Upper Limb Robotic Rehabilitation During COVID-19 Outbreak
NCT ID: NCT04392453
Last Updated: 2022-02-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
22 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-10-26
2021-05-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aims of this study are: (a) to evaluate the feasibility of the bedside use of a novel rehabilitation device for upper limb in patients with stroke; (b) to evaluate the motor and cognitive outcomes of the treatment; (c) to validate the instrumental outcomes provided by the device.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Robotic Telerehabilitation of the Upper Limb in Stroke
NCT05250934
Upper Limb Robotic Rehabilitation After Stroke
NCT03243123
Robot-assisted Rehabilitation of the Upper Limb in Acute and Subacute Post-stroke Patients
NCT01102309
Robot-assisted Rehabilitation of Hand by Paralysis of the Upper Limb After Stroke
NCT01936298
Multi-segmental Robotic and Technological Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke
NCT02879279
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. evaluate the feasibility of the bedside use of a novel portable rehabilitation device for upper limb in patients with stroke in an inpatient setting;
2. assess motor and cognitive outcomes of the treatment;
3. validate the instrumental outcomes provided by the device.
Forty subacute stroke patients with upper limb hemiplegia will be enrolled. Patients' upper limb will be treated with a novel portable robotic device (Icone, Heaxel). The robot will be transferred to each patient's room, where the rehabilitation session will be performed, thanks to the portability of the device. During the treatment, patients will execute "exergames" involving elbow flexion-extension, shoulder protraction-retraction, internal-external rotation, flexion-extension and abduction-adduction. The exercises will be selected among the available ones to train both motor and cognitive functions. The rehabilitation intervention will include 30 rehabilitation sessions, each lasting 45 minutes, three to five times a week. In addition to the upper limb treatment, patients will receive a rehabilitation treatment for the lower limbs.
For Aim 1, the usability and the acceptability of the device and the satisfaction with the treatment will be evaluated at the end of the rehabilitation intervention by means of the System Usability Scale (SUS), the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), and the Likert scale, respectively.
For Aim 2, the clinical effect of the treatment with the robot will be investigated by means of the following scales, assessed both at baseline and at discharge: the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the upper extremity (FMA-UE), the Motricity Index (MI), the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), the Modified Barthel Index (mBI), the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
For Aim 3, at baseline, each patient will perform the kinematic and kinetic assessment provided by the robot twice, one day apart, to assess the reliability of the kinematic parameters provided by the robot; moreover, the kinematic and kinetics assessment will be performed every ten rehabilitation sessions, to analyze the responsiveness of the kinematic parameters and possible "plateau" in the recovery process.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Robotic therapy
Upper limb robotic rehabilitation by means of the portable robot Icone.
Robotic therapy
The treatment with the robot Icone will include 30 sessions, each session lasting 45 minutes, with a frequency from three to five times a week. The treatment will be provided in the patient's room. Patients will execute upper limb movement involving elbow flexion-extension, shoulder protraction-retraction, internal-external rotation, flexion-extension, and abduction-adduction. Visual and auditory feedback will be provided during the tasks. The exercises will train both motor and cognitive functions.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Robotic therapy
The treatment with the robot Icone will include 30 sessions, each session lasting 45 minutes, with a frequency from three to five times a week. The treatment will be provided in the patient's room. Patients will execute upper limb movement involving elbow flexion-extension, shoulder protraction-retraction, internal-external rotation, flexion-extension, and abduction-adduction. Visual and auditory feedback will be provided during the tasks. The exercises will train both motor and cognitive functions.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* time latency within 6 months from stroke (subacute patients);
* age between 35-85 years;
* cognitive abilities adequate to understand the experiments and the follow instructions
* upper limb impairment (FMA-UE score ≤58);
* ability to give written consent;
* compliance with the study procedures.
Exclusion Criteria
* inability to understand the instructions required for the study;
* fixed contractions in the affected limb (ankylosis, Modified Ashworth Scale equal to 4);
* severe deficits in visual acuity.
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Irene Giovanna Aprile
MD, PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Irene Aprile, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi
Rome, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FDG_Icone
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.