Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
105 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-04-01
2017-04-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Success of Labor Induction Based on a Modified BISHOP Score.
NCT04220320
Comparison Between Ultrasonographic Cervical Length and Bishop Score in Preinduction Cervical Assessment
NCT01317706
Bishop Score and Transvaginal Ultrasound for Preinduction Cervical Assessment in Multiparas
NCT01317823
Early Versus Late Amniotomy During Labor Induction in Women With Bishop's Score of ≥ 6
NCT04731896
Cervical Sliding Sign to Predict Outcome of Induction of Labor
NCT06324279
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Cervical dilatation in centimeters will be given a score of zero if dilatation less than 1cm, a score of 1 if 1-2 cm dilated, a score of 2 if more than 2 cm dilataion.
2. Length of the cervix will be given a score of zero if more than 2 cm, a score of 1 if 1-2 cm, a score of 2 if less than 1 cm.
3. Station of fetal head will be given a score of zero if -2 or higher , a score of 1 if -1, a score of 2 if zero or lower.
4. Consistency of the cervix will be given a score of zero if firm, a score of 1 if soft and a score of 2 if soft and stretchable.
5. Position of the cervix will be given a score of zero if posterior, a score of 1 if mid position and a score of 2 if anterior. So, a total score (sum of all scores) of zero at a minimum to 10 at a maximum can be estimated.
and also preinduction cervical assessment using transvaginal ultrasound and Manipal system where:
1. Length of the cervix will be given a score of zero if more than 3 cm, a score of 1 if 2-3 cm, a score of 2 if less than 2 cm.
2. Length of the funnel will be given a score of zero if absent, a score of 1 if ≤ 0.5 cm, a score of 2 if more than 0.5 cm.
3. width of the funnel will be given a score of zero if absent, a score of 1 if ≤ 0.5 cm, a score of 2 if more than 0.5 cm.
4. cervical position and shape will be given a score of zero if curved, a score of 2 if straight
5. Distance of presenting part to external os will be given a score of zero if more than 3 cm, a score of 1 if 2-3 cm, a score of 2 if less than 2 cm
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Manipal cervical scoring system
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Cephalic presentation.
3. Longitudinal lie.
4. Living fetus.
5. Intact membrane
Exclusion Criteria
2. Antepartum hemorrhage including (abruptio placenta, placenta previa or vasa previa).
3. Abnormal fetal lie or presentation.
4. Pervious uterine surgery as myomectomy.
5. Category II, III non stress test.
6. Pelvic structural deformity.
7. Intrautrine growth retardation or macrosomia (estimated fetal weight ˃ than 4kg).
8. Patients who received any pre induction ripening.
9. Active genital herpes.
10. Invasive cervical carcinoma
20 Years
40 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ain Shams University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Radwa Rasheedy Ali
lecturer of obstetrics and gynecology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gasser M El-Bishry, MD,FRCOG
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Professor
Ihab F Allam, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Professor
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ASU maternity hospital
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.