A Prospective Comparative Study of Induction of Labor With a Cervical Ripening Double Balloon vs Foley Catheter
NCT ID: NCT00501033
Last Updated: 2008-05-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
200 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-01-31
2008-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Foley Balloon With or Without Traction for the Cervical Ripening
NCT01063244
Comparing Methods for Balloon Catheter Inserting: View Guided (Speculum) Versus Manual Guided at Cervical Examination
NCT05253690
Induction of Labor After Cesarean Using Foley Alone vs. Concurrent Foley and Oxytocin
NCT07006896
Comparing Foley Catheter Balloon With Early Amniotomy for Induction of Labor at Term
NCT03629548
Combined Nipple Stimulation and Foley Balloon for Cervical Ripening
NCT07317674
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Mechanical induction of labor
Double Balloon
Foley Catheter
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Parturients candidates for mechanical induction of labor
Exclusion Criteria
* Vaginal discharge
* Pre induction pyrexia
* Immunocompromised parturients
18 Years
50 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Western Galilee Hospital-Nahariya
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Western Galilee Hospital
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ido Solt, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Western Galilee Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Western Galilee Hospital
Nahariya, , Israel
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Solt I, Frank Wolf M, Ben-Haroush S, Kaminskyi S, Ophir E, Bornstein J. Foley catheter versus cervical double balloon for labor induction: a prospective randomized study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Apr;34(7):1034-1041. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1623776. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
4
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.