Effectiveness and Safety of Induction of Labour Using a Double Balloon Catheter (INDOBA)
NCT ID: NCT04163744
Last Updated: 2019-11-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
200 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-10-10
2021-02-02
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The first part of this process is called cervical ripening. The goal is to facilitate the process of cervical softening, thinning, and dilating with resultant reduction in the rate of failed induction and induction to delivery time. Cervical remodeling is a critical component of normal parturition.
Effective methods for cervical ripening include the use of mechanical and pharmacological methods.
There are many induction methods: pharmacological and mechanical.
Nowadays, induction of labour is one of the most frequent obstetric interventions, performed in 25% of pregnancies. Generally, better maternal and neonatal outcomes are achieved if the risks of continuing pregnancy outweigh the benefits.
Cervical ripening is the first part of the induction process, which consists in relaxing and softening the uterine cervix prior to the onset of uterine dynamics.
For this purpose, there are available pharmacological (mainly prostaglandin) and mechanical methods (including the balloon probes: Foley catheter or double cervical balloon). Despite being equally effective in vaginal delivery and caesarean section rate, there has been registered an increased risk of uterine hyperdynamic with the use of prostaglandin in contrast to the use of balloon probes, which may lead to an increased risk of fetal distress.
Concerning balloon probes, various published studies conclude that it is an effective and safe cervical ripening method, without increasing the risk of maternal infection (chorioamnionitis / endometritis) or neonatal infection.
The use of balloon probes could be established as first-choice method of induction of labour, reducing the risk of uterine hyperdynamic and the likelihood of intrauterine fetal distress derived from the use of prostaglandin.
The balloon probe safety makes it an ideal method for performing cervical ripening at home (out-patient) in low-risk pregnancies, increasing the satisfaction of women who desire it and reducing the economic cost for the hospital.
The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness and safety of double balloon catheter (CRB-Cook®) in induction of labour.
The main objective is to provide evidence that there are no differences in caesarean section rate between induction of labour performed with Cook double balloon catheter in out-patient and in-patient compared with a cohort of induction of labour with pharmacological methods (dinoprostone and misoprostol).
Two clinical studies will be carried out for this purpose:
1. Prospective cohort observational study
2. Historical case-control study
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Induction to Labour With Double Cervical Ballon at Home Versus at Hospital
NCT06053073
DOuble-BAlloon Versus PROstaglandin E2 for Cervical Ripening in Low Risk Pregnancies
NCT04747301
Efficacy of Induction of Labor on Term Using a Double Balloon Catheter Compared to Dinoprostone Vaginal-insert
NCT01720394
Labor Induction With Dinoprostone in Oppose to Cervical Ripening Balloon as a Factor of BMI.
NCT03033264
Outpatient Versus Inpatient Balloon Catheter Induction of Labor
NCT02793609
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Double balloon catheter
Induction of labour with double balloon catheter
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age: ≧ 18 years
* Ability to read and understand informed consent
* Unique or multiple pregnancies (monochorionic or dichorionic twins)
* ≧37 weeks of pregnancy
* Unfavourable cervix (Bishop test: \< 7)
* Low-risk pregnancies
* ≤ 2 previous deliveries
* Patient acceptation and good comprehension of the instructions
* Maximum 30 minutes of distance to the hospital.
* Possibility of telephone communication at any moment
* To be accompanied by someone during the entire process at home
Exclusion Criteria
* \< 37 or ≧42 weeks of pregnancy
* Prelabour rupture of membranes
* Vaginal delivery contraindication
* Placenta previa (occlusive and not occlusive)
* Vasa previa
* Transverse or oblique lie
* Umbilical cord procubitus or prolapse
* Corporal uterine surgery with entrance into the uterine cavity
* Antecedent of ≧ 2 caesarean section
* Antecedent of inverted T caesarean section
* Antecedent of uterine rupture
* Active genital herpes infection
* Cervical carcinoma
* Severe maternal pathology
* Breech lie
* ≥ 7 Bishop score
* Non-reassuring fetal cardiotocographic registration
* Indication of immediate delivery
* Stillbirth of malformed foetus
Also, patients to be included in the out-patient group should comply with the following criteria:
\- Positive screening for vaginal / rectum group B streptococcal infection
18 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Elisa Llurba, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
WHO recommendations: Induction of labour at or beyond term. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535795/
Chen W, Xue J, Peprah MK, Wen SW, Walker M, Gao Y, Tang Y. A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour. BJOG. 2016 Feb;123(3):346-54. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13456. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
Ten Eikelder ML, Mast K, van der Velden A, Bloemenkamp KW, Mol BW. Induction of Labor Using a Foley Catheter or Misoprostol: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2016 Oct;71(10):620-630. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000361.
Diederen M, Gommers J, Wilkinson C, Turnbull D, Mol B. Safety of the balloon catheter for cervical ripening in outpatient care: complications during the period from insertion to expulsion of a balloon catheter in the process of labour induction: a systematic review. BJOG. 2018 Aug;125(9):1086-1095. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15047. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
Vaknin Z, Kurzweil Y, Sherman D. Foley catheter balloon vs locally applied prostaglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Nov;203(5):418-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.038.
McMaster K, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM. Evaluation of a Transcervical Foley Catheter as a Source of Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;126(3):539-551. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001002.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IIBSP-CRB-2019-70
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.