Feasibility and Efficacy of a Robotic Device for Hand Rehabilitation
NCT ID: NCT02628418
Last Updated: 2016-09-15
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-05-31
2014-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy of Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation of Hand Paralysis After Stroke
NCT02711787
Robot-assisted Hand Rehabilitation for Patients With Stroke
NCT03392493
Robot-assisted Rehabilitation of Hand by Paralysis of the Upper Limb After Stroke
NCT01936298
Robotic Rehabilitation Vs Occupational Therapy Chronic Stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation
NCT06884553
Rehabilitation With and Without Robot and Allied Digital Technologies in Stroke Patients
NCT06547827
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Regarding upper limb rehabilitation, several research groups have developed robotic devices to provide passive and/or active movements. Their use appears to reduce the motor deficit of the arm and affected hand and to improve hand function both at the wrist and fingers. Hence, the evidence supporting specific robot-assisted rehabilitation of the hand is very promising even if further study is required.In particular, evidence is limited about the benefit of passive exercises and mobilization of the hemiplegic upper limb following stroke, and further research is called for.
In this study the investigators used Gloreha, a new hand rehabilitation glove that provides computer-controlled, repetitive and passive mobilization of the fingers, with multi-sensory feedback. The purpose of the study was to evaluate in the rehabilitation of patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke in the sub-acute phase: 1) the feasibility of this new neuromotor rehabilitation device 2) its efficacy in improving arm function abilities, and 3) the costs involved.
Post-stroke patients admitted for inpatient rehabilitation between May 2013 and January 2014 were screened for enrollment. Eligible patients were randomly assigned, following a simple randomization procedure (computerized random numbers) conducted independently of the study investigators, to Treatment group or Control group, on a 1:1 ratio.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Gloreha Group
The patients in the "Gloreha Group" underwent to following interventions:
1. General Rehabilitation
2. Specific hand rehabilitation by Gloreha device
General Rehabilitation
All patients underwent basic rehabilitation following the guidelines according to the Bobath concept. Mobilization performed by physiotherapist of the lower and upper limbs through passive and/or active manoeuvres, gait training, standing and functional exercises and speech rehabilitation.
Specific hand rehabilitation by Gloreha device
Each training session consisted of six parts:
1. A sequence of digital joint flexion/extension exercises, from the thumb to the fifth finger (7 min);
2. 7 min of a number sequence (counting from one to five);
3. A sequence of thumb-finger opposition movements from the 2nd to the 5th finger (7 min)
4. A sequence of wave-like finger movements (7 min)
5. A sequence of fist opening/closing (7 min)
6. A sequence of flexion-extension of the fingers alternated with flexion-extension of the thumb (5 min).
Control Group
The patients in the Control Group underwent to following interventions:
1. General Rehabilitation
2. Specific hand rehabilitation performed by physiotherapist
General Rehabilitation
All patients underwent basic rehabilitation following the guidelines according to the Bobath concept. Mobilization performed by physiotherapist of the lower and upper limbs through passive and/or active manoeuvres, gait training, standing and functional exercises and speech rehabilitation.
Specific hand rehabilitation performed by physiotherapist
The activities were:
1. Flexion-extension of the fingers (10 min);
2. Thumb opposition with the other fingers keeping the forearm in supine position (10 min);
3. Adduction and abduction of the fingers (10 min);
4. Global movement of the hand consisting in reaching for a 0.5l bottle of water, taking hold of it, pouring water into a glass, and then putting the bottle down and letting go of it (10 min).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
General Rehabilitation
All patients underwent basic rehabilitation following the guidelines according to the Bobath concept. Mobilization performed by physiotherapist of the lower and upper limbs through passive and/or active manoeuvres, gait training, standing and functional exercises and speech rehabilitation.
Specific hand rehabilitation by Gloreha device
Each training session consisted of six parts:
1. A sequence of digital joint flexion/extension exercises, from the thumb to the fifth finger (7 min);
2. 7 min of a number sequence (counting from one to five);
3. A sequence of thumb-finger opposition movements from the 2nd to the 5th finger (7 min)
4. A sequence of wave-like finger movements (7 min)
5. A sequence of fist opening/closing (7 min)
6. A sequence of flexion-extension of the fingers alternated with flexion-extension of the thumb (5 min).
Specific hand rehabilitation performed by physiotherapist
The activities were:
1. Flexion-extension of the fingers (10 min);
2. Thumb opposition with the other fingers keeping the forearm in supine position (10 min);
3. Adduction and abduction of the fingers (10 min);
4. Global movement of the hand consisting in reaching for a 0.5l bottle of water, taking hold of it, pouring water into a glass, and then putting the bottle down and letting go of it (10 min).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* peripheral nerve injury;
* uncontrolled inflammation;
* severe cognitive and behavioral disorders;
* neurodegenerative and neuromuscular diseases;
* Ashworth spasticity index ≥ 3.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Palmira Bernocchi
Researcher, Care Continuity Unit, Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri, Institute of Lumezzane, (Brescia), Italy
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Vanoglio F, Bernocchi P, Mule C, Garofali F, Mora C, Taveggia G, Scalvini S, Luisa A. Feasibility and efficacy of a robotic device for hand rehabilitation in hemiplegic stroke patients: a randomized pilot controlled study. Clin Rehabil. 2017 Mar;31(3):351-360. doi: 10.1177/0269215516642606. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.