A Randomized Study on Comparing the Efficacy of Foley Catheter and Extraamniotic Saline Infusion for Labor Induction

NCT ID: NCT00366951

Last Updated: 2008-01-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-04-30

Study Completion Date

2005-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Our purpose was to compare the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter with oxytocin and extraamniotic saline infusion with oxytocin for induction of labor requiring cervical ripening.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Induction of labor is indicated when the benefit to either the mother or fetus outweighs that of continuing the pregnancy. Labor induction in the presence of an unripened cervix is associated with prolonged labor, chorioamnionitis, and cesarean delivery. Numerous mechanical and pharmacological methods have been used for cervical ripening. There are limited numbers of rigorous studies comparing the efficacy of the various methods. One of the most common mechanical methods for cervical ripening is placement of a Foley catheter with a 30 cc balloon inside the cervix, with or without the use of oxytocin. The Foley balloon will disrupt the amniotic membrane surface and cause the release of prostaglandin, a natural chemical from the cervix, to facilitate the ripening process. Oxytocin will be used concurrently as the induction agent. Recently, a modification of this method, extraamniotic saline infusion (EASI) has become more popular. The EASI method involves similar procedure including the placement of Foley catheter inside the cervix; in addition, saline solution will be infused through the catheter. This additional step is thought to further facilitate the disruption of amniotic membrane surface. Both methods are safe and become the standard treatment for cervical ripening. However, there are no published trials so far comparing the two methods. The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter with oxytocin and EASI with oxytocin for induction of labor requiring cervical ripening. The study is designed to be a single masked randomized trial.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cervical Ripening Labor, Induced

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Foley catheter only

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Extraamniotic saline infusion

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* singleton gestation
* cephalic vertex presentation
* intact membrane
* gestational age between 30 and 42 weeks
* Bishop score less than or equal to 5

Exclusion Criteria

* suspected chorioamnionitis
* placenta previa
* low lying placenta
* unexplained vaginal bleeding
* intrauterine fetal demise
* HIV
* any contraindication to vaginal delivery
Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rush University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Yukmei R Lam, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Rush University Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rush University Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

de Vaan MD, Ten Eikelder ML, Jozwiak M, Palmer KR, Davies-Tuck M, Bloemenkamp KW, Mol BWJ, Boulvain M. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 30;3(3):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36996264 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ORA#: 03111102

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.