Fluid Responsiveness in Spontaneously Ventilating Patient

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-03-05

Study Completion Date

2021-07-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to find out if non-invasive dynamic parameters can predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneous breathing patients.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

A Prospective Observational Cohort Study of Awake Prone Position Ventilation Strategy in Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure

NCT05570903

Acute Respiratory Failure

UNKNOWN

Study of Neural Inspiratory Time and Expiratory Delay in Patient and Health During Spontaneous Breathing and Ventilation

NCT02817035

State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease

COMPLETED NA

Effects of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation on the Right Ventricular Function

NCT05710419

Pneumonia Atelectasis ARDS

UNKNOWN

Changes in Lung Aeration and Inspiratory Effort With and Without Awake Prone

NCT05719103

Respiratory Distress Syndrome Ventilation Therapy; Complications

RECRUITING NA

Clinical Assessment Method in Patients Using Non-invasive Ventilation

NCT04053777

Respiratory Failure

UNKNOWN

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Knowing when to give fluids to the patient is very important in fluid therapy.It is appropriate to administer it to patients whose cardiac output will increase when the fluid is administered (a patient with fluid responsiveness). Appropriate fluid administration can hemodynamically stabilize the patient's condition and reduce unnecessary fluid administration, thereby reducing complications that occur when fluid is insufficient or excessive fluid is administered.

The most commonly used dynamic variables in clinical practice are pulse pressure variation (PPV), stroke volume variation (SVV), and systolic pressure variation that can be obtained by invasive arterial tube insertion. However, recently a non-invasive monitoring method is being used in more and more areas, and in many cases it is necessary to closely monitor the patient's hemodynamic status without mounting an arterial catheter. Therefore, if the variables measured by a non-invasive method can predict fluid responsiveness at a reliable level, it will be of great help in clinical practice.

According to previous studies, dynamic variables can relatively accurately predict fluid responsiveness only in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. However, in actual clinic, it is necessary to evaluate fluid reactivity even in patients who are not under mechanical positive pressure ventilation. Accurate fluid treatment should be performed during or after surgery under spinal anesthesia in the recovery room. In addition, there are cases in which dynamic variables must be monitored non-invasively in spontaneous breathing patients who do not undergo mechanical ventilation even in intensive care units.

It is clinically meaningful to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneous breathing patients using such a non-invasive method of monitoring. However, there is limited data on how to evaluate fluid responsiveness in these patient groups. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate whether fluid responsiveness can be predicted in spontaneous breathing patients using non-invasive dynamic variables.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fluid Responsiveness

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Fluid challenge responder

If the ratio of the stroke volume change after passive leg raising is the same or larger than 10%, the patient is assigned to RESPONDER group.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Passive leg raising

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Raise the patient's lower limb at a 45 degree angle while lying down

Fluid challenge non-responder

If the ratio of the stroke volume change after passive leg raising is less than 10%, the patient is assigned to RESPONDER group.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Passive leg raising

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Raise the patient's lower limb at a 45 degree angle while lying down

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Passive leg raising

Raise the patient's lower limb at a 45 degree angle while lying down

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* for patients undergoing surgery under actual spinal anesthesia whose estimated blood loss during surgery is moderate to high (e.g. total knee arthroplasty, total hip arthroplasty)
* Patients with a history of cerebrovascular disease
* Patients with a history of 1 or 2 vessel disease
* Left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) Patients with 30% or more and less than 55% of these patients
* Patients who need close hemodynamic monitoring during operation
* ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) physical status classification system I, II, III
* no difficulty in passive leg raising maneuver

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients unable to communicate
* Patients who cannot or have difficulty in PLR (passive leg raising) maneuver (patients who cause pain when performing PLR due to trauma of the lower extremities, patients with spine disease that causes pain during PLR, and patient applying splint due to a fracture of the lower extremity)
* Patients unable to attach the finger cuff of the ClearSight sytem to one of the fingers of both hands. (Patients applying a splint due to a fracture of both upper limbs, etc.)
* Patients unable to perform transthoracic ultrasound examination (multiple trauma patients with rib fracture, etc.)
* Patients having difficulty obtaining blood pressure waveforms through the ClearSight system due to poor peripheral vascular perfusion (uncontrolled diabetes patients, patients with peripheral vascular disease, etc.)
* Patients with arrhythmia with moderate or higher risk such as atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter
* Heart failure patients with less than 30% of the left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF) on echocardiography or patients with moderate to severe left ventricular wall motor dysfunction, or patients with cardiovascular disease of 3 vessel disease
* Other patients who are not appropriate to participate in the study as judged by the researcher

Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No