Effects of Systematic Cervical Exam Training on Labor and Delivery Care
NCT ID: NCT04421768
Last Updated: 2025-12-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
1125 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-07-23
2026-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
systematic cervical exam training--retrospective measures
Effects of systematic cervical exam training on Labor and Delivery Care The total number of exams per hour of labor or triage stay and exam discrepancy between 2 examiners who performed exams less than 30 minutes apart will be compared between the 6 month time period before the unit wide training and 6 months after completing training
cervical exam training
Each nurse will then examine 1 sets of 10 high-fidelity silicone task trainers approximately three per week for a maximum of 20 sessions (200 repetitions total). For each set of 10 exams, the estimates will recorded on an answer sheet. A cumulative summation analysis will be performed on each participant. When an individual nurse achieves competence her training will be suspended
systematic cervical exam training--prospective measures
Effects of systematic cervical exam training on Labor and Delivery care Patient will be approached to obtain consent for them to have 2 cervical exams performed one after the other when an exam is clinically indicated. The discrepancy between the 2 examiners will be compared between the 6 month time period before the unit wide training and 6 months after completion of the training.
cervical exam training
Each nurse will then examine 1 sets of 10 high-fidelity silicone task trainers approximately three per week for a maximum of 20 sessions (200 repetitions total). For each set of 10 exams, the estimates will recorded on an answer sheet. A cumulative summation analysis will be performed on each participant. When an individual nurse achieves competence her training will be suspended
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
cervical exam training
Each nurse will then examine 1 sets of 10 high-fidelity silicone task trainers approximately three per week for a maximum of 20 sessions (200 repetitions total). For each set of 10 exams, the estimates will recorded on an answer sheet. A cumulative summation analysis will be performed on each participant. When an individual nurse achieves competence her training will be suspended
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
• physicians, midwives, and labor and delivery nurses working on the Labor and Delivery unit within the Wake Forest Baptist Birth Center
Patients:
• any pregnant women receiving care on the Labor and Delivery unit of Wake Forest Baptist Birth Center
Exclusion Criteria
• none
Patients:
* placenta previa
* vasa previa
* any other contraindication to cervical exam
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Joshua F Nitsche, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Joshua F Nitsche, MD
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB00064273
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id