Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
140 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-01-31
2015-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Molecular and Functional PET-fMRI Measures of Analgesia in Migraine
NCT01970943
The Warmth, Anticipation, Sensation, Aversion, and Body-part Imaging Study
NCT04653064
Pain Pathways in the Brain
NCT00078364
An fMRI Study of Opioid-related Changes in Neural Activity
NCT02818036
Brain Imaging Study on Biomarkers for Chronic Back Pain
NCT02991625
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Because this is not a traditional clinical trial, there are not traditional efficacy criteria, rather the outcomes are changes in brain function from manipulations of patient expectation and classical conditioning.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
BASIC_SCIENCE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Placebo
Asymptomatic control participants receive Natural History and Placebo instructions in a within-subject design. There are no patients, or active agents in this study. It is not a Clinical Trial.
Placebo Instructions
There is no intervention in this study. It is not a Clinical Trial. The study is an investigation of the neural basis of placebo analgesia.
Control condition
The control condition represents a no-intervention, repeated baseline control, since the "active" intervention in this study is placebo.
Control condition
This protocol represents an investigation of the neural mechanisms of placebo analgesia. As such, it does not represent the traditional clinical trial design. Instead the "active" intervention is a placebo, and the comparison condition is a no-intervention control.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Placebo Instructions
There is no intervention in this study. It is not a Clinical Trial. The study is an investigation of the neural basis of placebo analgesia.
Control condition
This protocol represents an investigation of the neural mechanisms of placebo analgesia. As such, it does not represent the traditional clinical trial design. Instead the "active" intervention is a placebo, and the comparison condition is a no-intervention control.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* english speaking
Exclusion Criteria
* pregnant
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Florida
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael E Robinson, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Florida
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sevel LS, O'Shea AM, Letzen JE, Craggs JG, Price DD, Robinson ME. Effective connectivity predicts future placebo analgesic response: A dynamic causal modeling study of pain processing in healthy controls. Neuroimage. 2015 Apr 15;110:87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.056. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
Robinson ME, Staud R, Price DD. Pain measurement and brain activity: will neuroimages replace pain ratings? J Pain. 2013 Apr;14(4):323-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.05.007.
Letzen JE, Sevel LS, Gay CW, O'Shea AM, Craggs JG, Price DD, Robinson ME. Test-retest reliability of pain-related brain activity in healthy controls undergoing experimental thermal pain. J Pain. 2014 Oct;15(10):1008-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.06.011. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
Letzen JE, Craggs JG, Perlstein WM, Price DD, Robinson ME. Functional connectivity of the default mode network and its association with pain networks in irritable bowel patients assessed via lidocaine treatment. J Pain. 2013 Oct;14(10):1077-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.04.003. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
Kisaalita NR, Robinson ME. Analgesic placebo treatment perceptions: acceptability, efficacy, and knowledge. J Pain. 2012 Sep;13(9):891-900. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.06.003. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
Kisaalita N, Staud R, Hurley R, Robinson M. Placebo use in pain management: The role of medical context, treatment efficacy, and deception in determining placebo acceptability. Pain. 2014 Dec;155(12):2638-2645. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.09.029. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
Craggs JG, Price DD, Robinson ME. Enhancing the placebo response: functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence of memory and semantic processing in placebo analgesia. J Pain. 2014 Apr;15(4):435-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.12.009. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
R01 AT001424-05A
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.