Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
1244 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-09-29
2020-10-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Participants: Participants will be recruited through Prime Panels and will be US-based adults (18 years old and older) who consumed red meat in the past 30 days.
Procedures (methods): After completing a screening question about meat consumption, participants will review a consent form. If they select to participate in the study, participants will be randomly assigned to view control messages, red meat-related environment messages, or red meat-related health messages. They will be asked a series of questions about these messages.
Participants will also be asked about grocery shopping preferences and standard demographics questions.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Developing and Evaluating Product Messaging
NCT04716010
Red and Processed Meat Effects on the Metabolome and Microbiome
NCT05274906
Effects of Replacing Red Meat With Legumes on Biomarkers of Chronic Diseases in Healthy Men (Leg4Life)
NCT04599920
Documentary to Encourage Plant-based Eating
NCT04507087
Comparing a Healthy Beef-Centric Diet to a Healthy U.S.-Style Diet on Metabolic Health Outcomes in Pre-Diabetic Adults
NCT07269847
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The potential of using widespread communication campaigns, such as Meatless Monday, to reduce meat consumption by educating individuals on the associated health and environmental risks appears to be promising. However, the current literature is missing information regarding what types of messages are most effective (e.g. negative environmental messages vs. negative health messages). To address this knowledge gap, our study will collect quantitative data in measurable outcomes to understand effectiveness and comprehension of environmental messages and health messages to reduce meat consumption.
Setting: This is an online study using Qualtrics, so this research does not involve talking to human participants.
Recruitment: Participants will be recruited through Prime Panels, a survey research firm through which participants voluntarily sign up to participate in research studies.
Informed Consent: Participants will read a written consent document that includes information about the study's purpose, expectations, and possible risks and benefits. Participants will acknowledge that they have read and agreed to the terms by clicking forward.
Randomization: Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: 1) control (about checking their credit score), 2) environment-focused Meatless Monday messages, or 3) health-focused Meatless Monday messages.
Assessment: Using an online platform (Qualtrics), participants will answer a screening question about red meat consumption. If they are eligible (consumption of red meat 1 time per week or more), they will proceed to the main study after reading and agreeing to the written consent form. Participants will then answer two questions about their belief in climate change. Participants will then view four messages in their ascribed conditions. After viewing all 4 messages, participants will answer a series of questions about the messages they viewed. Then, participants will answer a series of demographic questions. Participants will also answer questions about grocery shopping preferences.
Detailed description of the trial arms: This study is a three-armed between subjects' design. Participants will be randomized to view a set of four messages either about the environmental harms of meat production (intervention), the health harms of meat consumption (intervention), or about checking their credit score (control). The environmental and health harms messages were obtained from existing publicly available messages from the Meatless Monday campaign.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Environment-focused Meatless Monday messages
Four environmental messages from the Meatless Monday campaign.
Environmental message
Participants will be randomized to view a set of four messages about the environmental harms of meat production from the Meatless Monday campaign.
Health-focused Meatless Monday messages
Four health messages from the Meatless Monday campaign.
Health message
Participants will be randomized to view a set of four messages about the health harms of meat consumption from the Meatless Monday campaign.
Neutral Message
Four neutral messages about checking one's credit score.
Neutral Message
Participants will be randomized to view a set of four messages about checking their credit score.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Environmental message
Participants will be randomized to view a set of four messages about the environmental harms of meat production from the Meatless Monday campaign.
Health message
Participants will be randomized to view a set of four messages about the health harms of meat consumption from the Meatless Monday campaign.
Neutral Message
Participants will be randomized to view a set of four messages about checking their credit score.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Be able to read and speak English
* Be able to take a computer survey in English
* Currently reside in the United States
* Consumed red meat in the past 30 days
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Wellcome Trust
OTHER
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hannah Rayala
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Lindsey Smith Taillie, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Carolina Population Center
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
14380
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
20-2552
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.