Outpatient Foley For Starting Induction of Labor at TErm
NCT ID: NCT02756689
Last Updated: 2019-07-09
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
129 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-03-31
2017-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Outpatient Foley For Starting Induction of Labor at Term in Nulliparous Women
NCT03472937
Foley Catheter for Labor Induction in Women With Term and Near Term Membrane Rupture
NCT00290199
Outpatient Labor Induction With the Transcervical Foley Balloon
NCT02210598
Outpatient Foley Cervix Priming
NCT02842879
Cervical Ripening as an Outpatient Method Using the Foley (COMFORT)
NCT05759988
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Outpatient cervical ripening is an attractive alternative to women and physicians because of the decreased amount of time spent in the hospital and opportunity for patients to be in the comforts of their home.
The investigators will conduct a randomized controlled trial comparing outpatient to inpatient cervical ripening using a transcervical Foley catheter. Women will be randomized to undergo inpatient or outpatient transcervical Foley catheter cervical ripening beyond their 39th week of gestation. Women and their infants will be followed until the time of their discharge.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Inpatient cervical Ripening
Subjects in this arm will be seen in the outpatient setting, and if they qualify and are randomized to the inpatient (control) group, they will be admitted to labor and delivery the next day for cervical ripening with a transcervical Foley catheter.
Inpatient cervical ripening
Subjects will undergo cervical ripening in the inpatient setting.
Outpatient cervical Ripening
Subjects in this arm will undergo cervical ripening with a transcervical Foley catheter in the outpatient setting (treatment arm). The transcervical catheter will be placed in the office after confirmation of fetal well-being. They will then return the next morning to be admitted to labor and delivery for oxytocin administration.
Outpatient cervical ripening
Subjects will undergo cervical ripening in the outpatient setting. The patients will then be scheduled to return the next morning for induction of labor.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Inpatient cervical ripening
Subjects will undergo cervical ripening in the inpatient setting.
Outpatient cervical ripening
Subjects will undergo cervical ripening in the outpatient setting. The patients will then be scheduled to return the next morning for induction of labor.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Multiparous
* Singleton gestation
* Gestational age between 39+0 and 42+0
* Vertex presentation
* Cervix ≤ 3 cm. If cervix is between 2 and 3 cm dilated, it must be \<80% effaced
* No prior cesarean section or uterine surgery
* Resides within Jefferson County, Alabama.
* Access to a telephone
* Reliable transportation
Exclusion Criteria
* Latex allergy
* Contraindication to induction of labor
* Evidence of labor
* Fetal anomaly or demise
* Inability to given consent (non-English speaking, inability to read or write)
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Spencer G. Kuper
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Spencer G Kuper, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UAB, Department of Maternal-Fetal Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
WHO Recommendations for Induction of Labour. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK131963/
Kelly AJ, Alfirevic Z, Ghosh A. Outpatient versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 12;(11):CD007372. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007372.pub3.
Wing DA. Labor induction with misoprostol. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Aug;181(2):339-45. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70558-2.
Alfirevic Z, Kelly AJ, Dowswell T. Intravenous oxytocin alone for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7;2009(4):CD003246. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003246.pub2.
Jozwiak M, Bloemenkamp KW, Kelly AJ, Mol BW, Irion O, Boulvain M. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;(3):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub2.
Farmer KC, Schwartz WJ 3rd, Rayburn WF, Turnbull G. A cost-minimization analysis of intracervical prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening in an outpatient versus inpatient setting. Clin Ther. 1996 Jul-Aug;18(4):747-56; discussion 702. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(96)80224-4.
Dowswell T, Kelly AJ, Livio S, Norman JE, Alfirevic Z. Different methods for the induction of labour in outpatient settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Aug 4;(8):CD007701. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007701.pub2.
O'Brien JM, Mercer BM, Cleary NT, Sibai BM. Efficacy of outpatient induction with low-dose intravaginal prostaglandin E2: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Dec;173(6):1855-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90440-9.
McKenna DS, Costa SW, Samuels P. Prostaglandin E2 cervical ripening without subsequent induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Jul;94(1):11-4. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00244-6.
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Aug;114(2 Pt 1):386-397. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5. No abstract available.
Edwards RK, Szychowski JM, Berger JL, Petersen M, Ingersoll M, Bodea-Braescu AV, Lin MG. Foley catheter compared with the controlled-release dinoprostone insert: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;123(6):1280-1287. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000238.
Pettker CM, Pocock SB, Smok DP, Lee SM, Devine PC. Transcervical Foley catheter with and without oxytocin for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jun;111(6):1320-6. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31817615a0.
Sciscione AC, Bedder CL, Hoffman MK, Ruhstaller K, Shlossman PA. The timing of adverse events with Foley catheter preinduction cervical ripening; implications for outpatient use. Am J Perinatol. 2014 Oct;31(9):781-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1359718. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
Henry A, Madan A, Reid R, Tracy SK, Austin K, Welsh A, Challis D. Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Jan 29;13:25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-25.
McMaster K, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM. Evaluation of a Transcervical Foley Catheter as a Source of Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;126(3):539-551. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001002.
Sciscione AC, Muench M, Pollock M, Jenkins TM, Tildon-Burton J, Colmorgen GH. Transcervical Foley catheter for preinduction cervical ripening in an outpatient versus inpatient setting. Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Nov;98(5 Pt 1):751-6. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01579-4.
Alfirevic Z, Gyte GM, Nogueira Pileggi V, Plachcinski R, Osoti AO, Finucane EM. Home versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 27;8(8):CD007372. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007372.pub4.
Kuper SG, Jauk VC, George DM, Edwards RK, Szychowski JM, Mazzoni SE, Wang MJ, Files P, Tita AT, Subramaniam A, Harper LM. Outpatient Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor in Parous Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;132(1):94-101. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002678.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
F151022005
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.