Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
3000 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-07-01
2021-07-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This new tool will account for many variables in patient demography(age, race, weight ... etc ) and medical history (previous OBGYN surgery, comorbidities .... etc). These variables not usually found in the classic bishop score. We predict that our analysis will aid doctors in making better decisions and efficiently predict the outcomes, need for switching to operative delivery and possible complications.
Machine learning and digital calculation of hazards will allow more precise assessment and more efficient management during IOL as it considers variables not included in clinical scores.
this study aims to provide modern and efficient assessment parameters to guide clinical decision making during the IOL process and help doctors predict its outcomes based on subtle factors not usually considered.
This will minimize the complications and allow more evidence-based practice.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cervical Sliding Sign to Predict Outcome of Induction of Labor
NCT06324279
Methods of Labor Induction and Perinatal Outcomes
NCT02477085
Evaluation of Management and Outcomes of Normal Labor in Eldakhla Hospital
NCT06922435
Early Versus Late Amniotomy During Labor Induction in Women With Bishop's Score of ≥ 6
NCT04731896
The Success of Labor Induction Based on a Modified BISHOP Score.
NCT04220320
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
we will collect data from at least 12 centers worldwide describing the course, outcomes, maternal or fetal complications, and any related data. The data will be collected after ethical approval and from consenting patients in a prospective manner. during the period from July 1st, 2020 to June 30th, 2021 (anticipated dates).
each center will be responsible for quality assessment, data collection, and ensuring the data is accurate, complete, and representative.
Data collection includes baseline pelvic examination (cervical position, consistency, dilation, effacement, fetal position, and bishop score), method of induction and their time of administration in relation to index time (start of IOL), findings and time of serial pelvic examinations, fetal heart tone, and maternal vital signs. The entry of data from serial examinations will continue during active labor and fetal and maternal outcomes will be reported. If the diagnosis of failed IOL is made and obstetric team decides delivery by Cesarean section, criteria of diagnosis/indication of Cesarean delivery will be reported. Length of active labor and the second stage will be documented, and maternal/perinatal complications will be reported. the collectors must ensure patient confidentiality and safety.
Inclusion criteria:-
* Pregnant women admitted for IOL, aged between 18 to 40 years
* Term or late preterm pregnancy (gestational age at 34 weeks or beyond)
* A reassuring fetal heart tracing prior to IOL
Exclusion criteria:-
* Fetal growth restriction with abnormal Doppler indices
* Intrauterine fetal death
* Suspected intra-amniotic infection prior to IOL
* Fetal major congenital anomalies
* Patients who decline IOL in prior or during IOL without medical indication
statistical analysis :- Data will be described using (mean, median, standard deviation, range) in the final sample. Machine learning method is superior to traditional statistical methods as it provides robust and automatic estimation of complex relationships between different variables and clinical outcomes. Data will be utilized as xi and yi where xi presents input (features) and yi presents dependent variables (outcomes). Functional regression is based on support vector machine by regressing the outcomes yi on inputs xi. Model Validation will be performed via bootstrap estimation to evaluate the predictive ability of the functional regression models. Data will be split to training data (approximately 63% of the data) to create prediction model where bootstrapping will be applied, and testing data where prediction model will be validated. Machine learning models will be created using python 3.8.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
induction of labor monitoring
meticulous data collection from patients and plotting that data in a machine learning model
induction of labor
Giving drugs to facilitate uterine contractions and fasten the process of delivery
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
induction of labor
Giving drugs to facilitate uterine contractions and fasten the process of delivery
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Term or late preterm pregnancy (gestational age at 34 weeks or beyond)
* Reassuring fetal heart tracing prior to IOL
Exclusion Criteria
* Intrauterine fetal death
* Suspected intra-amniotic infection prior to IOL
* Fetal major congenital anomalies
* Patients who decline IOL in priori or during IOL without medical indication
18 Years
40 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aswan University
OTHER
Middle-East OBGYN Graduate Education Foundation
OTHER
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sherif Abdelkarim Mohammed Shazly
Assistant lecturer -Assiut University Hospitals - Women Health Hospital
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sherif Shazly, M.S
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assiut University
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, Osterman MJ, Mathews TJ. Births: final data for 2011. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2013 Jun 28;62(1):1-69, 72.
Grobman WA, Bailit J, Lai Y, Reddy UM, Wapner RJ, Varner MW, Thorp JM Jr, Leveno KJ, Caritis SN, Prasad M, Tita ATN, Saade G, Sorokin Y, Rouse DJ, Blackwell SC, Tolosa JE; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Defining failed induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;218(1):122.e1-122.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.556. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
Teixeira C, Lunet N, Rodrigues T, Barros H. The Bishop Score as a determinant of labour induction success: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Sep;286(3):739-53. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2341-3. Epub 2012 May 1.
Khandelwal R, Patel P, Pitre D, Sheth T, Maitra N. Comparison of Cervical Length Measured by Transvaginal Ultrasonography and Bishop Score in Predicting Response to Labor Induction. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2018 Feb;68(1):51-57. doi: 10.1007/s13224-017-1027-y. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
official website for the NGO foundation that the principle investigator created and sponsor the research
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IOL-ID
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.