The Role of Different Prefrontal Areas in Visual Metacognition

NCT ID: NCT04263766

Last Updated: 2023-09-15

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

76 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-02-22

Study Completion Date

2022-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study will use transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to investigate the causal role of different brain regions during visual perception. TMS is a well-established technique used by hundreds of labs in the world. The risks associated with the technique are well understood and can be minimized by strict adherence to established safety guidelines. In the proposed study, the investigators will use TMS to specifically address the topic of how metacognitive evaluation is supported by the two prefrontal areas: the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and the anterior prefrontal cortex (aPFC). The data will be collected from healthy adults and will ultimately deepen the investigator's understanding of the mechanisms behind the normal processes related to confidence generation and metacognition.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Participants will complete a task on visual perception and receive TMS in order to assess which regions of the brain are important for confidence generation in perceptual tasks. The task will involve judging the identity of visual stimuli (oriented black-and-white gratings) and providing a confidence rating on the judgment that they performed.

The researchers will deliver TMS to several brain regions such as the anterior prefrontal cortex (aPFC), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and a control site. The researchers will then investigate participants' accuracy and confidence levels depending on where TMS was delivered. The researchers expect that aPFC TMS will decrease the metacognitive sensitivity of the participants, whereas DLPFC TMS will decrease their average confidence level. TMS will be delivered time locked to the onset of the stimulus and the researchers will investigate what is the critical period of involvement of a given region.

The TMS protocol is well within the established safety limits. Participants will be required to fill out screening and demographic forms delivered at the Center for Advanced Brain Imaging (CABI). In order to dose appropriately the TMS stimulation, it is necessary to perform motor threshold determination. Motor threshold (MT) is defined as the minimum magnetic flux needed to elicit a visual hand twitch (in the contralateral first dorsal interosseus muscle). MT is the standard in the field for determining the intensity of TMS for each individual to reduce seizure risk. The scalp region producing the largest hand twitch will be identified. At that scalp location, the lowest TMS intensity able to elicit 5 visible twitches in 10 trials at this site will be determined. Individual MT will be used to determine the intensity of stimulation for each individual, as recommended by safety guidelines. This procedure usually takes about 5 minutes and also serves the purpose of acquainting participants to TMS stimulation. In this study, the researchers will use intensities between 100 and 120% of MT, even though the safety guidelines allow for stimulation intensities of at least 130% of MT.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

TMS manipulation. Within-subjects design. Each participant will receive TMS to three different sites: DLPFC, aPFC, and a control site.
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Healthy Adult Volunteers

The experiment has a within-subject design where each subject will receive TMS to different brain areas. The analysis will involve comparing the effects of TMS to different regions.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Intervention Type OTHER

TMS will be delivered to different brain areas in order to establish their contribution to visual metacognition.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation

TMS will be delivered to different brain areas in order to establish their contribution to visual metacognition.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* right-handed
* adults 18-40
* with normal or corrected-to-normal vision

Exclusion Criteria

* history of seizures
* family history of epilepsy
* stroke
* severe headaches
* metal anywhere in the head (excluding the mouth)
* cardiac pacemakers
* current use of medication for neurological or psychiatric conditions
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Georgia Institute of Technology

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dobromir A. Rahnev, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Georgia Institute of Technology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Center for Advance Brain Imaging

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

5R01MH119189

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

H20033

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.