Induction Of Labor: Predictors of Outcomes

NCT ID: NCT04350437

Last Updated: 2020-04-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

3000 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-07-01

Study Completion Date

2021-07-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Induction of labor is a widely used intervention in OBGYN practice. Doctors still use the old Bishop score in patients' follow up. It remains difficult to anticipate the outcomes and the possibility of adverse effects during this process. In this large prospective multicentric interventional study, we aim to develop a more precise and sensitive score based on machine learning tools programmed on python 3.8

This new tool will account for many variables in patient demography(age, race, weight ... etc ) and medical history (previous OBGYN surgery, comorbidities .... etc). These variables not usually found in the classic bishop score. We predict that our analysis will aid doctors in making better decisions and efficiently predict the outcomes, need for switching to operative delivery and possible complications.

Machine learning and digital calculation of hazards will allow more precise assessment and more efficient management during IOL as it considers variables not included in clinical scores.

this study aims to provide modern and efficient assessment parameters to guide clinical decision making during the IOL process and help doctors predict its outcomes based on subtle factors not usually considered.

This will minimize the complications and allow more evidence-based practice.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

the objective is to create a database registry documenting the induction of labor (IOL) process and apply machine learning tools to create a more precise assessment score for doctors as a contemporary follow-up method.

we will collect data from at least 12 centers worldwide describing the course, outcomes, maternal or fetal complications, and any related data. The data will be collected after ethical approval and from consenting patients in a prospective manner. during the period from July 1st, 2020 to June 30th, 2021 (anticipated dates).

each center will be responsible for quality assessment, data collection, and ensuring the data is accurate, complete, and representative.

Data collection includes baseline pelvic examination (cervical position, consistency, dilation, effacement, fetal position, and bishop score), method of induction and their time of administration in relation to index time (start of IOL), findings and time of serial pelvic examinations, fetal heart tone, and maternal vital signs. The entry of data from serial examinations will continue during active labor and fetal and maternal outcomes will be reported. If the diagnosis of failed IOL is made and obstetric team decides delivery by Cesarean section, criteria of diagnosis/indication of Cesarean delivery will be reported. Length of active labor and the second stage will be documented, and maternal/perinatal complications will be reported. the collectors must ensure patient confidentiality and safety.

Inclusion criteria:-

* Pregnant women admitted for IOL, aged between 18 to 40 years
* Term or late preterm pregnancy (gestational age at 34 weeks or beyond)
* A reassuring fetal heart tracing prior to IOL

Exclusion criteria:-

* Fetal growth restriction with abnormal Doppler indices
* Intrauterine fetal death
* Suspected intra-amniotic infection prior to IOL
* Fetal major congenital anomalies
* Patients who decline IOL in prior or during IOL without medical indication

statistical analysis :- Data will be described using (mean, median, standard deviation, range) in the final sample. Machine learning method is superior to traditional statistical methods as it provides robust and automatic estimation of complex relationships between different variables and clinical outcomes. Data will be utilized as xi and yi where xi presents input (features) and yi presents dependent variables (outcomes). Functional regression is based on support vector machine by regressing the outcomes yi on inputs xi. Model Validation will be performed via bootstrap estimation to evaluate the predictive ability of the functional regression models. Data will be split to training data (approximately 63% of the data) to create prediction model where bootstrapping will be applied, and testing data where prediction model will be validated. Machine learning models will be created using python 3.8.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Induction of Labor Affected Fetus / Newborn

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Detailed data from patients undergoing induction of labor. Analysis of the data will predict the outcomes in regards to possible complications.
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

induction of labor monitoring

meticulous data collection from patients and plotting that data in a machine learning model

Group Type OTHER

induction of labor

Intervention Type DRUG

Giving drugs to facilitate uterine contractions and fasten the process of delivery

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

induction of labor

Giving drugs to facilitate uterine contractions and fasten the process of delivery

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

non operative vaginal delivery

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Pregnant women admitted for IOL, aged between 18 to 40 years
* Term or late preterm pregnancy (gestational age at 34 weeks or beyond)
* Reassuring fetal heart tracing prior to IOL

Exclusion Criteria

* Fetal growth restriction with abnormal Doppler indices
* Intrauterine fetal death
* Suspected intra-amniotic infection prior to IOL
* Fetal major congenital anomalies
* Patients who decline IOL in priori or during IOL without medical indication
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Aswan University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Middle-East OBGYN Graduate Education Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sherif Abdelkarim Mohammed Shazly

Assistant lecturer -Assiut University Hospitals - Women Health Hospital

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sherif Shazly, M.S

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assiut University

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Sherif A shazly, M.S

Role: CONTACT

+15075131392

islam A Ahmed, M.B.B.Ch

Role: CONTACT

01062207716 ext. yes

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, Osterman MJ, Mathews TJ. Births: final data for 2011. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2013 Jun 28;62(1):1-69, 72.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24974591 (View on PubMed)

Grobman WA, Bailit J, Lai Y, Reddy UM, Wapner RJ, Varner MW, Thorp JM Jr, Leveno KJ, Caritis SN, Prasad M, Tita ATN, Saade G, Sorokin Y, Rouse DJ, Blackwell SC, Tolosa JE; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Defining failed induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;218(1):122.e1-122.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.556. Epub 2017 Nov 11.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29138035 (View on PubMed)

Teixeira C, Lunet N, Rodrigues T, Barros H. The Bishop Score as a determinant of labour induction success: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Sep;286(3):739-53. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2341-3. Epub 2012 May 1.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22546948 (View on PubMed)

Khandelwal R, Patel P, Pitre D, Sheth T, Maitra N. Comparison of Cervical Length Measured by Transvaginal Ultrasonography and Bishop Score in Predicting Response to Labor Induction. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2018 Feb;68(1):51-57. doi: 10.1007/s13224-017-1027-y. Epub 2017 Jun 23.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29391676 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.mogge-obgyn.com/

official website for the NGO foundation that the principle investigator created and sponsor the research

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IOL-ID

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pocket Warming of Epidural Medication
NCT02912078 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA