Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
3049 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-11-30
2016-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Finally the women satisfaction will be assessed according to the induction method used.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Alternative to Intensive Management of the Active Phase of the Second Stage of Labor
NCT03018860
Comparison of Patient Satisfaction With Home Induction and In-patient Induction.
NCT06272591
Outpatient Induction of Labour Using a Double Balloon Transcervical Catheter in Low-risk Pregnant Women: a Two-centre Open Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial - OutCRIB
NCT07265518
Patient Satisfaction During Artificial Induction of Labor by Cervical Ripening
NCT05096104
Personalized Support Care in Alternative Midwifery Birth Units Versus Traditional Units in France : Effects on Perinatal Health and Outcomes
NCT05483101
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Several methods (dinoprostone, oxytocin, misoprostol, balloon catheter …) are used to induce labor in France. To decide and perform labor inductions, physicians can refer to published guidelines according to specific obstetrical situations. But many of these guidelines are based on a low level of evidence probably explaining observed differences in practices.
In some cases, labor induction is decided without indication, and women's involvement in this kind of decisions is not really evaluated.
The objectives are therefore :
* To evaluate the frequency of use of different methods for labor induction according to the cervix status, the indication of labor induction, and the place of the delivery.
* To analyse maternal, fetal and neonatal issues according to the different induction methods, taken into account the induction indications
* To compare current practices of labor induction to published national guidelines and to assess the impact of deviations from these guidelines on maternal and neonatal issues
* To assess women's satisfaction regarding the indication and the induction method used.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
all women with an induced labor
prospective population-based cohort of all women who have an induced labor during one month in seven perinatal networks
all women with an induced labor
all women who have an induced labor
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
all women with an induced labor
all women who have an induced labor
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* with a live fetus at the beginning of induction
* patient who did not have any opposition to use her medical and personal data or her child's medical data for research
Exclusion Criteria
* termination of pregnancy
* patient's refusal to participate to the study
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Agence Nationale de sécurité du Médicament
OTHER
URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin
OTHER
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Camille Le Ray
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assistance publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP)
François Goffinet
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Assistance publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Port-Royal maternity unit, Cochin Hospital, Assistance publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP
Paris, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Jochum F, Le Ray C, Blanc-Petitjean P, Langer B, Meyer N, Severac F, Sananes N. Externally Validated Score to Predict Cesarean Delivery After Labor Induction With Cervi Ripening. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Sep;134(3):502-510. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003405.
Blanc-Petitjean P, Schmitz T, Salome M, Goffinet F, Le Ray C; MEDIP Study Group. Target populations to reduce cesarean rates after induced labor: A national population-based cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Mar;99(3):406-412. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13751. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
Blanc-Petitjean P, Salome M, Dupont C, Crenn-Hebert C, Gaudineau A, Perrotte F, Raynal P, Clouqueur E, Beucher G, Carbonne B, Goffinet F, Le Ray C. Labour induction practices in France: A population-based declarative survey in 94 maternity units. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2018 Feb;47(2):57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AAP-2014-030
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.