Opioid Approach Bias Modification

NCT ID: NCT04436926

Last Updated: 2024-06-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-03-01

Study Completion Date

2023-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To investigate the neurobiological mechanisms underlying opioid approach bias during a pilot RCT of opioid approach bias modification. The investigators are combining novel ultra-high field MRI technology with the promising treatment of modifying cognitive bias away from detrimental prescription drug use will generate novel neural data and potentially yield a new therapeutic tool to reduce problematic opioid use.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The proposed study is a pilot prospective, parallel groups, randomized, double blind, sham training-controlled, 6-session (over 2 weeks) clinical trial of opioid approach bias modification (OABM) in 20 male and female veterans with chronic pain at high risk for opioid-related adverse events at the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, between ages 18-69. The study consists of screening, 2-week cognitive training, Week-3 post-assessment. Assessment of the neurobiological mechanisms of opioid approach bias will be administered at baseline and Week-3.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Opioid Use Chronic Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

opioid approach bias training

Immediately following screening, patients will be randomly assigned to receive 6 sessions of opioid approach bias modification taking place over two weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

opioid approach bias modification

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The investigators will use a training version of the Approach-Avoidance Task (AAT), in which patients are asked to respond to the format of presented pictures, irrespective of the pictures' content. Pushing a presented picture away will decrease picture size, whereas pulling a picture closer will increase size. There are 2 categories of pictures; 20 different opioid and 20 different non-medication alternative pain managing activities. Training effect is achieved by presenting opioid pictures in push format only and non-opioid pictures in pull format only. Two hundred training trials are presented per session.

sham training

Immediately following screening, patients will be randomly assigned to receive 6 sessions of sham training taking place over two weeks.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

sham training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Sham training is identical to opioid approach bias training, except pictures are presented randomly in both formats.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

opioid approach bias modification

The investigators will use a training version of the Approach-Avoidance Task (AAT), in which patients are asked to respond to the format of presented pictures, irrespective of the pictures' content. Pushing a presented picture away will decrease picture size, whereas pulling a picture closer will increase size. There are 2 categories of pictures; 20 different opioid and 20 different non-medication alternative pain managing activities. Training effect is achieved by presenting opioid pictures in push format only and non-opioid pictures in pull format only. Two hundred training trials are presented per session.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

sham training

Sham training is identical to opioid approach bias training, except pictures are presented randomly in both formats.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male and female veterans eligible for VA services
* Ages 18-69
* Chronic pain (current pain lasting ≥ 90 days)
* Prescribed chronic opioids (≥ 90 days in past year)
* High risk for opioid-related averse outcomes (≥ 20mg morphine equivalent daily dose).

Exclusion Criteria

* Psychotic, bipolar disorders or other psychiatric disorders judged to be unstable by the PI
* Current or past history of the following: intrinsic cerebral tumors, cerebrovascular accident/disease, brain aneurysm, arteriovenous malformations, surgical implantation of neurostimulators or cardiac pacemakers, demyelinating and neurodegenerative diseases, penetrating traumatic brain injury, and any other MRI contraindications.
* No female participant will be pregnant or actively attempting to conceive to prevent any unnecessary exposure to high magnetic fields or radio frequency energy to the unborn child.
* Concurrent participation in a treatment study
* Moderately Severe/Severe withdrawal from opioids based on a score of 25 or more on the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

69 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of California, San Francisco

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Steven Batki, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, San Francisco

David Pennington, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, San Francisco

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

VA Medical Center San Francisco

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

19-29607

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.