recent years. In particular, the introduction of robotic surgical systems, such as the NAVIO and CORI systems (Smith+Nephew Plc). These systems are hand-held devices which can support the surgeon with the knee replacement procedure, the systems are image-free and do not require the patient to undergo any scans (such as CT scans).
Comparisons of robotic systems to conventional instruments have demonstrated that robotic platforms produce fewer positioning errors in total knee replacement. This can result in more precise knee alignment and better outcomes following surgery. With both the NAVIO and CORI Surgical Systems there is a reduction in radiation exposure due to them being image-free.
At present, there is some evidence available for the long-term outcomes of knee replacement implanted using robotic assistance (i.e. 2-10 years) however this study is designed to look at the early outcomes following UKR. There is no literature to date to show that robotic-assisted UKR is superior to conventional methods, within the early post-operative period (up to 12 months).
This study is designed to show that the NAVIO/CORI surgical systems are better than conventional methods for UKR. The hypothesis is that they will be cost-effective, will reduce the time a patient spends in hospital following their surgery, will improve patient satisfaction during the early recovery period and will improve the patient's early post-operative mobility and function.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study to Evaluate Patient Outcomes and Safety and Effectiveness of Robotic Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Replacements Versus Conventional Unicompartmental Knee for Subjects With Primary Arthritis of the Knee Joint Involving One (UKA) Compartment (Medial or Lateral)
NCT06036212
Cemented Versus Cementless Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
NCT05935878
The Assessment of Patient Specific Instrumentation for Unicompartmental Knee Replacement
NCT02748096
Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty With and Without Navigational Unit
NCT00862316
Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty Versus Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Anteromedial Osteoarthritis of the Knee
NCT02430129
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Robotic-Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (R-UKR)
NAVIO/CORI Surgical System
NAVIO/CORI Surgical System
Unicompartmental knee replacement with robotic assistance
Conventional-Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (C-UKR)
Non-robotic conventional instrumentation
Non-robotic conventional instrumentation
Unicompartmental knee replacement with non-robotic conventional instrumentation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
NAVIO/CORI Surgical System
Unicompartmental knee replacement with robotic assistance
Non-robotic conventional instrumentation
Unicompartmental knee replacement with non-robotic conventional instrumentation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subject must be aged 18 years or older at the time of surgery
* Subject is listed for a primary unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR)
* The indication for the UKR is primary arthritis of the knee joint involving one compartment
* The subject agrees to give informed consent to participate in the study including consenting to any incidental findings being reported to their General Practioner (GP)
* The subject agrees to consent to and to follow the study visit schedule
* The subject plans to be available throughout the 1-year post-operative period
* Routine radiographic assessment is possible
Exclusion Criteria
* Subject is listed for a simultaneous bilateral UKR
* Subject does not understand written or spoken English used in the informed consent form
* Subject has active infection or sepsis
* Subject is to have a Smith+Nephew Journey II UNI implanted by non-robotic conventional instrumentation
* Subject is not available throughout the 1-year post-operative period
* Subject, in the opinion of the investigator, has a neuromuscular disorder that prohibits control of the index joint
* Subject is undergoing the surgery as a private patient
* Patients who, in the opinion of the clinical staff, do not have capacity to give consent
* Women who are pregnant
* Subjects with a medical or physical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude safe subject participation in the study
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Smith & Nephew Orthopaedics AG
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Iain McNamara
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Clinical Research and Trials Unit (Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, UK)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kilcreene Regional Orthopaedic Hospital
Kilkenny, , Ireland
Royal Orthopaedic Hospital
Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom
Edinburgh Royal Infirmary
Edinburgh, , United Kingdom
Central Middlesex Hospital
London, , United Kingdom
St Mary's Hospital
London, , United Kingdom
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital
Norwich, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NAVIO+JOURNEYUNI.2021.02
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.