Robot-assisted Rehabilitation of the Upper Limb in Acute and Subacute Post-stroke Patients

NCT ID: NCT01102309

Last Updated: 2011-06-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

27 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-10-31

Study Completion Date

2011-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this study is to determine if robot aided rehabilitation therapy can be equivalent to or more effective than conventional rehabilitation therapy at promoting functional recovery of the paretic upper limb in acute and subacute stroke patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study aims to test a robotic rehabilitation protocol which involves the use of a robotic device (NeReBot) as an alternative to the conventional rehabilitation treatment. NeReBot is a 3-degree-of-freedom robotic device, which can be programmed by the therapist to perform repetitive assistive movements (flexion and extension, adduction and abduction, pronation and supination, circular) of the upper limb (shoulder and elbow), combined with a visual and acoustic display. Acute and subacute stroke patients (≤20 days post-stroke) will be randomized into two groups with a procedure by a computer program: the experimental group (EG) and the control group (CG). Both groups will receive a total daily treatment time of 120 minutes for five days a week and for five weeks. The EG will perform the conventional functional rehabilitation (proprioceptive exercises, verticalization, gait training, paretic hand and wrist mobilization, without mobilizing the proximal paretic arm) and occupational therapy for 80 minutes a day, while the proximal paretic arm will be treated by NeReBot for 40 minutes a day. For the CG, NeReBot therapy is substituted by 40 minutes of conventional mobilization of the proximal paretic arm by the therapist.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke Cerebrovascular Accident Upper Extremity Paresis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental Group (EG)

Group assigned to robot plus conventional therapy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Robot therapy (NeReBot)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Rehabilitation therapy of the affected arm with NeRebot for five weeks, five times weekly for 40 minutes, plus 80 minutes of conventional therapy

Conventional therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Conventional rehabilitation therapy of the affected arm for five weeks, five times weekly for 120 minutes

Control Group (CG)

Group assigned to conventional therapy only

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Conventional rehabilitation therapy of the affected arm for five weeks, five times weekly for 120 minutes

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Robot therapy (NeReBot)

Rehabilitation therapy of the affected arm with NeRebot for five weeks, five times weekly for 40 minutes, plus 80 minutes of conventional therapy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional therapy

Conventional rehabilitation therapy of the affected arm for five weeks, five times weekly for 120 minutes

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. recent unilateral single stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) verified by brain CT or MRI;
2. sufficient cognitive and language skills to understand the instructions of the operator (assessed by Modified Mini-Mental State Examination \> 21);
3. patients with upper limb paralysis (Motor Power score between 8 and 12);
4. written informed consent signed by the patient (or an authorized representative).

Exclusion Criteria

1. cardiovascular instability (severe uncontrolled hypertension, severe coronary artery disease, etc.) or orthopedic, or neurological conditions;
2. presence of multiple cerebrovascular lesions (usually the result of many ischemic episodes in the past);
3. early appearance of marked spasticity (≥ 3 according to Ashworth Scale);
4. joint pain or limited joint range of motion (ROM) of the upper limb that results in the inability to complete the protocol;
5. severe neuropsychologic impairment (global aphasia, severe attention deficit or neglect), affecting the patient's ability to follow instructions;
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Padova

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Eremo Hospital, Arco

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Eremo Hospital of Arco (TN), Italy

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mario Armani, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Eremo Hospital, Arco

Stefano Masiero, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Padova

Giulio Rosati, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Padova

Aldo Rossi

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Padova

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Eremo Hospital of Arco

Arco, TN, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Masiero S, Armani M, Rosati G. Upper-limb robot-assisted therapy in rehabilitation of acute stroke patients: focused review and results of new randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(4):355-66. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2010.04.0063.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21674388 (View on PubMed)

Masiero S, Armani M, Ferlini G, Rosati G, Rossi A. Randomized trial of a robotic assistive device for the upper extremity during early inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 May;28(4):377-86. doi: 10.1177/1545968313513073. Epub 2013 Dec 6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24316679 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.rehabrobotics.it

Website of the rehabilitation robotics research group in Padua, Italy

http://www.mechatronics.it/index.php?lingua=ENG&pag=res&sub=att&id=16

Description of the robotic device employed in the clinical trial

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FIN-TN-2007

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Evaluation of Robot Assisted Neuro-Rehabilitation
NCT01253018 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2